- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Please tell me why some Republicans on here are against witnesses being called?
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:48 pm to roadGator
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:48 pm to roadGator
quote:
Hunter is going to plead the fifth. What good does that do?
And Bolton & Mulvaney will plead executive privilege. Schiff and whistleblower on the other hand.....well
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:49 pm to udtiger
quote:
First - it's a matter of process. It is improper for the Senate to call any witnesses.
Well that blanket statement just isn't true.
quote:
This is the equivalent of the prosecution and defense resting in a criminal case, but then certain jurors demanding that new witnesses be called.
It is well established that a court/judge can call witnesses not called by either party.
quote:
Second - the impeachment trial (and the impeachment itself) is nothing but a political hit job and distraction. The Senate cannot conduct business while the trial is going on.
This part is true.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:49 pm to 225bred
Because Trump is guilty of the charges as presented and they don’t want to admit they’ve been bamboozled by Fox News.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:50 pm to 225bred
It would probably help if a crime has been committed.
Obstruction of Congress is also known as policy disagreements, when the house has a different majority party than the president
Obstruction of Congress is also known as policy disagreements, when the house has a different majority party than the president
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:50 pm to texashorn
quote:
Because Trump is guilty of the charges as presented and they don’t want to admit they’ve been bamboozled by Fox News.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:50 pm to LaTexSaint
quote:
Because if witnesses come out, Trump will be exposed.
You can't have that.
Like in the house when the libs could call anyone they wanted?
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:50 pm to texashorn
If so, then vote and convict him.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:50 pm to 225bred
Because witnesses won’t satisfy the Dems. They will intentionally twist words and interpret things differently that normal people in order to stretch this out indefinitely
Do you honestly envision a scenario where Schumer and Schiff say, “you know what? maybe Trump was innocent this whole time? we agree to drop the case”
Do you honestly envision a scenario where Schumer and Schiff say, “you know what? maybe Trump was innocent this whole time? we agree to drop the case”
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:51 pm to texashorn
A Longhorn and stupid. A rare combination.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:51 pm to 225bred
because its a scam, one witness will say blah blah blah, requiring another witness for shite the first witness brought up. once you open the door its not closing and they will be calling witnesses well into next year and even after the election.
the whole point is to prevent senators from being able to campaign so the dimms can take control of the senate
thats all this is about, taking control back because they know they cant beat trump but with control of both houses they can impeach him just for winning re-election and then they win by playing long ball
the whole point is to prevent senators from being able to campaign so the dimms can take control of the senate
thats all this is about, taking control back because they know they cant beat trump but with control of both houses they can impeach him just for winning re-election and then they win by playing long ball
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:52 pm to Janky
quote:
Like in the house when the libs could call anyone they wanted?
Would you please show a smidgen of intellectual honesty? The subpoenas were ignored or disputed.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:52 pm to texashorn
quote:
Because Trump is guilty of the charges as presented
And yet, no factual material evidence of any of it.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:52 pm to 225bred
quote:
ssage Please tell me why some Republicans on here are against witnesses being called?
Because it’s a charade to simply draw out an impeachment that should have never started in the first place.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:52 pm to keakar
The only useful witness that could be called is one who can read Trump's mind. And then we would be convicting a President of thinking.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:53 pm to 225bred
I'm not a Republican but I'm against calling witnesses because this whole thing is some kangaroo court bullshite and needs to end.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:53 pm to 225bred
Because its all a sham. Dems don't care and will all vote party line just to drag this out to score points against Trump.
Mittens has a grudge against Trump and he is manipulating the other 3 who are vulnerable in their elections.
Mittens has a grudge against Trump and he is manipulating the other 3 who are vulnerable in their elections.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:53 pm to Centinel
quote:
And yet, no factual material evidence of any of it.
Put Mulvaney and Bolton under oath and let’s hear their side.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:54 pm to Midget Death Squad
Right. This impeccably timed "book leak" is no different than the similarly impeccably timed "new allegations" against Brett Kavanaugh that flowed in like a river during his Senate confirmation before vanishing like dust under the slightest scrutiny once democrats were done with them.
Its designed to buy time, rescue the pathetic case constructed by Schiff, and exert maximum political damage - nothing more. And we should not indulge this any further. If you want to put Hunter Biden on the stand, open a separate investigation.
Its designed to buy time, rescue the pathetic case constructed by Schiff, and exert maximum political damage - nothing more. And we should not indulge this any further. If you want to put Hunter Biden on the stand, open a separate investigation.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:54 pm to 225bred
quote:
Please tell me why some Republicans on here are against witnesses being called?
Because they are smart. Witnesses are being fought by the WH for a reason.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:54 pm to texashorn
quote:
Put Mulvaney and Bolton under oath and let’s hear their side.
Why didn't the House subpoena them?
And I'm glad you agree there is no factual material evidence.
Back to top


0









