Started By
Message

re: NYT: FBI sent honeypot posing as assistant to collect intel on trump aide during election

Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:09 pm to
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167573 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

You see what NYTs is doing, right?

Oh, but the FBI used spies and entrapment methods with good intentions because of the RUSSIANS!
Yep, they were brave and very alarmed and they were protecting America from the Russians.
quote:

The decision to use Ms. Turk in the operation aimed at a presidential campaign official shows the level of alarm inside the F.B.I. during a frantic period when the bureau was trying to determine the scope of Russia’s attempts to disrupt the 2016 election, but could also give ammunition to Mr. Trump and his allies for their spying claims.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63090 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Not only that. Now that we know beyond any reasonable doubt that Mueller has known from basically day 1 that collusion didn't happen, it outs the entire investigation as one long hail mary hoping to catch Trump in obstruction.



yup

quote:

Effectively, we had a Special Counsel that ONLY had the purpose of trying to create an obstruction trap. We didn't even have an investigation AT ALL of the thing the SC was started for in the first place because everyone fricking involved already knew that shite was false



yup

and a democratic party in the senate and house who, as of yesterday, is still trying to execute the Obstruction playbook.

This is sedition.
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
32762 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:15 pm to
I don’t have a problem with this. It’s not an obtrusive method of gathering info by investigators.

Honeypot is not the right term to use here btw.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37614 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:16 pm to
The crazy thing is that even here they readily admit they got nothing.....yet they kept going. Comey should have been fired for this alone.
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
42472 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

I don’t have a problem with this. It’s not an obtrusive method of gathering info by investigators.


What the frick
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127401 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:17 pm to
As long as it was counter-intelligence
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63090 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

I don’t have a problem with this


:youdontsay:

Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127401 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

I don’t have a problem with this.
Not surprised in the least bit.

So thankful the Fascist state was defeated in 2016.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
77768 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

I don’t have a problem with this. It’s not an obtrusive method of gathering info by investigators.


Posted by MisslePig
Member since Jul 2018
1174 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

I don’t have a problem with this.

Shocking.
quote:

It’s not an obtrusive method of gathering info by investigators.

The FBI sent in a spy to a political opposition campaign to gather "evidence". By definition it's obtrusive.
quote:

Honeypot is not the right term

They sent in a young, attractive secretary to gather information. By definition it's a Honeypot.

How intellectually dishonest can you be? Intellectually being a generous term.
This post was edited on 5/2/19 at 2:37 pm
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
65809 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:19 pm to
The key was if it’s predicated. And so far they have no reason to think it was, even after a full investigation, which makes it look like the Dems wanted to take Trump out, and they would have if he didn’t win.....and his whole family. This looks worse by the day that the last administration was corrupt to the core.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

I don’t have a problem with this. It’s not an obtrusive method of gathering info by investigators.

Honeypot is not the right term to use here btw.




Why were they spying on Trump team members? Why not notify them and work with them to get the Russian agents?
Posted by PanhandleTigah
Florida Freedom Zone
Member since May 2008
9452 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Decatur

DID NOT DISAPPOINT
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20931 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

I don’t have a problem with this. It’s not an obtrusive method of gathering info by investigators.

Honeypot is not the right term to use here btw.



You sound freaking pathetic
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
17967 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

Holy fricking shite


x 3000

It’s time.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90772 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

I don’t have a problem with this. It’s not an obtrusive method of gathering info by investigators.
Rexcatur is married to Lois Lerner!
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90772 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Why were they spying on Trump team members? Why not notify them and work with them to get the Russian agents?
Going out on a limb, you will get nothing from the Rexcatur class.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

The key was if it’s predicated. And so far they have no reason to think it was, even after a full investigation, which makes it look like the Dems wanted to take Trump out, and they would have if he didn’t win.....and his whole family.


This appears to be predicated but the predicate was false.

The FBI had to concoct a fake predicate in the Steele dossier and mislead the FISC court to obtain a FISA warrant. Everything after July 31 2016 was done under a FISA warrant illegally acquired. All spying before July 31 2016 was just illegal.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47624 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

I don’t have a problem with this. It’s not an obtrusive method of gathering info by investigators.

Honeypot is not the right term to use here btw.


Of course you don't.

This is the third spy that we've learned was sent into the Trump campaign by the feds. That doesn't count the mysterious circumstances surrounding people like Misfud and Veselnitskaya - who were almost certainly plants by Fusion.

At what point are you going to hold the administration accountable for doing all of this on the strength of a piece of campaign smear that they knew was tripe? Furthermore, how would you feel if all of this had been done to Obama by Bush - based on birtherism? Don't answer because I cant fricking stand to read lies.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
68513 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

I don’t have a problem with this.


This is my shocked face...your side is willing to do whatever it takes, legal or not, to win
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 17
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 17Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram