
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Passing a law designating Islam as a political movement
Posted on 8/15/26 at 7:34 am to Boom33
Posted on 8/15/26 at 7:34 am to Boom33
No, you’re just not accepting reality as it is. Things change and survival requires the ability to adapt. Meanwhile, your approach is rooted in pure ideology and nostalgia for a period in history that no longer exists.
We’re being eaten alive by cancer in the form of Muslims, 3rd worlders, NGO’s and Marxists. You don’t want to treat the cancer. You want to play by “the rules” while our enemies exploit them and use them against us to grow stronger.
I have a question for you: did you support the actions our government took during WW2 or after 9/11?
We’re being eaten alive by cancer in the form of Muslims, 3rd worlders, NGO’s and Marxists. You don’t want to treat the cancer. You want to play by “the rules” while our enemies exploit them and use them against us to grow stronger.
I have a question for you: did you support the actions our government took during WW2 or after 9/11?
Posted on 8/15/26 at 7:35 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
They will once they take over. Logically it would be better to beat them to the punch.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 7:43 am to ArHog
Muslims have been in Michigan, New York, California, and Illinois way before Obama or Biden were in office.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 8:03 am to ronricks
quote:
Muslims have been in Michigan, New York, California, and Illinois way before Obama or Biden were in office.
I only remember the Mexicans Reagan allowed in Cali.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 8:33 am to TFH
quote:
Go ahead and ignore that this country was founded on separation of church and state and that their church is their state
Exactly.
We must preserve separation of church and state by banning religions that feature the church and state as inseparable.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 8:38 am to The Boat
I don't believe any of this hog wash! Just like all the rest of the dumb shite. Foot washing, mosques, Islam taking over. I'll do my part to help insure the sand people never get a foot hold in the USA.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 8:42 am to Brosef Stalin
quote:
Are you ok with the Democrats banning Christianity because that's what comes next?
Easy way around that. Christianity takes all positions in the Government. We do it the other way around, ban atheists and agnostics and deport them to the Middle East as well to live with all the Muslims they "love" so much.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 8:46 am to Boom33
quote:
You guys want to destroy a principle the country was founded on because you're a bunch of scared chicken littles who are too dumb to realize you are doing exactly what you accuse them of.
I don't care. As long as our culture, including our foundation based on Judeo-Christian principles, is preserved, I'm okay updating a part of the Constitution that needs updated.
The Constitution never anticipated an invasion by Muslims or the Third World. As far as I'm concerned, they have no rights here. Make Christianity the official religion of the U.S. and get the Muslims out of here, by force if necessary.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 9:18 am to Boom33
quote:
Why do you hate freedom?
Good lord at this nonsense
Posted on 8/15/26 at 9:21 am to TheMagicMan
quote:
TheMagicMan
Posted on 8/15/26 at 9:21 am to djsdawg
quote:
Good lord at this nonsense
I know, right? fricking freedom sucks, man.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 9:23 am to Boom33
quote:
Because I'm not supporting another group, I'm supporting the constitution and everyone's rights.
You are supporting Muslims right to destroy your rights because muh constitution.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 9:24 am to The Boat
I agree. It is a religion within a political movement that seeks world domination. Conservatives need to push back hard right now regarding the significance of communism and muslim ideology upon our society.
This current movement must be ended now.
This current movement must be ended now.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 9:25 am to Boom33
quote:
So because the constitution doesn't come with a dictionary, we get to pretend they mean whatever we as a way of bypassing the constitution to take away the rights of people?
And you don't see or have a problem with that?
The problem is those who would use the Constitution as a noose. In every Muslim-majority country - Every. Single. One. - Islam has pushed out personal freedoms to enough degrees that the US is scores ahead of them. While we have laws establishing strong protections including criticism of religion and government), religious liberty (and freedom from religion), assembly, press, due process, and individual autonomy in personal life, they often have little or none.
In Muslim-majority countries, these are constrained to varying degrees by things like:
-Blasphemy or apostasy laws
-Restrictions on criticism of Islam or the government
-Unequal rights for women, religious minorities, and LGBT people
-Weaker independent judiciaries or limits on political opposition
quote:
Why do you hate freedom?
Your stance is that any law which would slow Muslim demographic growth in the United States is an attack on freedom.
We know, as a consistent empirical pattern, that once Muslims become the majority in a society, measured personal freedoms (speech, religion, apostasy, women’s rights, LGBT rights, criticism of religion, etc.) fall well below the level that currently exists in the United States. Ergo, if unrestricted Muslim demographic growth continues and eventually produces a Muslim majority, the United States will very likely end up with less freedom than it has today.
Here is the choice your pathological altruism ignores: Are you willing to accept that long-term reduction in freedom for the existing population and their descendants in order to avoid any restriction on the growth of one particular religious group right now?
If the answer is yes, then you are prioritizing the unrestricted right of that group to become the majority over the preservation of the higher-freedom order that currently exists.
If the answer is no, then some form of limitation is justified and the claim that ‘any restriction is an attack on freedom’ (paraphrased) collapses.
Which one is it? Do you choose to limit the freedom of others to preserve your own and that of your society, culture and country or do you choose to give that other group freedom enough to eventually take yours and that of everyone else?
And before you answer, understand that history shows us there is no third option.
This post was edited on 8/15/26 at 9:29 am
Posted on 8/15/26 at 9:35 am to The Boat
Here come the dumb as dogshit fake conservatives to upvote suppression of religion as long as it's not THEIRS.
This place is pathetic sometimes.
This place is pathetic sometimes.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 9:50 am to The Boat
We already have rules against politicking from the pulpit and for maintaining the separation of church and state. The problem is that they are only seemingly enforced against white Christians. We should be applying those same rules to everyone.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 9:50 am to Gusoline
quote:
Here come the dumb as dogshit fake conservatives to upvote suppression of religion as long as it's not THEIRS.
This place is pathetic sometimes.
Feel free to answer the question I posed in the post just above yours. Considering the aggressiveness of our post, I doubt you will but I invite you nonetheless.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 9:55 am to Boom33
Islam is a hate organization with a stated goal of making everyone of earth comfort to their beliefs or be killed.
Why to you hate freedom?
American was founded on Christian foundation of religion. It starts and ends there. If you deny Christ or do not accept Christ the savior, GTFO.
It really is that simple if we had leaders with guts and balls.
Why to you hate freedom?
American was founded on Christian foundation of religion. It starts and ends there. If you deny Christ or do not accept Christ the savior, GTFO.
It really is that simple if we had leaders with guts and balls.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 9:56 am to The Boat
This should have been done 100 years ago.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 9:57 am to The Boat
I will take your support to back this. Send money guns and lawyers cuz I will need it.
Stand in the Gap.
Stand in the Gap.

Popular
Back to top


0












