- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Looks like a plane hit a Helicopter at DCA airport
Posted on 1/30/25 at 6:30 am to Penrod
Posted on 1/30/25 at 6:30 am to Penrod
quote:
and a little blame on the airline pilots for not seeing the helicopter (I’s sympathize with them, though, because when on a glideslope your going through checklists).
And it's night time.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 6:35 am to Penrod
quote:
More likely is a mistake by the helicopter pilots, and a little blame on the airline pilots for not seeing the helicopter
It might very well be the CRJ pilots did not have line of sight.
Maybe this will help.
Current transcript of the PSA 5342 crash:
Blue Streak 5342 is the CRJ. Pat 25 is the helicopter.
4 mins prior to crash: "Tower, Blue Streak 5342 on Mount Vernon Visual Runway 1"
"Blue Streak 5342, Washington Tower, winds are 320/17G25 can you take Runway 33?"
30 sec pause
"Yeah we can do Runway 33 for Bluestreak 5342"
"Bluestreak 5342 (unclear) bridge make the turn for 33, cleared to land 33"
"Change to Runway 33, cleared to land 33 bluestreak 5342"
Other traffic being handled to Runway 1.
Approx 2.5 mins to crash:
Pat25: "PAT25 memorial."
Tower: Pat25 rodger.
Approx 1:20 till crash:
Tower: "PAT25 traffic just south of (unclear) bridge is a CRJ at 1,200ft turning for Runway 33"
PAT25: PAT25 has the Traffic in sight, request visual separation
Tower: Visual separation approved.
Tower: "American 1631 winds are (unclear) no delay, traffic on 3 mile final for Runway 33 cleared for immediate takeoff"
"Cleared for takeoff, AA1631"
Approximately 10 seconds prior to collision
Tower: "PAT25 do you have the CRJ in sight?"
Tower: "PAT25 (unclear maybe pass behind) CRJ"
Pat25: Affirm. Pat 25 has traffic in sight request visual separation.
Tower: Separation.
15 seconds later
"Tower, AA472 (unclear)"
"American 472 washington tower" alarms going off "Oooh!" "Oh my god!" *click
15 seconds later
"Tower, did you see that?"
Tower frantically begins commanding go arounds and deconfliction.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 6:38 am to Penrod
It looked like it came from back right/left. More from the side but still at an angle Im not sure the pilots could have seen.
This post was edited on 1/30/25 at 6:38 am
Posted on 1/30/25 at 6:40 am to Marye
Commercial pilot friend thinks help too high - supposed to tip at 200 ft but was at 300 ft - says that airport is crazy bad at night
Posted on 1/30/25 at 6:41 am to Penrod
quote:
Yeah, it’s possible ATC is responsible, but even in that case, both sets of pilots are at fault, because they were in VMC (not in clouds), and regardless of the fight rules, pilots in VMC are responsible for maintaining separation from other aircraft.
In this case,however, the lion’s share of the blame would be on the controllers. This is the least likely scenario, though. More likely is a mistake by the helicopter pilots, and a little blame on the airline pilots for not seeing the helicopter (I’s sympathize with them, though, because when on a glideslope your going through checklists).
Excellent post here. Checklists hold a lot of attention in the cockpit of aircraft. I could see the pilots being hard at work on them, as it is likely routine to rely on ATC and on-aircraft systems for collision avoidance information.
That said, collision avoidance systems usually aren’t mutable in the cockpit like general system cautions and advisories are. Warnings (meaning certain system failures or potential accident conditions exist) are designed to sound and present regardless of the time or mode of flight.
Something is off about the collision avoidance aspect here, if you ask me… I feel like there has to be procedure guiding what ATC does in the event of a collision avoidance indicator, but that may be local policy with military aircraft to talk the helicopters through the traffic.
Either that or the collision avoidance system was not working for EITHER aircraft. There are lots of questions to be answered.
The other thing at play is that the helicopter pilot requested he be allowed to maintain visual separation from the airplane approaching… yet obviously still collided with it, and apparently at speed unless the videos aren’t at good angles to reflect true air speed.
So did the pilot really not see the aircraft? Looking at the fight/approach radars, those were the only two aircraft in that area.
Active runways go in the same direction for takeoff and landing. It is based on wind direction. So the plane taking off in the video is flying AWAY from the aircraft that collided. What other plane could the helicopter pilot have been talking about keeping visual separation from?
Black boxes will tell the true tale, but I think lots of policy and procedure is about to be rewritten nationwide.
Possibilities in my mind in no particular order:
1). Helicopter pilot committed suicide not caring his buddies were with him.
2). Helicopter was lower in altitude than the airplane and trying to gain altitude. Pilot misjudged his ascent and had no vertical visibility, thinking he was fine.
That’s not even talking about ATC actions/communications. In that case, it sounds like there was poor or inefficient communication going on. No sense of urgency and everyone treating it as a routine situation even as the collision became imminent.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 6:48 am to Marye
quote:
Pat25: Affirm. Pat 25 has traffic in sight request visual separation.
Tower: Separation.
At this point, it seems this is all on the helicopter pilot. See and avoid
Posted on 1/30/25 at 7:18 am to UncleFestersLegs
Posted on 1/30/25 at 7:21 am to UncleFestersLegs
Posted on 1/30/25 at 7:24 am to cajunangelle
this is terrible. disgusting tragedy. totally avoidable. people have enough to worry about when flying especially if there is a plane or pilot failure or a terrorist
now we cannot even get a dipshit chopper pilot away from a busy airport and out the ascend/descend approach lane? WTF?
how stupid are these people?
now we cannot even get a dipshit chopper pilot away from a busy airport and out the ascend/descend approach lane? WTF?
how stupid are these people?
Posted on 1/30/25 at 7:26 am to UncleFestersLegs
Helicopter pilot blew it. They saw the jet so why the hell keep moving straight into it. I keep getting this DEI feeling but who knows.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 7:27 am to cajunangelle
Maybe Tuscaloosa or one of our other pilots can answer something. If you’re flying the jet and on the glide path at about 300 ft and all the sudden you see a helo coming at you, is evasive action even realistic at that point?
Just heard a former Apache pilot on Fox and he said being VFR at night in that environment is very difficult. Said he had a near miss with a jumbo in Korea.
Just heard a former Apache pilot on Fox and he said being VFR at night in that environment is very difficult. Said he had a near miss with a jumbo in Korea.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 7:30 am to wareaglepete
Well, that sounds legit. Stuff happens I guess.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 7:33 am to Fat Bastard
I just had to go on a trip for work this week and had multiple layovers. My biggest concern was a damn drone hitting the plane and I’d have never ever thought about the possibility of a damn MILITARY helicopter hitting my plane. Especially in DC where everything is so much more strict.
Massive failure on that helicopter pilot’s part I imagine. Who would have thought?
Massive failure on that helicopter pilot’s part I imagine. Who would have thought?
Posted on 1/30/25 at 7:34 am to RCDfan1950
how about keep all choppers on a perimeter around airports at a certain elevation so going around a airport will automatically keep all planes above him. the dude flew right in front of the runway and he was close at same elevation. unacceptable.
epic failure also for whoever allowed this chopper flight.
epic failure also for whoever allowed this chopper flight.
This post was edited on 1/30/25 at 7:38 am
Posted on 1/30/25 at 7:34 am to RCDfan1950
quote:the only thing that makes sense is they had a visual on a different aircraft and never saw the one they hit.
Helicopter pilot blew it. They saw the jet so why the hell keep moving straight into it
Another thing I've read is that there were only 3 crew members instead of 4. So one less crew chief. Not sure if this is normal especially at night in that class airspace
Posted on 1/30/25 at 7:37 am to wareaglepete
quote:the heli pilot mentioned visual separation so I'm assuming he was using night vision and saw AN aircraft.
Just heard a former Apache pilot on Fox and he said being VFR at night in that environment is very difficult.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 7:37 am to dafif
The really sad part of the story is that if there were 2 pilots on the helicopter then their families will get denied basically everything including life insurance. If the report shows them being 100 ft too high which puts them at fault.
I know this because one of my friends was killed due to pilot error on a deployment and the families of the pilots were exempt from the beneficiary list. My friend's wife told me that because all the families were in a Facebook group.
I know this because one of my friends was killed due to pilot error on a deployment and the families of the pilots were exempt from the beneficiary list. My friend's wife told me that because all the families were in a Facebook group.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 7:38 am to Fat Bastard
You'll probably get downvoted because: "you're not a pilot, you don't know how this all works." Or something like that.
I'm not one either, and know shite about aviation, or even pretend to. What I do know is there should be multiple, redundant ways to avoid a goddamn Blackhawk from flying into the path of a descending airliner.
I'm not one either, and know shite about aviation, or even pretend to. What I do know is there should be multiple, redundant ways to avoid a goddamn Blackhawk from flying into the path of a descending airliner.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 7:39 am to BluegrassCardinal
quote:
You'll probably get downvoted because: "you're not a pilot, you don't know how this all works." Or something like that.
quote:
I'm not one either, and know shite about aviation, or even pretend to. What I do know is there should be multiple, redundant ways to avoid a goddamn Blackhawk from flying into the path of a descending airliner.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 7:42 am to USAFTiger42
Sorry if already posted but I'm seeing reports (multiple youtube news videos) that there are zero survivors. This just sucks.
Popular
Back to top


0








