- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ossoff outspending all federal candidates this year. More than AOC and Rashida Tlaib. Why?
Posted on 7/25/26 at 6:30 pm to tarzana
Posted on 7/25/26 at 6:30 pm to tarzana
quote:
Kalshi/538 give him a 90% chance to be reelected to the Senate. 90/10 doesn't seem like a close race IMO
Ossoff has a lead with younger and unmotivated voters (not my opinion - it's in the polls). Collins leads substantially among likely voters. Guess we'll see in November who turns out. I didn't vote for Collins in the primary, so he's not "my guy" but I can see beyond the astroturfing. Ossoff is widely seen as the most vulnerable D senate seat. That is why the money is being spent. It makes no sense otherwise.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 6:36 pm to TerryDawg03
quote:
Ossoff has appealed to a lot of folks
It's because he's appeared on ballots in Georgia for almost 20 years. I don't know if he's accomplished anything for anyone (I left ATL in 08), but name recognition is king when it comes to low information voters, which is what most voters are.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 6:39 pm to Warboo
quote:
Did he though? I would say that is why they are spending a ton of money. Georgia is much redder than 2020 shows. It would be a shame if their hopeful future presidential candidate does not win back his senate seat
THIS is the reason!!! Without cheating, Marxist Dems have no chance.
All they had was "Trump bad", now they have real commies saying the quiet part out loud!!
The Marxist Democratic party is done.
Sit back and watch!
Posted on 7/25/26 at 6:43 pm to Timeoday
quote:
Why?
He’s a potential Democrat presidential candidate.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 6:45 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
Without cheating, Marxist Dems have no chance.
All they had was "Trump bad", now they have real commies saying the quiet part out loud!!
The Marxist Democratic party is done.
Nah, D lost GA by 48-51.
Clayton 85-15 D
COBB! 57-42 D
Dekalb 82-17 D
Fulton 72-27 D
You've accounted for most of the population of the state right there.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 6:47 pm to TBoy
quote:
He’s a potential Democrat presidential candidate.
Why aren't all of the other potential candidates spending that much?
Posted on 7/25/26 at 6:49 pm to Timeoday
The Georgia Senate race will be extremely close maybe the closest this round. This election will have a large impact on who controls the Senate.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 6:49 pm to LemmyLives
quote:
Nah, D lost GA by 48-51. Clayton 85-15 D COBB! 57-42 D Dekalb 82-17 D Fulton 72-27 D You've accounted for most of the population of the state right there.
With a half arse legitimate election would those numbers be different? I would bet a lot on it.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 6:50 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:
Why aren't all of the other potential candidates spending that much?
Having more money on hand is a measure of how many people with money think you may have a shot at winning.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 6:53 pm to TBoy
quote:
Having more money on hand is a measure of how many people with money think you may have a shot at winning.
Like Kamala’s $2B? How’d that turn out?
Posted on 7/25/26 at 6:58 pm to HonoraryCoonass
quote:
Like Kamala’s $2B? How’d that turn out?
Do you have a head injury or something? Topics-stick to them if you are mentally able.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:06 pm to TBoy
quote:
Do you have a head injury or something? Topics-stick to them if you are mentally able.
You brought it up regarding having more money on hand. So he simply wanted to see if you had discovered a trend. Obviously you didn't, so you went off topic regarding money on hand.
Ossoff is having to present what he is not by making it up. He is obviously having to spend more making it up because there is so much to make up.
Do you prefer makeup too?
This post was edited on 7/25/26 at 7:40 pm
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:17 pm to Warboo
quote:
With a half arse legitimate election would those numbers be different?
Right, because the local election boards, the secretary of state, etc. are all of a sudden going to make things legit after seven years?
DeKalb wouldn't change at all. Raging liberal hellhole. Same with Clayton, Fulton will never change (Fani Willis anyone?) The fact that Cobb used to be the conservative bastion in the metro area and is +15D means it's lost too.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:30 pm to LemmyLives
quote:
It's because he's appeared on ballots in Georgia for almost 20 years.
20 years ago he was in college.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:34 pm to lazlodawg
quote:well it’s midterms, they’re gonna be motivated
Ossoff has a lead with younger and unmotivated voters (not my opinion - it's in the polls).
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:38 pm to bird35
quote:
The Georgia Senate race will be extremely close maybe the closest this round. This election will have a large impact on who controls the Senate.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:39 pm to Timeoday
He's taking credit for what Trump did in his first admin. And the hapless GOP here in GA has no response.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 8:02 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
well it’s midterms, they’re gonna be motivated
I don't think low-propensity voters are more likely to vote in midterm elections. Usually just the opposite.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 8:03 pm to Wally Sparks
2016 is when I first saw him on the ballot. I believe he lost that election to Karen Handel. But he was still young then, and had not become an icon yet
Posted on 7/25/26 at 8:08 pm to lazlodawg
quote:
lazlodawg
"What do you know?!?"
- tardzana in TX
Popular
Back to top


3







