- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NSA Whistleblower: Agency ‘Absolutely’ Tapping Trump’s Calls.. concerned
Posted on 2/15/17 at 12:58 pm to Jjdoc
Posted on 2/15/17 at 12:58 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
I think you are missing the point or ignoring it.
No I think the subject of the interview is making claims that aren't true or at least not supported by any public evidence.
0
Posted on 2/15/17 at 12:59 pm to Jjdoc
Once again your thread title is bs. And you linked breitbart again so it's bs baws off of bs.
And apparently you don't understand there are written transcripts of calls with foreign leaders. No tapping necessary.
But shill on shill
And apparently you don't understand there are written transcripts of calls with foreign leaders. No tapping necessary.
But shill on shill
Posted on 2/15/17 at 12:59 pm to montanagator
quote:
So you don't think the NSA should try and root out spies and collaborators?
I have a great idea. Now that Trump is in office, let's allow him to decide who those people are and target them with the people he places in power.
You good with that!
Posted on 2/15/17 at 1:00 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
LOL! That's your link?
LOL! Your OP is from Breitbart!
Posted on 2/15/17 at 1:01 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
I have a great idea. Now that Trump is in office, let's allow him to decide who those people are and target them with the people he places in power.
The President should decide who foreign spies are, and not our spies. Gotcha.
This post was edited on 2/15/17 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 2/15/17 at 1:02 pm to montanagator
quote:Trump is infallible and omnipotent. Every single one of his hires is a home run and and true American. The intelligence agencies should stop wasting time on investigations and instead ask Trump who the bad guys are.
So you don't think the NSA should try and root out spies and collaborators?
Posted on 2/15/17 at 1:03 pm to UHTiger
quote:Plus I think for the Australia call it's bloody obvious that the leak was someone in the room at Turnbull's end, not ours.
And apparently you don't understand there are written transcripts of calls with foreign leaders. No tapping necessary.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 1:04 pm to Jjdoc
Who was treated worse Manafort or Flynn?
It's not their fault Trump aides were in constant contact with Russia during his campaign.
It's not their fault Trump aides were in constant contact with Russia during his campaign.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 1:04 pm to MizzouBS
quote:
Only Trumpsters see a difference in the leaks.
Trump is "Treated so Badly". Damn media
No.
1) Information, once it is out cannot be ignored and must be dealt with, regardless of it's source.
2) Leakers of classified information, including those who unwillingly cause the release, should be identified and dealt with according to the law.
Next?
Posted on 2/15/17 at 1:06 pm to UHTiger
quote:
Previously, the N.S.A. filtered information before sharing intercepted communications with another agency, like the C.I.A. or the intelligence branches of the F.B.I. and the Drug Enforcement Administration. The N.S.A.’s analysts passed on only information they deemed pertinent, screening out the identities of innocent people and irrelevant personal information.
Now, other intelligence agencies will be able to search directly through raw repositories of communications intercepted by the N.S.A. and then apply such rules for “minimizing” privacy intrusions.
So partly true.
quote:
Under the new system, agencies will ask the N.S.A. for access to specific surveillance feeds, making the case that they contain information relevant and useful to their missions. The N.S.A. will grant requests it deems reasonable after considering factors like whether large amounts of Americans’ private information might be included and, if so, how damaging or embarrassing it would be if that information were “improperly used or disclosed.”
And maybe partly false. But I trust government to do nothing according to its own internal rules. So not sure how accurate this all is.
LINK
Posted on 2/15/17 at 1:06 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
2) Leakers of classified information, including those who unwillingly cause the release, should be identified and dealt with according to the law.
Does this include Assange and Snowden, or are they different because they are Trump's friends?
Posted on 2/15/17 at 1:07 pm to TN Bhoy
quote:
The President should decide who foreign spies are, and not our spies. Gotcha.
Not individual spies, each with their own agenda. The President set's the country's agenda and the bureaucrats follow it. Yes, that is the way it is supposed to work. I'm comfortable with that, within reason.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 1:07 pm to Jjdoc
Breitbart is the propaganda wing of the administration, as is Russia Today. Bring us something reputable.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 1:07 pm to TN Bhoy
quote:
Does this include Assange and Snowden, or are they different because they are Trump's friends?
My statements need no further clarification.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 1:07 pm to Jjdoc
There were people in the room during the conversations with Mexico and Australia. It didn't take a phone tap for someone in one of the two rooms to talk about it.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 1:08 pm to MizzouBS
quote:
Who was treated worse Manafort or Flynn?
Manafort's lucky that he's not sitting in a jail cell in Kyiv.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 1:08 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
We know Flynn has shared classified info before.
He has changed and now he was "Treated so Badly".
He has changed and now he was "Treated so Badly".
Posted on 2/15/17 at 1:09 pm to Iosh
quote:
Plus I think for the Australia call it's bloody obvious that the leak was someone in the room at Turnbull's end, not ours.
Nice use of bloody.
There are a ton of people who could leak the leaders calls, most notably a low level unhappy staffer. The president likely has 10-20 ppl in the room on all of these calls. Hell the picture of the putin call had 7 in the frame.
Plus the other end.
I sincerely hope the NSA is not tapping the president's calls, unless they have a very good reason to do so.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 1:26 pm to MizzouBS
It's one thing to be hacked by an external entity (i.e. Russians, other governments etc.) It is entirely different to have people within your own government intentionally give out and leak information that is classified just because you disagree with the person sitting in the WH.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 1:31 pm to Friscodog
quote:
It's one thing to be hacked by an external entity (i.e. Russians, other governments etc.) It is entirely different to have people within your own government intentionally give out and leak information that is classified just because you disagree with the person sitting in the WH.
Yet that's exactly what we have happening.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News