- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Marine Expeditionary Unit headed to the Middle East
Posted on 3/13/26 at 10:58 am to Wwarmouth
Posted on 3/13/26 at 10:58 am to Wwarmouth
quote:Because not everyone is ok with sitting back and slowly losing everything.
One of the more baffling decisions just from pure political strategy decisions of all time. If you want to frick with Iran, why not wait another 9 months until after mid terms. Mortgages rates were coming down, gas prices stabilized. Now you have kicked a hornets nest right before election season for no real reason. Truly shocking
ANY time is good to start rebalancing the world after the left has inorganically fricked it to hell.
This post was edited on 3/13/26 at 10:58 am
Posted on 3/13/26 at 10:58 am to mtb010
quote:
Impossible, Trump said there wouldn't be boots on the ground.
When?
Posted on 3/13/26 at 10:59 am to EastWestConnection
Iran and Covid as a legacy. What a wasted movement.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 10:59 am to Wwarmouth
quote:
There are no assets in place now man. They were totally unprepared for the repercussions. Helium reserves low, oil reserves low. Removed the 4 mine sweepers and decommissioned them.
Even if you think it was the right move, it was poorly planned imo
Go back to Redditt and troll there.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:00 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Maybe they care more about Iran gaining a nuclear weapon than midterm elections
But Bibi told us they did were moments away 14 years ago. Why don't they already have one? I'm sure he wouldn't lie to us.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:01 am to Wwarmouth
quote:
There are no assets in place now man. They were totally unprepared for the repercussions. Helium reserves low, oil reserves low. Removed the 4 mine sweepers and decommissioned them. Even if you think it was the right move, it was poorly planned imo
Well, there are hundreds of warplanes and dozens of anti-aircraft defense systems moved into place. Let’s not forget the 2 aircraft carriers. This always going to be at least a month long operation, probably longer. It’s likely that this move of Marines was planned long ago.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:01 am to Masterag
quote:
we're fricking sick of our boys and our money being sent to the middle east to die for Israel and elite neocons who get richer from war.
Speak for yourself. I’m in support of totally destroying the Iran regime that’s been at war with America for nearly 50 years.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:02 am to BOHICAMAN
I don't know much about the working of how certain units of the military are utlilized so I asked chatgpt. Take it for what it's worth.......
Prompt: There are reports of the US deploying a 2,500 man marine expeditionary unit to the middle east. Does this means boots on the ground in Iran is happening or is this not as big a deal as it seems?
Prompt: There are reports of the US deploying a 2,500 man marine expeditionary unit to the middle east. Does this means boots on the ground in Iran is happening or is this not as big a deal as it seems?
quote:
Short answer: No — a 2,500-Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) deploying to the Middle East does not automatically mean the U.S. is about to invade Iran. It’s significant, but it’s also a very common military posture during crises. Here’s what it likely means.
1. What a Marine Expeditionary Unit actually is
- A Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) is a rapid-response force of roughly 2,200–2,500 Marines and sailors deployed with ships, aircraft, and landing craft.
Typical capabilities include:
-Amphibious assaults (landing from ships onto shore)
-Raids or evacuations
-Seizing small objectives like ports or airfields
-Crisis response or hostage rescue
-Security for embassies or bases
They usually deploy on amphibious assault ships and operate offshore, not necessarily inside a country.
2. What the current deployment likely signals
Recent reporting says the Pentagon is sending an amphibious ready group and a Marine expeditionary unit toward the Middle East because of escalating tensions and Iranian activity in the region.
That kind of deployment usually serves several purposes:
1 Deterrence
Showing Iran that the U.S. can escalate quickly.
2 Regional protection
Protect shipping in places like the Strait of Hormuz.
Defend U.S. bases and allies.
3 Rapid reaction force
If something happens (missile strike, embassy evacuation, hostage crisis), the MEU can respond quickly.
3. Why this does NOT automatically mean an invasion of Iran
A 2,500-person MEU is far too small for an invasion of Iran.
For context:
Iraq invasion (2003): ~150,000 U.S. troops
Iran military size: ~600,000+ personnel
An MEU is designed for:
short raids
limited operations
crisis response
Not large-scale occupation or war.
4. What would signal a real ground war instead
If the U.S. were actually preparing for boots-on-the-ground combat in Iran, you’d likely see:
Multiple Army divisions mobilized
Tens of thousands of troops moving
Mass logistics buildup (fuel, armor, supply ships)
Large staging areas in Kuwait, Iraq, or Gulf states
Right now the build-up appears more focused on air, naval, and deterrence forces.
5. The one caveat
Some officials and lawmakers have warned that ground options have not been ruled out, and special-forces raids inside Iran have reportedly been discussed.
That would look more like:
small special operations missions
targeted raids
temporary landings
—not a full invasion.
? Bottom line:
A 2,500-Marine MEU heading to the Middle East is a normal crisis-response deployment, not proof that the U.S. is about to put large numbers of troops into Iran.
This post was edited on 3/13/26 at 11:05 am
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:02 am to BOHICAMAN
Operation Epstein Fury level 2
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:03 am to Masterag
quote:
But Bibi told us they did were moments away 14 years ago. Why don't they already have one? I'm sure he wouldn't lie to us.
The Iranians literally told us themselves that they were close to having enough enriched uranium for 11 nukes and we started this campaign within days of that.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:03 am to Masterag
Were we lied to then or were we lied to now?


Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:04 am to BOHICAMAN
Why do I feel like its a slow news day?
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:04 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
The Iranians literally told us themselves that they were close to having enough enriched uranium for 11 nukes
Fake news
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:05 am to Wwarmouth
quote:
One of the more baffling decisions just from pure political strategy decisions of all time.
Trump is not the swamp, he’s not afraid to touch “3rd rails”, especially since it’s his final chapter
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:06 am to BOHICAMAN
We got Nimrod's remains last time. Is the expeditionary group searching for the Stargate?
Asking for a friend.
Asking for a friend.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:07 am to BOHICAMAN
I hope we have a plan to be sure they aren’t killed by drones.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:08 am to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Fake news
Steve Witkoff was lying?
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:10 am to Wwarmouth
quote:
One of the more baffling decisions just from pure political strategy decisions of all time.
Just say you have no idea what a MEU is or does.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:11 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:Can there not have been monumental damage to the facilities last year but also still a need to hit some more shite?
President Trump: "Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images. Obliteration is an accurate term!
I’m not even entertaining the thought that we’re doing this bc of nukes.
I just do not understand your take. And I see it a lot.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 11:11 am to Earnest_P
quote:
I hope we have a plan to be sure they aren’t killed by drones.
If they are in fact utilized, I suspect they’ll be used to capture and hold islands in the Strait of Hormuz in order to deny the enemy that terrain and to set up a layered air defense umbrella over the strait. Probably using helicopter borne assaults because a true amphibious landing would likely be too dangerous.
They will most likely be in danger of drone and missile attacks but the whole point would be to create a buffer zone so that civilian shipping can resume.
This post was edited on 3/13/26 at 11:12 am
Popular
Back to top



0






