- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 7/15/21 at 11:32 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
CUCK
U
C
K
U
C
K
Posted on 7/15/21 at 11:52 pm to SportTiger1
quote:
Is the issue their ability to read the vote OR the fact that it could be duplicated ballots?
Or that the ballot was printed on paper not allowed by statute?
Posted on 7/16/21 at 12:05 am to texridder
quote:
The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed all of the correspondence between Fann and the auditors and all of the internal documents of the auditors. Fann and the auditors fought the subpoena. Why would they do that if they didn't have anything to hide (doesn't that sound familiar)?
The power to establish, implement and enforce election laws rests with the state- and the state can tell the federal government to kiss their arse and gtfo.
However in this case, i think the state should just respond to the oversight committee that unfortunately, all of the requested records were on a bathroom server at Fanns house that was accidentally wiped clean.
Posted on 7/16/21 at 12:06 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
real election savvy company.
quote:
So cheating Democrat’s?
It must such to be so ignorant that that same old useless crap is all you can post.
Posted on 7/16/21 at 12:08 am to texridder
quote:
It must such to be so ignorant that that same old useless crap is all you can post.
So who was it? And tell us about their experience auditing statewide elections -
Posted on 7/16/21 at 12:08 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
CLAIM: Maricopa County received 74,000 more mail-in ballots than we sent.
I have no idea, if this is true or not. But their fact checking doesn’t even address it. The compare the early vote to the mail-in vote. But the claim they are arguing against only addresses mail-in votes.
Posted on 7/16/21 at 12:08 am to texridder
quote:
It must such to be so ignorant that that same old useless crap is all you can post.
Since you’re intent on believing that Fann et al all have something to hide, why hasn’t Maricopa released the routers yet? Do they have something to hide?
Posted on 7/16/21 at 12:15 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
Because it truly is NONE of their fricking business. Your ignorance is astounding.
Why don't you explain how it is none of their business.
This was a federal election and the dumbasses in Arizona turned the ballots and election equipment over to a private incompetent 3rd party.
I remember all you hayseeds screaming about how all ballots in federal elections have to be retained for 22 months after the election.
That doesn't count anymore?
Posted on 7/16/21 at 12:16 am to CDawson
quote:
Or that the ballot was printed on paper not allowed by statute
It's really as simple as that. The problem with the ballot doesn't matter.
Wrong paper, illegitimate
Posted on 7/16/21 at 12:19 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Since you’re intent on believing that Fann et al all have something to hide, why hasn’t Maricopa released the routers yet? Do they have something to hide?
I don't know. They might. Their explanation as to why they wouldn't turn them over was pretty convoluted.
Posted on 7/16/21 at 12:41 am to texridder
quote:
Why don't you explain how it is none of their business.
Because the Constitution of the United State of America was ratified by the states and part of that agreement is that the STATE LEGISLATURE has control of their election process, not the US Congress.
quote:
This was a federal election
Ran and controlled by the State Legislature. We do not have a federalized election system.
quote:
Arizona turned the ballots and election equipment over to a private incompetent 3rd party.
No. They turned it over to the proper authority. The Senate.
quote:
I remember all you hayseeds screaming about how all ballots in federal elections have to be retained for 22 months after the election.
That's correct. The reason for it being held for 22 months is for the protection of election integrity. Specifically in this case, the governing body ordered a forensic audit.
They took applications and hired contractors who actually have gov background work in their fields.
The person the Senate appointed over the Forensic Audit is a former Sec of State who runs the election process for the State Legislature.
Any more questions?
Posted on 7/16/21 at 12:48 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Lol, Twitter?
Yeah, gfy
Yeah, gfy
Posted on 7/16/21 at 1:17 am to David_DJS
quote:
So who was it? And tell us about their experience auditing statewide elections -
Clear Ballot Group.
They have a mail in voting software administration system that is EAC certified and used in 8 states. In their bid to the Arizona Senate they represented that the firm has conducted more than 200 audits over 13 years in business.
Posted on 7/16/21 at 1:45 am to Jjdoc
quote:
Arizona turned the ballots and election equipment over to a private incompetent 3rd party.
quote:
No. They turned it over to the proper authority. The Senate.
Don't be an arse. The Senate then turned them over to a 3rd party.
quote:
The person the Senate appointed over the Forensic Audit is a former Sec of State who runs the election process for the State Legislature.
Don't be a jackass. Ken Bennett, the former AZ Sec of State is serving as the Arizona Senate's liaison for the Maricopa County election audit. The liaison, jackass. Logan runs the audit process.
quote:
They took applications and hired contractors who actually have gov background work in their fields.
More horseshite. Logan hired the contractors that have been working on the audit.
Posted on 7/16/21 at 1:50 am to texridder
quote:
In their bid to the Arizona Senate they represented that the firm has conducted more than 200 audits over 13 years in business.
I think we’re talking about different kinds of audits. They have experience doing audits where the accuracy of counts tabulated by machines is being questioned. But the Arizona audit has a completely different remit. I don’t think the Clear Ballot Group has any experience investigating fraudulent registrations, fraudulent votes, or fraudulent vote counting/reporting.
Posted on 7/16/21 at 3:14 am to the808bass
quote:
Shut up, queer on the dole.
Why don't you post some more of your stupid shite- like the ignorance you posted on here about the Wayne County mail-in votes?
Step up, chickenshit.
Posted on 7/16/21 at 3:35 am to the808bass
I agree on texridder but we all need to let threads like this dis on TD and not have its’ headline close to top of our poliboard
That’s what our enemy wants is to have negatives on Maricopa headlines and read
Let this thread die and don’t respond to it
That’s what our enemy wants is to have negatives on Maricopa headlines and read
Let this thread die and don’t respond to it
Posted on 7/16/21 at 4:43 am to texridder
quote:
texridder
You sleep with a Biden body pillow don't you?
Posted on 7/16/21 at 5:02 am to Jack Carter
quote:
hum2
@hummingbird_206
Replying to
@maricopacounty
Thank you for getting the correct information out to us. It's pretty sad that fact checking has become a full time job.
Bias is so easy to spot
The problem is we all have it.
We just want the truth to be evident and indisputable.
Page 6 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News