- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official Pillow Guy Symposium: only flat-earthers remain excited
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:42 am to GeauxGutsy
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:42 am to GeauxGutsy
Wayyyyyyyy to much info with a very sloppy presentation. Mike had a chance to lay this out in the simplest of terms, but failed.
This is embarrassing.
This is embarrassing.
0
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:42 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Harris said there was no need to bring up Soros, but Marie Harf agreed with her.
Newt was all "WTAF?"
I wonder why she would do that...
quote:
Harf began her career at the Directorate of Intelligence at the CIA as an analyst focusing on Middle Eastern leadership issues. She later became the media spokesperson of the CIA.[6] During the 2012 presidential election, she reportedly helped craft U.S. President Barack Obama's national security and communications strategy, and also served as campaign spokesperson on national security issues.[5][6] In June 2013, Harf was appointed Deputy Spokesperson for the Department of State, where she served as deputy under Jen Psaki.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:42 am to BuckyCheese
quote:Harris seemed to be listening to a producer in her earphone telling her to "move on" from allowing Gingrich to speak anything about Soros the nazi sympathizer and the destroyer of countries
Wasn't it the other broad that jumped in a said "we don't need to talk about Soros" and Faulkner just kinda let it go or am I misremembering?
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:42 am to oklahogjr
quote:Yeah, we have too many shallow individuals who look at form over substance and will be turned off by this and ignore the important information.
This whole thing has been a great example of what being unprepared to present looks like
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:43 am to FooManChoo
This shite is infuriating. I'm primed and they can't get the fricking audio right.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:44 am to oklahogjr
Could they not have rehearsed this? Can't hear Ron, can hear Ron. This is sad.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:44 am to FooManChoo
Omg. Plug a pair of headphones into the laptop.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:44 am to FooManChoo
quote:
Yeah, we have too many shallow individuals who look at form over substance and will be turned off by this and ignore the important information.
Agreed, but this is genuinely embarrassing.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:45 am to Poohbear8487
quote:
Poohbear8487
Every time I see your name I think of poodlebrain and it makes me sad. I wish he was around during all this (even though he might be glad he isn't.) RIP
Carry on.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:45 am to FooManChoo
It's hard to accept any of this as "important information" if it appears the people who are putting it together are total amateurs.
If they can't get a simple Teams meeting working, and convey anything of substance, how do people trust that the conclusions they made are accurate or correct?
If they can't get a simple Teams meeting working, and convey anything of substance, how do people trust that the conclusions they made are accurate or correct?
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:47 am to Jax Teller
They have had months to prep this. I think codemonkey is there to make them look foolish.
OMG it is the same stuff Ron Watkins boomed on social media and it was a scan of a manual, or is it the stuff the Peters whistle blower fed Ron coming?
OMG it is the same stuff Ron Watkins boomed on social media and it was a scan of a manual, or is it the stuff the Peters whistle blower fed Ron coming?
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:48 am to FooManChoo
quote:
Yeah, we have too many shallow individuals who look at form over substance and will be turned off by this and ignore the important information.
If you don't see how the amateur-level presentation of this supposedly groundbreaking information undermines the credibility of Lindell/the whole symposium, I don't know what to tell you. They hyped this for weeks if not longer, and supposedly have had the information for even longer than that. How hard would it have been to bring the production value up to above that of a middle school science fair?
Professionalism and coherence matter for credibility, particularly when discussing what is supposed to be the most important information in the country's history.
This post was edited on 8/11/21 at 10:50 am
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:48 am to Jax Teller
quote:
This shite is infuriating. I'm primed and they can't get the fricking audio right.
can’t run an aux cord and select the correct input but can obtain and interpret data showing an election was hacked 
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:48 am to GRTiger
quote:
Every time I see your name I think of poodlebrain and it makes me sad. I wish he was around during all this (even though he might be glad he isn't.) RIP
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:48 am to GRTiger
I loved poodlebrain and miss his posts--RIP.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:48 am to OldManRiver
quote:It sounds like they focused on putting together a team of experts in everything but logistics in putting a conference together.
It's hard to accept any of this as "important information" if it appears the people who are putting it together are total amateurs.
If they can't get a simple Teams meeting working, and convey anything of substance, how do people trust that the conclusions they made are accurate or correct?
It's frustrating but we have to look at the information, not the quality of the presentation of the information.
This post was edited on 8/11/21 at 10:49 am
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:49 am to OldManRiver
quote:
how do people trust that the conclusions they made are accurate or correct?
Because it is so obvious that xiden didn't get 81!
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:50 am to OldManRiver
quote:
It's hard to accept any of this as "important information" if it appears the people who are putting it together are total amateurs.
So you don’t accept the current administration in the White House.
Nothing is perfect. Stop expecting such.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:52 am to FooManChoo
quote:
It's frustrating but we have to look at the information, not the quality of the presentation of the information.
Wrong. No one is going to pay attention to this shite show. Would you buy from a company if their big pitch to you was this amateur?
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:52 am to Blitzed
So they are deleting all the electronic records of this past election? Yeah, that's not fishy at all.
Page 56 of 106
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News