Started By
Message

re: Maricopa County calmly and surgically refutes key voter fraud claim

Posted on 7/15/21 at 9:52 pm to
Posted by DesScorp
Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
6557 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 9:52 pm to
Eat shite and Die.
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 9:54 pm to
You’re an enemy. Anyone peddling the sham of 2020 is an enemy of America. Welcome to reality. Go raise a fist and burn down a Popeyes. You’re on their side, now.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53493 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 9:54 pm to
My favorite part of his title:

quote:

Maricopa County calmly and surgically refutes



Thank God they are not actual surgeons! The hack job they would do!
Posted by DownHome
Below the Equator
Member since Jan 2012
10211 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 9:57 pm to
What a fricking loser. You try so hard and yet fail every time.

Don't ever change and just keep being you.

fricking unreal
Posted by GregMaddux
LSU Fan
Member since Jun 2011
18216 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

HailHailtoMichigan!



You’ve shown your hand far too many times.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46248 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

CLAIM: Maricopa County received 74,000 more mail-in ballots than we sent.

FACTS: In Maricopa County, we allow people to vote early in two ways: 1) by mail and 2) in-person at Vote Centers. These are all considered early votes.

The people who vote in-person use ballots provided at a Vote Center. This is not a new practice, so it's not unusual that we would have more early votes than mail-in ballots sent.

In addition, the EV32 Returns & EV33 files are not the proper files to refer to for a complete accumulating of all early ballots sent and received.

CLAIM: There was potential over-voting due to ink bleeding through ballots.

FACTS: If bleed through happens, it does not cause an over-vote. Elex officials program certified tabulation equipment & design ballots w/ offset columns to ensure these ballots are counted accurately.

This accuracy is verified through logic and accuracy tests, hand counts performed by the political parties, and post-election audits performed by EAC certified voting testing laboratories. #SharpieGate has been debunked already.



This ^^^ statement is as clear as mud.. lol! I’m going to get real crazy with this OP and just call BS right now!
Posted by Herooftheday
Member since Feb 2021
3830 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

CLAIM: There was potential over-voting due to ink bleeding through ballots.

FACTS: If bleed through happens, it does not cause an over-vote. Elex officials program certified tabulation equipment & design ballots w/ offset columns to ensure these ballots are counted accurately.

This accuracy is verified through logic and accuracy tests, hand counts performed by the political parties, and post-election audits performed by EAC certified voting testing laboratories. #SharpieGate has been debunked already.


This would be true if the ballots were in half arse alignment. If you watch the hearing these ballot alignment marks were all over the place.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51786 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

CLAIM: Maricopa County received 74,000 more mail-in ballots than we sent.

FACTS: In Maricopa County, we allow people to vote early in two ways: 1) by mail and 2) in-person at Vote Centers. These are all considered early votes.

The people who vote in-person use ballots provided at a Vote Center. This is not a new practice, so it's not unusual that we would have more early votes than mail-in ballots sent.

In addition, the EV32 Returns & EV33 files are not the proper files to refer to for a complete accumulating of all early ballots sent and received.


You realize this doesn't answer the CLAIM, right? Like... not at all.

To prove my point, show me in their response where it says they did not receive more mail-in ballots than they sent. They don't. What they say is that "it's not unusual that we would have more early votes than mail-in ballots."

And they said "the EV32 Returns & EV33 files are not the proper files to refer to for a complete accumulating of all early ballots sent and received."

Again, they aren't saying that the claim is incorrect they are saying only that those two files are not the proper files for determining this then letting the reader infer the rest. They also do not mention what file or files would provide a complete accounting (nor what their numbers are).

quote:

But this very logical and sensible refutation by Maricopa county put the issue to bed.


You're buying a simple dodge and you don't even see it.


Posted by Captain Rumbeard
Member since Jan 2014
4173 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 10:09 pm to
Cool story but we're going to need to see the receipts. If they exist, you could have communicated this to the auditors like normal human beings with nothing to hide instead of stonewalling them like criminals in a cover up.
Posted by Herooftheday
Member since Feb 2021
3830 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 10:15 pm to
Why is Maricopas strategy to come back with responses to the hearings instead of working with them. Why not tell them "the proper files to refer to for a complete accumulating of all early ballots sent and received." Explain why they are this way.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111580 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 10:18 pm to
Your schtick is played out. No one should even take this trolling as serious.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
18711 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

But this very logical and sensible refutation by Maricopa county put the issue to bed.



I can see where you would certainly hope for this to be true. Funny how none of this has ever been an issue before now. All of the sudden Joe "More vote than Obama" Biden needs excuses thrown out left and right to explain his magical come back.

It is over and the sooner you progress through the 7 stages the better it will be for you.
Posted by DTRooster
Belle River, La
Member since Dec 2013
7962 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 10:24 pm to
quote:

unreal.
No. The prog filth dripping on you is in fact real. Can’t you feel it?
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36765 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 10:27 pm to
quote:

unreal.

A poster who has been posting conservative thoughts since 2012 is now labeled "filth" because he is offering a different viewpoint to the voter fraud argument.


I've seen what makes them cheer. Be proud of the boos.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111580 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 10:29 pm to
I love the liberals validating HHTM.

So conservative.
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36765 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 10:30 pm to
quote:

You realize this doesn't answer the CLAIM, right? Like... not at all.

To prove my point, show me in their response where it says they did not receive more mail-in ballots than they sent. They don't. What they say is that "it's not unusual that we would have more early votes than mail-in ballots."

And they said "the EV32 Returns & EV33 files are not the proper files to refer to for a complete accumulating of all early ballots sent and received."

Again, they aren't saying that the claim is incorrect they are saying only that those two files are not the proper files for determining this then letting the reader infer the rest. They also do not mention what file or files would provide a complete accounting (nor what their numbers are).


So how did they arrive at the tabulation that more mail in votes were recurved than sent. What is the source data for that?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111580 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 10:31 pm to
It’s in the report.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68402 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 10:33 pm to
Did the entirety of the report get released? Or, are these just preliminary bits and pieces.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41722 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

Did the entirety of the report get released? Or, are these just preliminary bits and pieces.
Full report is not complete. Maricopa is still stonewalling on certain aspects.

Partial revelation of issues were provided during the update today.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53493 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

So how did they arrive at the tabulation that more mail in votes


From the data the Maricopa Co BOS sent.

As 808 said.. it's in the report
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram