- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Muslims, Islamists, Jihadists, Terrorists
Posted on 6/4/17 at 10:44 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/4/17 at 10:44 am to SlowFlowPro
Thanks for this. I've gotten tired of explaining all this and the history behind it.
Posted on 6/4/17 at 10:45 am to Iosh
quote:
Nobody here seems very interested in asking why there has been a turn towards fundamentalism in the last half-century
Because Pan-Arabism failed. The only other thing to unite the violent cultures of Northern Africa and the Middle East is Islam, which was a last resort because the leaders of the Arab countries knew it could turn on them, like it did in Tunisia, Libya, Egypt and Syria.
Bottom line: it's about power.
This post was edited on 6/4/17 at 10:46 am
Posted on 6/4/17 at 10:46 am to Iosh
quote:
Nobody here seems very interested in asking why there has been a turn towards fundamentalism in the last half-century
The Jooooos?
Coca Cola?
LGBQTLFM?
Posted on 6/4/17 at 10:48 am to DownSouthJukin
Salafi/Wahabi jihadism is Pan-Arabism. It is what separates the Muslim Brotherhood, which is pan-Islamic, from these groups.
And everything failed in the Arab world. Nationalism, socialism, communism and democracy of an illiberal variety. For various reasons.
And everything failed in the Arab world. Nationalism, socialism, communism and democracy of an illiberal variety. For various reasons.
Posted on 6/4/17 at 10:48 am to TX Tiger
quote:
So you equate all Muslims with animals.
No. You just did.
Great job, prog. Now go lick Mohamed's sandals.
Posted on 6/4/17 at 10:48 am to SlowFlowPro
What do all four groups have in common?
(Hint, see #1)
(Hint, see #1)
Posted on 6/4/17 at 10:49 am to SlowFlowPro
What do all four groups have in common?
(Hint, see #1)
(Hint, see #1)
Posted on 6/4/17 at 10:50 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
Salafi/Wahabi jihadism is Pan-Arabism.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrotflmao.gif)
Posted on 6/4/17 at 10:50 am to DownSouthJukin
quote:
So you equate all Muslims with animals.
No. You just did.
Great job, prog. Now go lick Mohamed's sandals.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Complete and total ignorance. I expect nothing more from this board.
Thanks for the clear illustration, btw.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconcheers.gif)
Posted on 6/4/17 at 10:52 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
Salafi/Wahabi jihadism is Pan-Arabism.
No doubt that Islamic sympathies and tools (calling war "jihad") were used to attempt Pan-Arabism, but the Arab leaders from 1950-present did not want religion to dominate their cooperation or internal politics.
Posted on 6/4/17 at 10:53 am to Iosh
Am I wrong? It's the most immediate expression since the 60s, and while it pretends to be supra national, ISIS is dominated by Arabs, especially those from the KSA who get preferential treatment (relatively).
Posted on 6/4/17 at 10:54 am to crazy4lsu
quote:You're wrong. Pan-Arabism tended to be more secular than its opponents. Unfortunately it was also socialist and so certain countries who shall remain nameless tended to undermine it.
Am I wrong?
Here's the most well-known Pan-Arabist leader: LINK
Baathism was also a pan-Arabist movement and I'm sure you've heard of their two most famous leaders
This post was edited on 6/4/17 at 10:57 am
Posted on 6/4/17 at 10:57 am to TX Tiger
quote:Still waiting...
Muslims, Islamists, Jihadists, Terrorists
ok i may need to make/bump this thread every time a major attack happens and all the "WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT ALL MUSLIMS" shite starts up. this is a handy guide on how to use basic words to describe different groups within the Muslim community
here is a very brief description of the 4 groups
1. Muslims - these are people who believe in the tenets of Islam. there are more than 1B on earth
2. Islamists - a subgroup of Muslims who believe that Islam should merge with state power to regulate societies
3. Jihadists - a subgroup of Islamists who believe in using force/coercion to install an Islamic state
4. Terrorists - a subgroup of Islamists who use terror attacks on civilians and non-combatants to further Jihadism
Why the outrage over these POS, yet nothing of your own government that continues to create, fund, and train them to cause chaos while the establishment conducts regime change in the ME to make their next fortune and save a dollar system that otherwise has zero value?
I'll hang up and listen.
Posted on 6/4/17 at 10:59 am to Iosh
I know what Pan-Arabism is. Pan-Islamism doesn't describe what I mean exactly since the ethnic component plays such a large role in these groups. What I mean is they have the same impulse through different means, not that they are historically related. My apologies.
Posted on 6/4/17 at 11:01 am to SlowFlowPro
Not sure why the 50% downvotes. Did I miss something?
Posted on 6/4/17 at 11:06 am to SlowFlowPro
I am really trying to have an open mind and understand Muslim versus jihadists so I actually read through the following twitter thread. This Muslim breaks down why their religion and the Qur'an doesn't identify with this terrorism. Basically explains the terrorists are cherry picking. Read through his thread and let me know what you think.
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 6/4/17 at 11:07 am
Posted on 6/4/17 at 11:06 am to SlowFlowPro
Some Nazis who wanted to kill all the Jews and anyone not in their select
Some Nazis just wanted to force all non select people out of the country
Some Nazis just wanted policies that favored their select groups
Some Nazis just thought national socialism was better economically for their country
Some members of the KKK actively participated in lynchings and other violence towards blacks
Some members of the KKK just wanted blacks removed from the country
Some members of the KKK just thought white people were better than black people and wanted separate but equal
Some members of the KKK just thought white people were better than black people and really didn't give a frick about separate but equal they just wanted separate
Every last person in one of the above groups was a person deserving of shunning and shame and derision
So forgive me I don't give a frick if the Muslim down the road from me doesn't want to kill me. Well wanting to kill me is certainly the worst of the things it's not the only problem
Some Nazis just wanted to force all non select people out of the country
Some Nazis just wanted policies that favored their select groups
Some Nazis just thought national socialism was better economically for their country
Some members of the KKK actively participated in lynchings and other violence towards blacks
Some members of the KKK just wanted blacks removed from the country
Some members of the KKK just thought white people were better than black people and wanted separate but equal
Some members of the KKK just thought white people were better than black people and really didn't give a frick about separate but equal they just wanted separate
Every last person in one of the above groups was a person deserving of shunning and shame and derision
So forgive me I don't give a frick if the Muslim down the road from me doesn't want to kill me. Well wanting to kill me is certainly the worst of the things it's not the only problem
Posted on 6/4/17 at 11:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
your "point" doesn't make any sense
Lol my point is that Islam has so many different sects, divisions, branches, etc. that it is nearly impossible to define it like many try to do. Some believe Jihadism is ok, some believe jihadism is not ok, some believe jihadism is ok but they don't practice it themselves, some believe Jihadism is ok only in certain instances, some believe Jihadism is wrong but won't intervene, some believe its mis-interpreted, etc.
Posted on 6/4/17 at 11:11 am to SlowFlowPro
What responsibility do groups 1 and 2 have for reigning is the bullshite of groups 3 and 4? Cause I'm done with the left blaming people like me for the way they behave.
Posted on 6/4/17 at 11:13 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
What responsibility do groups 1 and 2 have for reigning is the bullshite of groups 3 and 4? Cause I'm done with the left blaming people like me for the way they behave.
Amen!!
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)