Started By
Message

re: Marine Expeditionary Unit headed to the Middle East

Posted on 3/13/26 at 10:58 am to
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
91448 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 10:58 am to
quote:

One of the more baffling decisions just from pure political strategy decisions of all time. If you want to frick with Iran, why not wait another 9 months until after mid terms. Mortgages rates were coming down, gas prices stabilized. Now you have kicked a hornets nest right before election season for no real reason. Truly shocking
Because not everyone is ok with sitting back and slowly losing everything.

ANY time is good to start rebalancing the world after the left has inorganically fricked it to hell.
This post was edited on 3/13/26 at 10:58 am
Posted by BOHICAMAN
Member since Feb 2026
1159 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Impossible, Trump said there wouldn't be boots on the ground.


When?
Posted by DaTruth7
Member since Apr 2020
4165 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 10:59 am to
Iran and Covid as a legacy. What a wasted movement.
Posted by ABearsFanNMS
Formerly of tLandmass now in Texas
Member since Oct 2014
20197 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 10:59 am to
quote:

There are no assets in place now man. They were totally unprepared for the repercussions. Helium reserves low, oil reserves low. Removed the 4 mine sweepers and decommissioned them.

Even if you think it was the right move, it was poorly planned imo


Go back to Redditt and troll there.
Posted by Masterag
'Round Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
20252 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:00 am to
quote:

Maybe they care more about Iran gaining a nuclear weapon than midterm elections






But Bibi told us they did were moments away 14 years ago. Why don't they already have one? I'm sure he wouldn't lie to us.
Posted by BOHICAMAN
Member since Feb 2026
1159 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:01 am to
quote:

There are no assets in place now man. They were totally unprepared for the repercussions. Helium reserves low, oil reserves low. Removed the 4 mine sweepers and decommissioned them. Even if you think it was the right move, it was poorly planned imo


Well, there are hundreds of warplanes and dozens of anti-aircraft defense systems moved into place. Let’s not forget the 2 aircraft carriers. This always going to be at least a month long operation, probably longer. It’s likely that this move of Marines was planned long ago.
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
10661 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:01 am to
quote:

we're fricking sick of our boys and our money being sent to the middle east to die for Israel and elite neocons who get richer from war.


Speak for yourself. I’m in support of totally destroying the Iran regime that’s been at war with America for nearly 50 years.
Posted by JiminyCricket
Member since Jun 2017
6576 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:02 am to
I don't know much about the working of how certain units of the military are utlilized so I asked chatgpt. Take it for what it's worth.......


Prompt: There are reports of the US deploying a 2,500 man marine expeditionary unit to the middle east. Does this means boots on the ground in Iran is happening or is this not as big a deal as it seems?


quote:

Short answer: No — a 2,500-Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) deploying to the Middle East does not automatically mean the U.S. is about to invade Iran. It’s significant, but it’s also a very common military posture during crises. Here’s what it likely means.

1. What a Marine Expeditionary Unit actually is

- A Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) is a rapid-response force of roughly 2,200–2,500 Marines and sailors deployed with ships, aircraft, and landing craft.

Typical capabilities include:

-Amphibious assaults (landing from ships onto shore)

-Raids or evacuations

-Seizing small objectives like ports or airfields

-Crisis response or hostage rescue

-Security for embassies or bases

They usually deploy on amphibious assault ships and operate offshore, not necessarily inside a country.

2. What the current deployment likely signals

Recent reporting says the Pentagon is sending an amphibious ready group and a Marine expeditionary unit toward the Middle East because of escalating tensions and Iranian activity in the region.

That kind of deployment usually serves several purposes:

1 Deterrence

Showing Iran that the U.S. can escalate quickly.

2 Regional protection

Protect shipping in places like the Strait of Hormuz.

Defend U.S. bases and allies.

3 Rapid reaction force

If something happens (missile strike, embassy evacuation, hostage crisis), the MEU can respond quickly.

3. Why this does NOT automatically mean an invasion of Iran

A 2,500-person MEU is far too small for an invasion of Iran.

For context:

Iraq invasion (2003): ~150,000 U.S. troops

Iran military size: ~600,000+ personnel

An MEU is designed for:

short raids

limited operations

crisis response

Not large-scale occupation or war.

4. What would signal a real ground war instead

If the U.S. were actually preparing for boots-on-the-ground combat in Iran, you’d likely see:

Multiple Army divisions mobilized

Tens of thousands of troops moving

Mass logistics buildup (fuel, armor, supply ships)

Large staging areas in Kuwait, Iraq, or Gulf states

Right now the build-up appears more focused on air, naval, and deterrence forces.

5. The one caveat

Some officials and lawmakers have warned that ground options have not been ruled out, and special-forces raids inside Iran have reportedly been discussed.

That would look more like:

small special operations missions

targeted raids

temporary landings

—not a full invasion.

? Bottom line:
A 2,500-Marine MEU heading to the Middle East is a normal crisis-response deployment, not proof that the U.S. is about to put large numbers of troops into Iran.
This post was edited on 3/13/26 at 11:05 am
Posted by msutiger
Houston
Member since Jul 2008
71995 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:02 am to
Operation Epstein Fury level 2
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130218 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:03 am to
quote:

But Bibi told us they did were moments away 14 years ago. Why don't they already have one? I'm sure he wouldn't lie to us.



The Iranians literally told us themselves that they were close to having enough enriched uranium for 11 nukes and we started this campaign within days of that.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
68333 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:03 am to
Were we lied to then or were we lied to now?
Posted by kengel2
Team Gun
Member since Mar 2004
33724 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:04 am to
Why do I feel like its a slow news day?
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41066 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:04 am to
quote:

The Iranians literally told us themselves that they were close to having enough enriched uranium for 11 nukes


Fake news
Posted by GeauxBurrow312
Member since Nov 2024
6265 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:05 am to
quote:

One of the more baffling decisions just from pure political strategy decisions of all time.


Trump is not the swamp, he’s not afraid to touch “3rd rails”, especially since it’s his final chapter
Posted by Lizardman2
Member since Jan 2024
2759 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:06 am to
We got Nimrod's remains last time. Is the expeditionary group searching for the Stargate?

Asking for a friend.
Posted by Earnest_P
Member since Aug 2021
5488 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:07 am to
I hope we have a plan to be sure they aren’t killed by drones.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130218 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Fake news



Steve Witkoff was lying?
Posted by kengel2
Team Gun
Member since Mar 2004
33724 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:10 am to
quote:

One of the more baffling decisions just from pure political strategy decisions of all time.


Just say you have no idea what a MEU is or does.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
91448 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:11 am to
quote:

President Trump: "Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images. Obliteration is an accurate term!
Can there not have been monumental damage to the facilities last year but also still a need to hit some more shite?

I’m not even entertaining the thought that we’re doing this bc of nukes.

I just do not understand your take. And I see it a lot.
Posted by BOHICAMAN
Member since Feb 2026
1159 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:11 am to
quote:

I hope we have a plan to be sure they aren’t killed by drones.


If they are in fact utilized, I suspect they’ll be used to capture and hold islands in the Strait of Hormuz in order to deny the enemy that terrain and to set up a layered air defense umbrella over the strait. Probably using helicopter borne assaults because a true amphibious landing would likely be too dangerous.

They will most likely be in danger of drone and missile attacks but the whole point would be to create a buffer zone so that civilian shipping can resume.
This post was edited on 3/13/26 at 11:12 am
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram