Started By
Message

re: President Trump suggests something was planted in the Epstein files…

Posted on 7/28/25 at 1:06 pm to
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
32961 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

Also, if they had planted his name in those files, they'd have done it to release it during the election.

They didnt thin k they would lose to Trump

They fricked with the files after the election
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
56654 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

The same DOJ and FBI that just told us Epstein killed himself? The same one that told us no cameras were working in the jail but now there is footage but some of the footage was erased?? Can’t trust a word of what they say. Just release all of the files so we can see what’s out there.


Ok, let's play your scenario out, what happens next? You released all the files, now what?

At best, it lets' those that may be exposed, start building their alibies. At worst, the dems did doctor the files, and nowTrump/Vance/your mom, anyone the dems want to destroy is now latched onto by the media. Now, you and I may be able to see through it but the VAST MAJORITY of news consumers aren't' smart enough to discern what's bullshite and what isn't. And maybe that's just enough for the left to takeover in 2028. Congratulations, you just played yourself.

Or, now hear me out, we let the investigation run it's course and if they say nothing is there, then we demand to see the investigation.
This post was edited on 7/28/25 at 1:08 pm
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
56654 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

They didnt thin k they would lose to Trump


This is pretty obvious, especially when you look at the last minute auto-pen pardons from the Biden admin.

quote:

They fricked with the files after the election


Very plausible. I'm not sure why anyone would ever trust today's Democrats to not try to sabotage a POTUS and his admin after a fabricated dossier to sway the 2016 election, 2 impeachments, 2 assassination attempts, and indictments based off of fictitious "crimes" prosecuted by leftist judges.

What more proof do you smooth brains need?
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
45795 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 1:12 pm to
I think you are right. No matter what comes out, people wont drop the obsession. I think they understand the shitstorm they'll start when they drop a years-long trove of documents filled with various names - names of mostly innocent people and no real evidence to implicate those people. This may be an effort to taint the drop, giving them an excuse to forgo prosecutions and hopefully avoid being sued into oblivion by the finest lawyers on the planet.
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
26744 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Weren't the files obtained by the feds during Trump's first administration?

Also, if they had planted his name in those files, they'd have done it to release it during the election. That time has come and gone.


I think the purpose of the plant would be to claim that Trump himself released the documents, so they couldn't be blamed for it. If they planted evidence in the files and then released it, Trump would claim it's a hoax and everyone would believe it. But if Trump is the one who releases the hoax?
Posted by theronswanson
House built with my hands
Member since Feb 2012
3182 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Or, now hear me out, we let the investigation run it's course and if they say nothing is there, then we demand to see the investigation.


What investigation is that?? The corrupt DOJ and FBI have had years to investigate. That’s the problem. It’s a global cabal and the elites are running interference. How is it that only two people have been charged on this??
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
463653 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 1:26 pm to
I think he could have been around when something happened. Not anything to make him liable in any way or even him having direct knowledge, but just enough to permit a terrible implication/association to run wild.

Or yes, other people.
This post was edited on 7/28/25 at 1:27 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
463653 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 1:28 pm to
Mike Baker got into this a bit on the latest JRE episode, although his commentary on the Russiagate was much better.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
463653 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

They didnt thin k they would lose to Trump


In 2024?

They knew. That's why they picked the sacrificial lamb in Kamala
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
161528 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 1:32 pm to
"Those files were run by my enemy, if there was anything in there they would have released them".

Then he name drops Christopher Steele in The UK.
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
32961 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

In 2024?

Joe didnt drop out until July

They hadnt touched those files at that point. Quit defending the criminals in govt.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
463653 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Joe didnt drop out until July

They hadnt touched those files at that point.


That sounds like literally the perfect time to trot that out, doesn't it?

When the chances of Trump losing flipped to winning?

For a "Deep State" that can insert fake information into evidence a Trump admin had for 18 months, AND create a nearly 10-year long conspiracy to abuse the deep state to hurt Trump, it seems like a major miss, doesn't it?
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
82579 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

That's why they picked the sacrificial lamb in Kamala
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
8412 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 1:56 pm to
Not saying it's true but it wouldn't exactly be the most surprising thing... after what they've done, and have tried to do, to that dude the last several years.
Posted by Rip Torn
Member since Mar 2020
5463 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 3:08 pm to
I err on the side of common sense and there is no secret list of child molesters. You aren’t doing anything other than feigning outrage
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
292684 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 3:09 pm to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
292684 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 3:10 pm to
quote:


They didnt thin k they would lose to Trump


They ran the worst candidate in history.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
70934 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

Weren't the files obtained by the feds during Trump's first administration?

Yes.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
70934 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

They didnt thin k they would lose to Trump

They sure put a hell of a lot of effort into destroying the man for a bunch of people who thought running a potato or his drunk, cackling sidekick would be an easy win.

This whole line of thought makes no sense when you look at the totality of the Democrat's actions.
Posted by PorkSammich
North FL
Member since Sep 2013
16564 posts
Posted on 7/28/25 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

Grand Jury testimony is never released.


Trump knows that, which is why he called for them to be released bc he knew it wouldn’t happen.

It’s crazy how bad he’s botched this.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram