Started By
Message

Mike Johnson says that Congressmen should be able to trade stocks

Posted on 5/17/26 at 12:26 am
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
52399 posts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 12:26 am
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
55164 posts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 12:28 am to
Did he really say this?

Posted by ForeverGator
Elite 8 - 2020 Worst SECRant Poster
Member since Nov 2012
14331 posts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 12:30 am to
Wow.
Posted by timdonaghyswhistle
Member since Jul 2018
21236 posts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 12:30 am to
I can't believe somebody didn't stop him from throwing himself on top of this grenade with THAT argument.
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
52399 posts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 12:31 am to
Unless that's AI, yes, he said it.
Posted by Hondo Blacksheep
Member since Jul 2022
3373 posts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 12:32 am to
Man, talk about an unforced error ... geez ....
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
51047 posts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 12:37 am to
This is an example of why I voted against him. It was just a personal protest vote, but here's the thing with Mike Johnson. He certainly isn't the dirtiest man in Congress, but he isn't totally clean, either. He has that Establishment mindset, and it's indicative of why he would make a comment like this.

He spent too many years riding shotgun for Kevin McCarthy.
Posted by BuzzSaw 12
The Dark Side Of The Moon
Member since Dec 2010
7114 posts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 12:42 am to
frick you Mike



Let's make a deal Mike. How about you idiots can continue to trade stocks on insider information but only if 99% of the profits get redistributed to the tax payers.
Posted by armytiger96
Member since Sep 2007
2835 posts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 12:43 am to
They should be allowed to invest in index funds and only index funds.
Posted by wheelr
New Iberia
Member since Jul 2012
6182 posts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 12:47 am to
Do they not post the salary before these people blow millions campaigning for the position?
Posted by timdonaghyswhistle
Member since Jul 2018
21236 posts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 12:50 am to
quote:

Do they not post the salary before these people blow millions campaigning for the position?


These poor souls sacrifice themselves to be wined and dined by lobbyists, and who knows what else.
Posted by ataraxia
Member since May 2023
99 posts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 12:52 am to
Johnson is right.
This post was edited on 5/17/26 at 12:53 am
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
52399 posts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 12:56 am to
quote:

Johnson is right.
There needs to be curbs, and also need to be charged for using or revealing insider trading information.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
37250 posts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 1:06 am to
“And I have some sympathy,” not “we have to have sympathy.” If I’m shown to be wrong, that’s fine. But just as I suspected, this is out of context deception for ulterior purposes.
Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
29478 posts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 1:09 am to
quote:

Let's make a deal Mike. How about you idiots can continue to trade stocks on insider information but only if 99% of the profits get redistributed to the tax payers.


Why should they be allowed to do something that would get the rest of us thrown in jail?
Posted by Prettyboy Floyd
Pensacola, Florida
Member since Dec 2013
16831 posts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 1:13 am to
quote:


I can't believe somebody didn't stop him from throwing himself on top of this grenade with THAT argument.


They really live in their own world. Elitist pieces of shyt that get into congress so they can trade on insider info. It's all a game to these useless shyt bags and you are stuck with them. You can't get them the fk out of congress.
Posted by prouddawg
Member since Sep 2024
9648 posts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 1:15 am to
He said it some time ago, I don’t know if this is an additional time or not. Hey, at least he’s honest about his feelings. Personally, I’d be in favor of totally eliminating their ability to profit from the job apart from their salaries, and raise their pay some. That will get some downvotes, but they don’t make a lot given the DC cost of living.
Posted by Swampcat
Member since Dec 2003
12837 posts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 1:22 am to
I like Mike , but history tells us d.c. politicians cannot be trusted with the stock market and insider trading. Of course if all elected politicians had to disclose they stock trading etc to the people so he can share his insider training and maybe so.
Posted by demtigers73
Member since Aug 2014
6202 posts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 1:27 am to
Yeah, that's not the full clip bruh
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
37250 posts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 1:30 am to
I hate to say it, and it doesn’t necessarily mean anything in the bigger picture of life (or maybe it does), but probably most amongst us don’t really know what you’re referring to. They’d be like “And??” All of which is a bit disconcerting. Because context is quite important in, well, everything.
This post was edited on 5/17/26 at 1:32 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram