
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New DNA evidence from Jefferson's hair concludes he fathered children of Sally Hemings
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:35 pm to trinidadtiger
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:35 pm to trinidadtiger
And in other news we already knew, Sally Hemings determined to be black.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:42 pm to trinidadtiger
The question is how is Trump to blame?
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:54 pm to kywildcatfanone
This is somewhat different. What they did decades ago was find Y chromosome markers from the living male Jefferson descendants in a known descendent of Sally Hemmings (concluding that he had father descending from the Jefferson line). That didn't really differentiate particular Jefferson men, though, hence the Randolph vs. Thomas controversy that this is trying to sort out. Here they're claiming to have Thomas's hair with his nuclear DNA. That lets them compare DNA across both male & female descendant lines (old study couldn't do that). They also apparently included descendants of Randolph's line and modeled Thomas vs. Randolph and Randolph's sons.
The interesting questions now are whether the hair is securely TJ's & whether the methods really can distinguish those closely related possibilities as strongly as they're claiming. The paper is apparently still in peer review, so I'd like to see the actual methods behind the "1 in 1000" figure.
The interesting questions now are whether the hair is securely TJ's & whether the methods really can distinguish those closely related possibilities as strongly as they're claiming. The paper is apparently still in peer review, so I'd like to see the actual methods behind the "1 in 1000" figure.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:04 pm to winkchance
None of this is particularly important. Jefferson was one of the smartest and best educated of the Founders. His concept of a democratic republic was inspired. He’s heroic in my opinion…
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:07 pm to trinidadtiger
Okay so maybe they loved each other. Last time I checked Love is color blind.
This post was edited on 9/25/26 at 12:55 pm
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:08 pm to trinidadtiger
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:51 pm to trinidadtiger
quote:
And when you are looking at a task that requires someone of Daniel Boone's stature.....you chose a dainty.
In one corner, we have you claiming Lewis was dainty and weak and unfit for the task.
In the other corner, we have Lewis completing the first transcontinental journey without modern machinery.
What should I put more faith in? A remarkable verified accomplishment or the words of someone 200 years later?
Maybe your assessment is a little off.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:55 pm to VOR
quote:
Not shocking…
he caught the fevah. have you ever caught the fevah?
Posted on 9/24/26 at 2:19 pm to KCT
quote:
he wasn't part of the corrupt Political Establishment
quote:
non-Establishment
Posted on 9/24/26 at 2:24 pm to trinidadtiger
quote:Now run the genetic odds on his brother who, unlike TJ, is actually known to have "consorted with" slaves.
Odds are 1 in a 1000 he is not the father.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 2:24 pm to Jake88
C'mon, Jake. He and all his 8 sibs had trust funds just like the rest of us non-establishment types.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 2:25 pm to teke184
quote:Yes.
Wasn’t the thought that his brother was the father of those kids?
Posted on 9/24/26 at 3:25 pm to the808bass
quote:
Clara-Lee Nutt,
quote:
The tour guide’s head
quote:
Nutt’s DNA
quote:
It’s absolutely huge
I mean dammit

Popular
Back to top

1















