9
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Literally activists disguised as jurors
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:07 am
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:07 am
@EndWokeness
·
Follow
Lindsay Clancy juror Paula Devlin:
"We thought, this is a real opportunity to get people talking. That's all we really thought." [Giggles]
Nothing about justice for the 3 children
Replying to @EndWokeness
So during deliberations, they were already planning their media tour. These women weren’t seeking justice, they were looking to make a statement and seek out fame.
·
Follow
Lindsay Clancy juror Paula Devlin:
"We thought, this is a real opportunity to get people talking. That's all we really thought." [Giggles]
Nothing about justice for the 3 children
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Replying to @EndWokeness
So during deliberations, they were already planning their media tour. These women weren’t seeking justice, they were looking to make a statement and seek out fame.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:12 am to Jbird
Don't know the specifics of MA law, but ffs, the prosecutors need to do their homework and strike down these clowns and not allow them anywhere near the juror's box.
I suppose a case could be made that no one would reasonably expect that on THIS case, there'd be a wave of activists posing as jurors, but it's becoming crystal clear that the Left have become more and more unhinged.
The sanity of society dictates that normal people be more aware and observant. We can no longer simply assume that the other side thinks the same way or wants the same things as the rest of us.
I suppose a case could be made that no one would reasonably expect that on THIS case, there'd be a wave of activists posing as jurors, but it's becoming crystal clear that the Left have become more and more unhinged.
The sanity of society dictates that normal people be more aware and observant. We can no longer simply assume that the other side thinks the same way or wants the same things as the rest of us.
This post was edited on 9/18/26 at 7:13 am
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:14 am to Jbird
People need to start calling this mindset for what it is.
Evil.
Don’t let the commies and feminists take control of your emotions. Their intentions are not just. They are vindictive counts* that want to upend all things that work, so when everything is crashing and burning - communism becomes the seemingly inevitable choice.
Evil.
Don’t let the commies and feminists take control of your emotions. Their intentions are not just. They are vindictive counts* that want to upend all things that work, so when everything is crashing and burning - communism becomes the seemingly inevitable choice.
This post was edited on 9/18/26 at 7:16 am
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:20 am to Jbird
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:22 am to SouthEasternKaiju
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:23 am to Jbird
Wine soaked crazy cat ladies are just the worst. Killing the country.
They shouldn’t be able to vote.
They shouldn’t be able to vote.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:23 am to cajunangelle
Sounds like a bunch of cubbies
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:26 am to Pedropatterstine
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:31 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
prosecutors need to do their homework
That's the real issue. Unfortunately, they don't have the time during voir dire to hunt down someone's social media and see what the history of their posted stances show.
That said, there should be some sort of severe penalty for admitting bias to this degree (pretty much admitting they went in with the subjective mindset of proving her not guilty by reason of insanity so they could create postpartum issues as a reason for allowing women to murder their kids).
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:32 am to Jbird
I need to see the rest of this interview if I’m going to agree with the X post that they decided this mid-trial. All she mentions is walking out of the courthouse. This timing is a very important distinction.
This whole case is messed up and MA law needs to be revised. These jurors may have had motives beyond performing their civic duty. I’d like to think I wouldn’t be going on a media campaign afterward.
I’m curious about all the jurors taking advantage of their fifteen minutes of fame. I just don’t think this clip is the smoking gun on its own.
This whole case is messed up and MA law needs to be revised. These jurors may have had motives beyond performing their civic duty. I’d like to think I wouldn’t be going on a media campaign afterward.
I’m curious about all the jurors taking advantage of their fifteen minutes of fame. I just don’t think this clip is the smoking gun on its own.
quote:Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:37 am to Jbird
Wonder who’s paying her to get in front of all the cameras
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:39 am to Bard
quote:
That's the real issue. Unfortunately, they don't have the time during voir dire to hunt down someone's social media and see what the history of their posted stances show.
It's not like they're working alone, they have a team. Put a freaking aid on it.
This post was edited on 9/18/26 at 7:40 am
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:50 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Full Term? Next you'll be defending killing Toddlers
We have our prophets who warned us about the slippery slope of abortion. On February 3, 1994 Nobel winning Saint Theresa of Calcutta addressed the attendees at the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, D.C. With pro-choice President Bill Clinton and FLOTUS Hillary looking on she didn't mince her words when she said......
How do you expect people to respect each other on the streets, when you don't even respect the baby in the womb?
It went downhill from there. The abortion crowd has moved on to Infanticide.
67million aborted babies........and counting.
Do we need a separate category for infanticide?
This post was edited on 9/18/26 at 8:03 am
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:54 am to Bard
quote:They do, actually. The pool of potential jurors is known in advance of the start of juror seating interviews. What the prosecution has is time, but they don't have the money to hire the investigators to background check the pool. Seems like this is a real opportunity for someone to create an AI agent to sniff through people's social media posts and lifestyle and apply some intelligence towards juror nullification challenges.
That's the real issue. Unfortunately, they don't have the time during voir dire to hunt down someone's social media and see what the history of their posted stances show.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:57 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
Seems like this is a real opportunity for someone to create an AI agent to sniff through people's social media posts and lifestyle and apply some intelligence towards juror nullification challenges.
This does exist in forms and will happen, but it's not going to be 1-sided
In a state like MA, it's more likely to be used to remove the people this board would want on the jury
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:04 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Agreed, but, again, publicly funded prosecution is always fighting against well funded defense teams and idealist willing to '"fight for a cause."
This does exist in forms and will happen, but it's not going to be 1-sided
In a state like MA, it's more likely to be used to remove the people this board would want on the jury
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:10 am to Jbird
Perhaps that is why the lone holdout was so steadfast in his stance - deny them that piece of idiocy.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:16 am to SouthEasternKaiju
Almost feels this jury was rigged from the selection process. No way a good prosecutor misses that many activists without being in on it
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:34 am to OU Guy
I know they only have so many strikes, but damn. These seemed like the worst of the worst.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:40 am to Jbird
A jury of your peers. If your peers are activists, then they will be on the jury. It’s up to the defense to try to weed some of them out during jury selection.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News