Started By
Message

re: Please tell me why some Republicans on here are against witnesses being called?

Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:48 pm to
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
29117 posts
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

Hunter is going to plead the fifth. What good does that do?


And Bolton & Mulvaney will plead executive privilege. Schiff and whistleblower on the other hand.....well
Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
26568 posts
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

First - it's a matter of process. It is improper for the Senate to call any witnesses.


Well that blanket statement just isn't true.

quote:

This is the equivalent of the prosecution and defense resting in a criminal case, but then certain jurors demanding that new witnesses be called.


It is well established that a court/judge can call witnesses not called by either party.

quote:

Second - the impeachment trial (and the impeachment itself) is nothing but a political hit job and distraction. The Senate cannot conduct business while the trial is going on.


This part is true.

Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:49 pm to
Because Trump is guilty of the charges as presented and they don’t want to admit they’ve been bamboozled by Fox News.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
75480 posts
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:50 pm to
It would probably help if a crime has been committed.

Obstruction of Congress is also known as policy disagreements, when the house has a different majority party than the president
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
85655 posts
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

Because Trump is guilty of the charges as presented and they don’t want to admit they’ve been bamboozled by Fox News.
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

Because if witnesses come out, Trump will be exposed.

You can't have that.



Like in the house when the libs could call anyone they wanted?
Posted by timdonaghyswhistle
Member since Jul 2018
20807 posts
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:50 pm to
If so, then vote and convict him.
Posted by fillmoregandt
OTM
Member since Nov 2009
14368 posts
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:50 pm to
Because witnesses won’t satisfy the Dems. They will intentionally twist words and interpret things differently that normal people in order to stretch this out indefinitely


Do you honestly envision a scenario where Schumer and Schiff say, “you know what? maybe Trump was innocent this whole time? we agree to drop the case”

Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
22969 posts
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:51 pm to
A Longhorn and stupid. A rare combination.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30152 posts
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:51 pm to
because its a scam, one witness will say blah blah blah, requiring another witness for shite the first witness brought up. once you open the door its not closing and they will be calling witnesses well into next year and even after the election.

the whole point is to prevent senators from being able to campaign so the dimms can take control of the senate

thats all this is about, taking control back because they know they cant beat trump but with control of both houses they can impeach him just for winning re-election and then they win by playing long ball
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Like in the house when the libs could call anyone they wanted?

Would you please show a smidgen of intellectual honesty? The subpoenas were ignored or disputed.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44435 posts
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Because Trump is guilty of the charges as presented


And yet, no factual material evidence of any of it.

Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62024 posts
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

ssage Please tell me why some Republicans on here are against witnesses being called?


Because it’s a charade to simply draw out an impeachment that should have never started in the first place.
Posted by timdonaghyswhistle
Member since Jul 2018
20807 posts
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:52 pm to
The only useful witness that could be called is one who can read Trump's mind. And then we would be convicting a President of thinking.
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
28474 posts
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:53 pm to
I'm not a Republican but I'm against calling witnesses because this whole thing is some kangaroo court bullshite and needs to end.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
39892 posts
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:53 pm to
Because its all a sham. Dems don't care and will all vote party line just to drag this out to score points against Trump.

Mittens has a grudge against Trump and he is manipulating the other 3 who are vulnerable in their elections.
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

And yet, no factual material evidence of any of it.

Put Mulvaney and Bolton under oath and let’s hear their side.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46403 posts
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:54 pm to
Right. This impeccably timed "book leak" is no different than the similarly impeccably timed "new allegations" against Brett Kavanaugh that flowed in like a river during his Senate confirmation before vanishing like dust under the slightest scrutiny once democrats were done with them.

Its designed to buy time, rescue the pathetic case constructed by Schiff, and exert maximum political damage - nothing more. And we should not indulge this any further. If you want to put Hunter Biden on the stand, open a separate investigation.
Posted by 9th life
birmingham
Member since Sep 2009
7310 posts
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Please tell me why some Republicans on here are against witnesses being called?


Because they are smart. Witnesses are being fought by the WH for a reason.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44435 posts
Posted on 1/28/20 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Put Mulvaney and Bolton under oath and let’s hear their side.


Why didn't the House subpoena them?

And I'm glad you agree there is no factual material evidence.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram