Started By
Message

re: Pahlavi Prepares FINAL Iran Uprising - UK Joining Trump In Fighting IRGC - Frig' UK!!

Posted on 7/23/26 at 10:02 pm to
Posted by mailman85
Kentucky
Member since Mar 2013
385 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 10:02 pm to
Why isn't he over there fighting for his beloved country instead of relying on Americans dying for another country. Oh that's right he isn't the rightful leader just another puppet of our government.
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
91957 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 10:08 pm to
quote:

I dont think its yours's either.



it's not. he just interjects his cuck self into topics to be a contrarian shite disturber.

LINK

here is a snippet of link above

quote:
You've forgotten the brutal dictator that we installed who oppressed them for like 26 years from 1953 to 1979.



this has been rebutted over and over.

the USSR was in iran after WW2. Do you remember what truman told russia concerning iran? the tudeh party was the comunist party in iran. There was concerns they would take over and possibly allow an annex of iran.... ya know like their neighbors who were part of the USSR? removing mosadegh was purely cold war tactics so that would not happen.

the links have been posted here a million times
Posted by kilo
No block, no rock
Member since Oct 2011
30436 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

People often forget...they were protesting the poor economic conditions.


The clear solution is to destroy the very source of the charity.



Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
175410 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 10:11 pm to
Solution to what problem exactly?
Posted by geoag58
Member since Nov 2011
2308 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 10:11 pm to
Pathetic attempt
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481107 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

this has been rebutted over and over.

Update: It has not because it's a fact

quote:

the USSR was in iran after WW2. Do you remember what truman told russia concerning iran? the tudeh party was the comunist party in iran. There was concerns they would take over and possibly allow an annex of iran.... ya know like their neighbors who were part of the USSR? removing mosadegh was purely cold war tactics so that would not happen.


Update: None of this is responsive to the fact that the Shah was a brutal dictator

This post was edited on 7/23/26 at 10:13 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481107 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

Pathetic attempt


It's not an attempt. It's me stating the truth.

The Shah was Muslim. A devout, Shia Muslim, to be exact.

Iran was a Shia Muslim nation under the Shah, as it has been since the early 1500s

These are all facts. You can try to dispute them all you want but you're wrong.
This post was edited on 7/23/26 at 10:13 pm
Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
20213 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

Do you think he was Christian or...atheist, or...what?
there are degrees

the Shah and his family:



his immediate successor and his family:

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481107 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

there are degrees


I neve said otherwise. You're not being responsive to anything I've stated or argued.
Posted by JasonDBlaha
Woodlands, Texas
Member since Apr 2023
5153 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

The Shah was modernizing Iran.


In some ways, sure. But he was still a brutal ruler who routinely executed political dissents and journalists. The fact that people like him and MBS are considered “moderate” rulers by Middle Eastern standards just goes to show how arse-backwards that entire region is, both culturally and politically.

People don’t know about this but there were protests against the Shah in 1978 and he had hundreds of them shot and killed. Look it up.

At this point, the only way for Iran to be saved as a country is basically for the IRGC to be destroyed and religion to be rewritten out of their constitution. It needs to be a completely secular country with a secular government for there to be any peace and long-term prosperity. Unfortunately the likelihood of that happening is about on par with my chances of becoming an astronaut.
This post was edited on 7/23/26 at 10:34 pm
Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
20213 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

You're not being responsive to anything I've stated or argued.
you state that Iran was a brutal Shiite dictatorship under both the Shah and Khomeni

if that were so, why did the former allow his countrymen to travel to the West for liberal education in secular universities, while the latter did not?
Posted by kilo
No block, no rock
Member since Oct 2011
30436 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

Solution to what problem exactly?


Are you reading directly from "Rules for Radicals"

Honest question.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481107 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

you state that Iran was a brutal Shiite dictatorship under both the Shah and Khomeni


Iran remained both Muslim and Shia under both totalitarian regimes. Those are undisputable facts.

Both being brutal is subjective, but not really in dispute by anyone serious.

Trying to get into the weeds about the slight differences in policy/tactics of the brutal, Shia, and Muslim totalitarian regimes is not efficient or effective, I would argue. They're both terrible.
This post was edited on 7/23/26 at 10:35 pm
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
69193 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 10:38 pm to
Islamic cUcKs
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
26918 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 10:43 pm to
Counselor, you lie. The government was not as it is now it was far more secular in nature.,Women were not forced to wear the hijab you saw them in western attire.

When the Shah was deposed the government became hardcore Shia Muslim., run by the mullahs. But you know this.

quote:

The Shah was Islamic and Iran was Islamic under the Shah's reign of terror
Posted by geoag58
Member since Nov 2011
2308 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 10:43 pm to
If you could figure out how to argue with yourself everyone would be much happier.
Posted by geoag58
Member since Nov 2011
2308 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 10:49 pm to
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
31696 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 11:23 pm to
quote:

Both run terrible totalitarian Muslim states but do their totalitarian terror in different ways.


Wtf? The Shah ran a secular totalitarian Government, sir.
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
20563 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 4:11 am to
Bunk,

Do you even read the shite you post. "The people of Iran shared the Supreme Leaders position of opposing a nuclear weapon six to one a decade ago".

WTF your article is stating the IRGC did not want a nuke.......while they were spending billions building one?????

Here is a simple AI answer, and keep in mind these are people who will voice an opinion openly so its probably far higher....

quote:

Independent polling indicates that roughly 64% to 80% of Iranians desire a fundamental change or complete replacement of the current political system.
Posted by OccamsStubble
Member since Aug 2019
10440 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 5:17 am to
quote:

We need to turn you know who loose with its regime change plans


Nah, we should continue to fight their war while they sit on the sidelines laughing at us and sending us a list of gear they expect us to ship them. Meanwhile, I’m headed out this morning to apply for a fourth job to pay for their welfare.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram