- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/12/22 at 5:46 pm to BR92
quote:
Department of Energy ? How could the Atomic energy act of 1948 give sole classification authority to a department (DOE) that was established in 1977 ?
That’s what I’m wondering. Unless they amended the AEA.
Posted on 8/12/22 at 5:48 pm to AUstar
This is reason #3 for the raid, the first two weren’t good enough now we’re onto nukes 
Posted on 8/12/22 at 5:49 pm to Frac the world
Ghost nukes. Muh Orange Man still has codes.
Posted on 8/12/22 at 5:51 pm to AUstar
The Federal government has been lying for fifty years, but they're telling the truth this time.
Posted on 8/12/22 at 5:52 pm to AUstar
Sounds like they're admitting Trump declassified everything. Meaning they have nothing.
Posted on 8/12/22 at 5:52 pm to 850SaintsGator
quote:
Ummm we just speeding past the “ wtf does he have nuke secrets” part??? Umm why does he have them..classified or not???
Doubt he does.
Posted on 8/12/22 at 5:54 pm to BBONDS25
This isn’t about guilt but giving their base hope and red meat -
Posted on 8/12/22 at 6:24 pm to AUstar
My question is they took 15 boxes of evidence was each one documented upon taking it from MAL who is to say the upstanding officials from the FBI wouldn't add a page or 2 of super-duper secret nuclear documents
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:07 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
Did you fall for the Trump/Russia collusion hoax? Do you still believe Trump is a Russian asset? If you answered yes to both questions I can see why you believe Trump really has top secret/SAP nuclear documents in his possession. Do you TDS lunatics ever tire of being wrong? Lol
I was referencing the OP and the written clip they posted ….
The clip talked about nuke secrets and the OP just blipped over that part-
But nice melty melt by being triggered over a perceived TDS post
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:20 pm to AUstar
And former Presidents take the highest security level with them to the grave, so he can have all he wants.
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:22 pm to AUstar
quote:
gives sole classification authority (concerning nukes) to DOE
If only the DOE was part of the Executive Branch.
Oh, wait...
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:23 pm to AUstar
quote:
The constitution is pretty clear that the President is the final authority
The despise that “pesky document”.
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:45 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
I love how, with absolutely no confirmation whatsoever, the media has decided that the nuke rumor is true to the point where they're discussing the nuances of a nuke-related prosecution against Trump
We shouldn't be surprised at anything they do. They ran with the fake dossier. They ran with the non-existent piss tape. They ran with "Russian Collusion". Many of these people are the same assholes that were assuring us in Dubya's years that Karl Rove had been indicted that his arrest was "imminent".
The difference between Q Anon types and these types is that these types are fans of and work in the media itself.
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:56 pm to 850SaintsGator
quote:
Ummm we just speeding past the “ wtf does he have nuke secrets” part??? Umm why does he have them..classified or not???
might have some deal set up for them for sale to some 3rd world pukes or maybe his friends in Russia. With Trump who knows why but you can bet he has his rea$on$
Posted on 8/12/22 at 10:18 pm to AUstar
Here is the real talking point: none of the criminal statutes listed in the warrant require the documents to be "classified". Whether Trump declassified the documents may be irrelevant.
The warrant lists 3 criminal statutes the FBI claimed to have probable cause were violated. They may fail to prove violations of one or more of those, but they are free to add additional charges if warranted.
One statute relates to the theft or destruction of government documents. Doesn't matter what type of documents.
The second is basically an obstruction ststute criminalizing the concealment or destruction of documents with the intent to obstruct an investigation or administration of any matter. Again. The nature of the documents is irrelevant.
The espionage statute is the big one, and it broadly criminalized the unauthorized retention or disclosure of information relating to national defense. No mention of classification of the documents, as the statute was written before the classification system existed. The question will just be whether the information was secret and potentially harmful to the US.
The warrant lists 3 criminal statutes the FBI claimed to have probable cause were violated. They may fail to prove violations of one or more of those, but they are free to add additional charges if warranted.
One statute relates to the theft or destruction of government documents. Doesn't matter what type of documents.
The second is basically an obstruction ststute criminalizing the concealment or destruction of documents with the intent to obstruct an investigation or administration of any matter. Again. The nature of the documents is irrelevant.
The espionage statute is the big one, and it broadly criminalized the unauthorized retention or disclosure of information relating to national defense. No mention of classification of the documents, as the statute was written before the classification system existed. The question will just be whether the information was secret and potentially harmful to the US.
Posted on 8/12/22 at 10:24 pm to Dday63
Regret your vote for the big guy yet?
Posted on 8/12/22 at 10:40 pm to roadGator
quote:
Regret your vote for the big guy yet?
Nope. Nor will I. I never thought Biden would be a good President, but I was voting against Trump. Everything he has done since election night confirms my belief he is unfit for office.
Posted on 8/12/22 at 11:08 pm to AUstar
This raid has nothing to do with what Trump did, it’s about what he had and who it implicated!!
Posted on 8/12/22 at 11:13 pm to Dday63
quote:
Nope. Nor will I. I never thought Biden would be a good President, but I was voting against Trump. Everything he has done since election night confirms my belief he is unfit for office.
You would rather vote for inflation and a bad economy because you dislike Trump? That makes zero sense.
Page 2 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News