Started By
Message

re: Lower and Middle Class America has declined over the past 50 years

Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:18 am to
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28131 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:18 am to
quote:

But, I agree with bringing manufacturing back.


Which manufacturing? What's the criteria for deciding whether we want to make TVs or shoes or fishing reels?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476634 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:18 am to
quote:

Simply inaccurate.

How?
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63314 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:19 am to
quote:

How is frying fries in vegetable oil more skilled than manufacturing computer chips?
Isn't how workers are valued. A person that builds buggy whips is very skilled. A person that can build wooden wagon wheels-- supremely skilled. But if we went back to using wooden wheels for vehicles, we would not have a good economy. Even though the workers would "more skilled". The value is what you create.

quote:

Overpaid according to whom?
You can choose two pairs of shoes. Exaclty the same. One costs $200. The other costs $5. Which one is overpriced?
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28131 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:20 am to
quote:

The people arguing for cheap imports


Are you arguing for expensive imports?
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
41311 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:21 am to
quote:

Currently a job at McDonalds is higher-paced, more skilled, and more economically productive than these jobs you want back (without governmetn intervention and redistribution of wealth).


Nope. Just because you make up stuff doesn’t mean it’s true.

If an entire chip manufacturing plant came back a McDonald’s worker would not be more skilled than most people working there.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
68365 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:21 am to
But, what if that job that comes back is just going to be minimum wage, anyway?
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
28105 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:22 am to
quote:

Currently a job at McDonalds is higher-paced, more skilled, and more economically productive than these jobs you want back (without governmetn intervention and redistribution of wealth). Why do they deserve double/triple the salary of a McDonalds worker (+ benefits and retirement, if we're going fully halcyon)?


Not sure how you quantify higher-paced or what TF it matters to this discussion, but they're certainly not more skilled and the economically productive bit is hysterical.

The most profitable part of fast food, by far, are the beverages. Going off your metric pouring liquid in a God damn cup is extremely skilled and economically productive. How could we ever do without the experts that pour liquid into cups!?!?
This post was edited on 4/3/25 at 8:23 am
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63314 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:22 am to
quote:

Today the poor have the ability to afford the same luxury goods that the rich do.
It's incredibly provencial to aruge that Americans are poor, while arguing that our workers aren't overpaid.

By international standards there are no poor people in amerca. And they are the most expensive labor on the planet.
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
19829 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:22 am to
1995 - WTO

2000 - MFT, China
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
41311 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:23 am to
quote:

You can choose two pairs of shoes. Exaclty the same. One costs $200. The other costs $5. Which one is overpriced?


What shoe is made overseas and costs $5 dollars. Nikes cost over $200 and are made by slaves
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
79933 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:23 am to
quote:

What's the criteria for deciding whether we want to make TVs or shoes or fishing reels?
Why must there be criteria or a decision? Won't the corporations choose their next steps?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476634 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:23 am to
quote:

Higher earners would pay less taxes only if their salaries dropped.

Exactly. This policy is aimed at hurting their sectors and causing job loss and salary decreases (to fund the unproductive and inefficient lower-level manufacturing jobs).

That's the trade off in the policy.

quote:

How does bringing manufacturing back necessarily cause other industries to be paid less?

Increasing the cost of goods means less money circulating in those areas of the economy. Hence, the redistribution behind this policy.

The lower prices we pay for goods in our more natural economy means we have more money to spend on other things. The higher prices caused by this tariff-redistribution policy takes spending from these sectors of the economy, which will hurt those working in these productive sectors.

quote:

A smaller piece of a bigger pie might be more pie than a bigger piece of a smaller pie.

It's the same pie, at first. You're using government to determine where money spending is distributed.

The pie will likely become smaller with the tariff-redistribution policy, also, as the specific focus is to redistribute money to less economically productive and efficient sectors.

quote:

Hardly. If you make more you receive less benefits.

You're assuming the welfare class will take these jobs when jobs are available for them currently that they refuse.

quote:

Some government regs are necessary.

Thanks Rex.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476634 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:25 am to
quote:

Nope. Just because you make up stuff doesn’t mean it’s true.

I didn't "make up stuff"

McDonalds jobs exist, for economic reasons.

These lower-level manufacturing jobs do not, for economic reasons.

quote:

If an entire chip manufacturing plant




Posted by wallowinit
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2006
17705 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:25 am to
quote:

Currently a job at McDonalds is higher-paced, more skilled, and more economically productive than these jobs you want back (without governmetn intervention and redistribution of wealth). Why do they deserve double/triple the salary of a McDonalds worker (+ benefits and retirement, if we're going fully halcyon)?


Wow. That’s pure communism mentality.
How about let’s simply level the playing field and see how it works out. That would be the most fair for everybody and give everyone a chance to succeed without the government choosing winners and losers.
Posted by LSUSUPERSTAR
TX
Member since Jan 2005
16999 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:26 am to
quote:

Currently a job at McDonalds is higher-paced, more skilled, and more economically productive than these jobs you want back (without governmetn intervention and redistribution of wealth).


This tells me you've never worked at McDonald's or a manufacturing site. Both of which I've done over the course of my working life.

Stick to getting people out of DWIs.
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
41311 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:26 am to
quote:

I didn't "make up stuff" McDonalds jobs exist, for economic reasons.


Working at McDonald’s is easier and lower level than any manufacturing job foreign or domestic.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476634 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:26 am to
quote:

but they're certainly not more skilled and the economically productive

Then why do they exist and lower-level manufacturing jobs do not?

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476634 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:27 am to
quote:

and are made by slaves


Here we go, Another pivot to emotional arguments due to losing the argument
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
41311 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:27 am to
quote:

and lower-level manufacturing jobs do not?


Lower level manufacturing jobs do exist in the US.

Your argument is that they don’t?
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63314 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:27 am to
quote:

Prices can and will go up. The question is are these price increases off set by other boons.
same thing they say about minimum wage increases

quote:

Bringing these jobs back increases tax revenues, keeps those dollars circulating in our own economy and lowers reliance on social welfare programs.
Why couldn't we just pay half the country to dig holes, the other half to fill them up, tax both of them at 50% and they'll pay for each other!
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 18
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 18Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram