Started By
Message

re: Psaki can’t guarantee military intervention for remaining Americans past August 31st

Posted on 8/17/21 at 3:00 pm to
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
56583 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 3:00 pm to
I have a dumb question here. Were any of these people planning on staying after the military left, anyway? I ask because I am somewhat skeptical of the State dept/intel community turning on Biden because the NGO and private contractor gravy train is being turned off. In other words, I don't feel quite so bad for those people who were planning on staying to cash in for the foreseeable future and circumstances have now gone south on them. But, if it's mostly volunteers or something, that's a different story.
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2008
10757 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

The military has no plans because the military was ordered by the President to GTFO.


Dang, if only he had the power to reverse that order.
Posted by GeauxFightingTigers1
Member since Oct 2016
12574 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Yes


That probably isn't going to happen, the military isn't even suppose to be there.
Posted by touchdownjeebus
Member since Sep 2010
24971 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Am I supposed to be angry about this?


If you aren’t at least mildly pissed off about all of this already, well…
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
29951 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Good grief. The FIRST thing a person in power should NOT do is take options OFF the table. This is more telegraphing weakness. The US has explicity, and publicly, told the Taliban they can wait it out and have 10,000 hostages if they want them.

We're doing everything but sending Biden over there to take a knee. Maybe he'll go when he's done with his vacation?


I agree on the messaging 100%. That's why the deadline to leave was always stupid to put into words/on paper.

As far as my question on what to do, I am referring to the situation on the ground. Actual, practical actions, not just continuing to get mad about how fricked up the entire operation is.

Without re-inserting our forces nationwide, what else are we supposed to do other than tell people they have to find their own way to the airport? (Again--I know its fricked. That has been established ad nauseum and no one disagrees)
This post was edited on 8/17/21 at 3:03 pm
Posted by GeauxFightingTigers1
Member since Oct 2016
12574 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

Dang, if only he had the power to reverse that order.


The order is only a requirement under the agreement.

The military isn't suppose to be there really.
This post was edited on 8/17/21 at 3:03 pm
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
21116 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

So are yall wanting the military to go door to door countrywide and track people down and bring them to Kabul or the airport? That ship sailed days to weeks ago.


No shite, that's the issue with the entire withdrawal. Biden had no plan for any of this which is what has led to this debacle.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
58328 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

As far as my question on what to do,
We're going to whatever the Taliban tell us to do.
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2008
10757 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

That is absolutely what we should have done months ago. Sadly, it isn't in the cards anymore.


Sure it is. Why do you think it's not?
Posted by LongueCarabine
Pointe Aux Pins, LA
Member since Jan 2011
8205 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

Its also they same people that are saying there are still 10,000 US citizens in Afghanistan. Do you believe their numbers or not?


I’ve read other sources that it may be as many as 15,000 to 20,000.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
29951 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Why do you think it's not?



Because the lack of will to do just that anymore is exactly why we are in this position to begin with.

I don't think that reinserting tens of thousands of troops to reoccupy Kabul and other urban areas is in the cards anymore. You do?
Posted by Lightning
Texas
Member since May 2014
2482 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

Just trying to understand what you all are expecting to be done at this point. Given all the failures to happen thus far, I don't understand the additional outrage over stating that we can't guarantee military assistance after our deadline to pull out our forces.


Sounds remarkably similar to "What difference, at this point, does it make?"
Posted by BurntOrangeMan
Dallas TX
Member since May 2021
5628 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

The Pentagon has already said they expect to be capable of 5,000-9,000 evacuations per day now that the airport is under control.


I will not send in more troops, swift is safety

Biden has a plan to beat Covid
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
24386 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

That’s unbelievable, just unbelievable. The American government abandoning 10,000 of its own citizens.


Huh? They were told in June to leave. And the ones still there have 2 weeks to get out while we are still there keeping the airport operational.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
80836 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 3:12 pm to
Even though I, like most of you, detest WAPO, this is a pretty good article which lays out the lack of attention to the issue

LINK

The State Department and the Defense Department basically have two options: negotiate safe passage for American citizens with the Taliban, if possible, or send the U.S. military out into the city to bring Americans back to the airport before the Taliban gangs find them. Officials working on these cases inside the government told me they have no clear guidance from the White House and not enough support.“We need more troops from the Pentagon, and we need more State Department resources to evacuate Americans,” the official said. “I feel like I’m working against my own government to get my own country’s people out.”

Biden needs to go.

Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
29951 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

Sounds remarkably similar to "What difference, at this point, does it make?"


The critical difference being that I am not the Secretary of State charged with protecting the lives of our Foreign Services and allies.

And my question remains genuine. Do you think, with the facts as they stand now, that going door to door and picking people up is an option? Because I don't see it. I would love for the answer to be different. All of these people should have been evacuated weeks ago, and we should have never abandoned Bagram before our people were completely out of country. But that isn't where we are.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
144219 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

The Pentagon has already said they expect to be capable of 5,000-9,000 evacuations per day now that the airport is under control.


That not exactly what they said
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
29951 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

The State Department and the Defense Department basically have two options: negotiate safe passage for American citizens with the Taliban, if possible, or send the U.S. military out into the city to bring Americans back to the airport before the Taliban gangs find them. Officials working on these cases inside the government told me they have no clear guidance from the White House and not enough support.“We need more troops from the Pentagon, and we need more State Department resources to evacuate Americans,” the official said. “I feel like I’m working against my own government to get my own country’s people out.”


Just imagine how frustrating it must be for our commanders on the ground having to watch this unfold. Disgraceful.
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2008
10757 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

Indefatigable

GeauxFightingTigers1

The military isn't suppose to be there really.


So wait, are you 2 telling me that the US, the strongest military in the nation, the most powerful nation in the world, has to abide by some "not supposed to be there" rule to bow down to this piss ant country and leave our fellow Americans over there to die? This is what you are telling me? "That ship has sailed", you say? GTFO. Send troops back, kill whoever gets in the way, get our civilians out, get whatever allies you want to get out. Basically, do it like it should have been done in the first place. And if the Taliban call it an act of war, OK. Then handle that situation. It ain't that hard.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
29951 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

re you 2 telling me that the US, the strongest military in the nation, the most powerful nation in the world, has to abide by some "not supposed to be there" rule to bow down to this piss ant country and leave our fellow Americans over there to die? This is what you are telling me?


No, I don't care about the agreement at all.

Our lack of ability to just send squads out in Kabul at this time is prevented by the facts on the ground. We are vastly outnumbered as it stands, and we have no leverage whatsoever in forcing the Taliban to let us operate.

quote:

Send troops back, kill whoever gets in the way, get our civilians out, get whatever allies you want to get out. Basically, do it like it should have been done in the first place. And if the Taliban call it an act of war, OK. Then handle that situation. It ain't that hard.



That's fine, and I don't disagree that this is what everyone would like to see. But I don't know how you guys think that is going to be an option here.

We don't have the pieces in place to do that.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram