- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Marketing & Advertising obsession with White Husband, Black Wife couples.
Posted on 1/26/21 at 9:25 am to SidewalkDawg
Posted on 1/26/21 at 9:25 am to SidewalkDawg
quote:
Nothing about an interracial couple bothers me or likely anyone else on the board.
It's the overrepresentation that people are curious about.
Oh, there are a couple of people it bothers, but I suspect it's a small minority. I don't see why questioning a pretty obvious overrepresentation* makes someone a racist, but whatever. That word doesn't have much meaning any more.
*I'm assuming it's true, I watch very little network TV so I have no idea
Posted on 1/26/21 at 9:27 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
Why are the gay couples almost always men? Do gay women not buy things?
Energizer Bunny much?
Posted on 1/26/21 at 9:28 am to longwayfromLA
quote:
I agree that at this point most people see an interracial couple and it won't even register in their brain to make note of it. However, clearly there is a noisy minority that gets triggered by these images or else this thread wouldn't exist.
If you see a person wearing a red shirt, you don't typically have any reason to take note of that. If you're watching TV and they suddenly have everyone wearing red shirts on everything you watch, you will probably start to take note of an odd red shirt phenomenon and wonder why that is.
Posted on 1/26/21 at 9:31 am to dclt145
My wife is mixed, in marketing, and she even thinks its dumb 
Posted on 1/26/21 at 9:32 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
If you see a person wearing a red shirt, you don't typically have any reason to take note of that. If you're watching TV and they suddenly have everyone wearing red shirts on everything you watch, you will probably start to take note of an odd red shirt phenomenon and wonder why that is.
Everyone? That's an interesting choice of word. Since in real life, it's nothing close to everyone, you're kind of telling on yourself by admitting that that's how it seems to you.
Yeah, this is really telling and sort of my point.
Posted on 1/26/21 at 9:32 am to wheelr
quote:
Not sure why the interracial couples on tv bother people so much.
As previously stated, this "situation" actually "bothers" very few people. I'm married to an Asian woman and have a half and half daughter. The point is there is clearly psychological manipulation and social engineering that is attempting to be inserted into our culture in subconcious ways on a CONSTANT basis.
I cannot let my daughter watch Netflix-produced cartoons anymore because one or more of the main characters is ALWAYS a homosexual, often a "heroic" lesbian that outperforms the male characters in acts of strength, combat, etc. It's absurd and, while I do not hate gay people, I also have no desire to let my daughter be subconsciously influenced in potentially negative ways.
Posted on 1/26/21 at 9:34 am to longwayfromLA
quote:
Everyone? That's an interesting choice of word. Since in real life, it's nothing close to everyone, you're kind of telling on yourself by admitting that that's how it seems to you.
I was clearly exaggerating. I just meant skewed from reality. I'm not one who is railing on this "phenomenon" (as should be obvious). I can still acknowledge its existence. Are you rejecting the skew?
Posted on 1/26/21 at 9:43 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I was clearly exaggerating. I just meant skewed from reality. I'm not one who is railing on this "phenomenon" (as should be obvious). I can still acknowledge its existence. Are you rejecting the skew?
I think almost everything about television and movies is skewed. I mean white dudes between the ages of 24-55 are like what 30% of the population and 80% of protagonist. But if I binge Netflix all day, by 10PM I'm not going to be like, "Oh my God, another white man." I'm probably not going to notice it.
You have to believe that are tons of people who won't particularly notice interracial couples being commercials at all.
Posted on 1/26/21 at 9:47 am to longwayfromLA
quote:
I mean white dudes between the ages of 24-55 are like what 30% of the population and 80% of protagonist. But if I binge Netflix all day, by 10PM I'm not going to be like, "Oh my God, another white man." I'm probably not going to notice it.
But, you just did.
Posted on 1/26/21 at 9:47 am to BayBengal9
quote:
The point is there is clearly psychological manipulation and social engineering that is attempting to be inserted into our culture in subconcious ways on a CONSTANT basis.
I don't disagree with that. I understand the numbers on TV may over-represent real life but I'm still struggling to figure out what's so bad about people of different races liking each other.
I believe it differs from pushing a gay or trans agenda since that negatively affects a traditional family structure. I think that is completely different than presenting an interracial mom and dad but I'm sure plenty disagree.
Posted on 1/26/21 at 9:48 am to Saint Alfonzo
quote:Are you really asking this in a thread this long?
who cares?
quote:Your brain is broken. Seriously, seek help.
Turn the tv off if it bothers you that much. It's always hilarious to watch you people go "I'm not racist but... insert fricked up shite here." These threads always go right to Klan meeting real quick.
Posted on 1/26/21 at 9:53 am to Shamoan
quote:I would think the real number by now is pretty close to that
You would think 25-30% of marriages are multiracial or homosexual.
Posted on 1/26/21 at 9:57 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
But, you just did.
Well, you literally just asked me about skewed demographics in media, so of course I thought about skewed demographics in media. That's quite a bit different than the scenario I suggested of watching a day of television and a randomly having that thought pop into mind because I'm triggered by what I'm seeing on the screen.
Posted on 1/26/21 at 10:02 am to wheelr
quote:
I understand the numbers on TV may over-represent real life but I'm still struggling to figure out what's so bad about people of different races liking each other.
Why are you struggling to understand an issue that's literally not being discussed here? Despite the fact that it's been addressed multiple times in this very thread that no one in here seems to have any issues personally with interracial marriages, it keeps being either stated or implied in response to the rather innocuous question of why it seems to be overrepresented in entertainment.
And in fact, the very specific question from the OP wasn't even general interracial couples but specifically black women and white men, which does seem even rarer than the reverse, despite you having been an example of one. Just because an issue DEAL with race, does not make one a racist for having asked it.
As Y.A. stated above, it's like suddenly realizing a ton of people are wearing the same color shirt. You have no issue with the color of shirt, but given the huge numbers of them it suddenly takes you out of whatever you're watching because it's hard not to notice all the red shirts!
Posted on 1/26/21 at 10:14 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
I would think the real number by now is pretty close to that
sure
Posted on 1/26/21 at 10:14 am to longwayfromLA
quote:
Well, you literally just asked me about skewed demographics in media, so of course I thought about skewed demographics in media. That's quite a bit different than the scenario I suggested of watching a day of television and a randomly having that thought pop into mind because I'm triggered by what I'm seeing on the screen.
You are losing and you are full of shite as usual.
Posted on 1/26/21 at 10:25 am to GeauxTigerTM
quote:
Why are you struggling to understand an issue that's literally not being discussed here?
I said I'm struggling to understand why it is even a problem if it is over-represented. I don't see the harm.
Posted on 1/26/21 at 10:46 am to gthog61
quote:
You are losing and you are full of shite as usual.
I'm sorry that the mixed couples on the tv box are triggering you so much. That really is too bad. You do have the option to just, like, not care at all, like the rest of society.
But you can't can you? What's that even about? Wife got blacked and you can't get it out of your mind, huh? It's alright she barely thinks about it.
Posted on 1/26/21 at 10:58 am to wheelr
quote:
I said I'm struggling to understand why it is even a problem if it is over-represented. I don't see the harm.
Sorry, misunderstood.
See, that's an interesting take. We hear all the time thanks to Critical Race theory that any and all issues of underrepresentation of minorities is clearly a result of racism. Like, NFL Head Coaches for instance. And since that number is not at least equal to the national average, we're told it's obviously racism (systemic or otherwise) and most be dealt with.
On the other hand, the NFL is made of up players which are roughly 70%+ black, 28%+ white and a mix in the remaining. Obviously, there is overrepresentation here, right? Now, if someone was being generous, they'd look and decide that the league is a meritocracy which just so happens to show that the best football players in the world happen to be black. Which begs the question...does CRT only pop up when a minority is UNDERREPRESENTED and not for ALL situations of racial disparities? Put another way, is it only possible for minorities to be overrepresented due to them excelling thanks to a meritocracy but never white people, who are only overrepresented due to racism? Theoretically, could the reason the NFL is 70%+ black be due to racism in favor of black players?
So, since there is this glaring issue of a double standard, I personally am attuned to issues of there being unaddressed overrepresentation now. In my mind, either we need all things to represent the national average in every field regardless of interest or ability (a quota making sure everyone is represented correctly), or we need a full on meritocracy where those good at things and interested in them can rise to the top. So long as everyone has the freedom to chose their own path and there are no obstacles preventing them from achieving, I'd prefer a meritocracy regardless of the racial makeup of any field.. I'm NOT in favor of a meritocracy only when it favors a minority and a quota system when a minority is underrepresented.
Popular
Back to top



0









