Started By
Message

Meanwhile in Texas

Posted on 1/8/21 at 2:33 pm
Posted by Ridgewalker
Member since Aug 2012
3559 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 2:33 pm
In Texas, State Representative Terry Meza (D-Irving) has introduced HB196. Her bill would repeal the state's "castle doctrine." This doctrine allows a homeowner to use deadly force against an armed intruder who breaks into his home.
Now listen to what she has to say...
"I'm not saying that stealing is okay," Meza explained. "All I'm saying is that it doesn't warrant a death penalty. Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection and to provide the householder an incentive to cooperate. They just want to get their loot and get away. When the resident tries to resist is when people get hurt. If only one side is armed fewer people will be killed."
Meza was quick to reassure that her bill "would not totally prevent homeowners from defending themselves.
Under the new law the homeowner's obligation is to flee the home at the first sign of intrusion. If fleeing is not possible he must cooperate with the intruder. But if violence breaks out it is the homeowner's responsibility to make sure no one gets hurt. The best way to achieve this is to use the minimum non-lethal force possible because intruders will be able to sue for any injuries they receive at the hands of the homeowner."
"In most instances the thief needs the money more than the homeowner does," Meza reasoned. "The homeowner's insurance we reimburse his losses. On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth. If my bill can help make this transfer a peaceful one so much the better."
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101404 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection


What The frick???
Posted by jlovel7
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
21310 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 2:34 pm to
This is outdated. It was eviscerated if I remember correctly.
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
49663 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

"I'm not saying that stealing is okay," Meza explained. "All I'm saying is that it doesn't warrant a death penalty. Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection and to provide the householder an incentive to cooperate. They just want to get their loot and get away. When the resident tries to resist is when people get hurt. If only one side is armed fewer people will be killed."


What the fricking frick?
Posted by glassman
Next to the beer taps at Finn's
Member since Oct 2008
116133 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 2:35 pm to
Delusional thinking. Shocking!!
Posted by HandGrenade
Member since Oct 2010
11225 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 2:35 pm to
Link
Posted by NPComb
Member since Jan 2019
27356 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 2:35 pm to
I refuse to post her pic. It’s worse than you can imagine. I do understand why she hates white males though.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422470 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

What The frick???

the next clause is 100x worse

it's so bad i have to make sure this isn't fake news

Yup. It's fake
This post was edited on 1/8/21 at 2:37 pm
Posted by unotiger21
Member since Sep 2010
934 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 2:35 pm to
LOL - can a resident democrat please respond to this.
Posted by TigerB8
End Communism
Member since Oct 2003
9293 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 2:36 pm to
That shite aint gonna fly in Texas. I've got to get to Texas. Not sure my wife will agree. Remember the Alamo!!!!!!
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99013 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 2:36 pm to
Clown world.

Time to go to this bitches home and take whatever you want.
Posted by PaperTiger
Ruston, LA
Member since Feb 2015
22941 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 2:36 pm to
Dumb rationalization.

Prove that someone is breaking into your home for the sole purpose of stealing something.

Posted by RougeDawg
Member since Jul 2016
5853 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 2:36 pm to
Flawed logic.
This post was edited on 1/13/21 at 7:25 am
Posted by lsu1919
Member since May 2017
3244 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 2:36 pm to
These people are either sick or stupid or both.

Either way I’m tired of all of their bullshite.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

"I'm not saying that stealing is okay," Meza explained. "All I'm saying is that it doesn't warrant a death penalty. Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection and to provide the householder an incentive to cooperate. They just want to get their loot and get away. When the resident tries to resist is when people get hurt. If only one side is armed fewer people will be killed."


I think this is what the kids used to call blaming the victim.

So...the homeowners should lie back and enjoy it, is that what she's saying?
Posted by Rex Feral
Athens
Member since Jan 2014
11330 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

"In most instances the thief needs the money more than the homeowner does," Meza reasoned. "The homeowner's insurance we reimburse his losses. On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth. If my bill can help make this transfer a peaceful one so much the better."


Are you mother fricking kidding me? Someone needs to hold up this crazy bitch and let her find out what an equitable distribution of wealth really is.
Posted by Floki
Member since Nov 2020
920 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 2:37 pm to
The Nazis want to decriminalize violence by certain individuals because they want to use them as their brown shirts to intimidate certain individuals who hold values different than their own.

I’m shooting any bastard that enters my home without permission and if they survive that I’m going to deliver a coup de grace to the skull so they can’t sue me afterwards. No matter what this crazy bitch says.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101404 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

the next clause is 100x worse

it's so bad i have to make sure this isn't fake news


I stopped reading at what I quoted. I went back and read the whole thing and thought it HAD to all be some sort of goof.

Duty to flee? Can I get my kids first?
Posted by Floki
Member since Nov 2020
920 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

If I was closer I would rob her house every night.


Your arse would be toast. “Rules for thee and not for me”
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
44849 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection and to provide the householder an incentive to cooperate. They just want to get their loot and get away. When the resident tries to resist is when people get hurt. If only one side is armed fewer people will be killed


Are you fricking kidding me? Anyone who breaks into someone else's house should be shot on sight.

ETA: I guess it's fake. The actual quote was almost just as bad though:

quote:

Meza has said that her legislation is intended to “require a homeowner to exhaust the potential of safely retreating into their habitation before using deadly force in defense of themselves or their property.”
This post was edited on 1/8/21 at 2:41 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram