- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Likelihood that Covid was created for population control?
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:14 am
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:14 am
Create a illness that primarily takes out the elderly and ppl with serious health issues. Create a cure that is pushed at everyone to prevent it but actually takes out a certain % of the healthy also. While at that same time creating faux supply chain issues and a false belief of food shortages that create price spikes that crash the economy. How long before the entire world economy crashes and the answer from the global elite will be the One world government?
38
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:15 am to Ponchy Tiger
if so, they did a shitty job
99% + survival rate...
99% + survival rate...
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:15 am to Ponchy Tiger
Seems pretty plausible to me.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:16 am to Ponchy Tiger
Chinese created it. We've heard about their problems with population for decades.
Rich elite benefited most from it. We've heard about their obsession with eugenics for decades.
I don't think it's much of a stretch to think it was for population control.
Rich elite benefited most from it. We've heard about their obsession with eugenics for decades.
I don't think it's much of a stretch to think it was for population control.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:20 am to Ponchy Tiger
People don’t want to think that certain rich fuks/influencers can be evil like that.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:22 am to Ponchy Tiger
It may not have been designed so much for population control as for control of the population.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:23 am to Ponchy Tiger
50-50. Secular Humanist (no God/no Soul/no respect) Ideology has zero respect for Humans which they deem to be 'flawed' or who don't respect *authority* from Elitist rule. It's Orwell's "Animal Farm" IRL.
"Can two walk together lest they be agreed"? No. Can hundreds of BILLIONS? Hell no! Agreement is an absolute necessity. Freedom is a/the most wonderful thing...but everybody can't handle it. So...
"Can two walk together lest they be agreed"? No. Can hundreds of BILLIONS? Hell no! Agreement is an absolute necessity. Freedom is a/the most wonderful thing...but everybody can't handle it. So...
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:23 am to dcbl
quote:
if so, they did a shitty job
99% + survival rate..
They wasn't finished with it before it escaped the lab.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:24 am to Ponchy Tiger
Ive said this before, but COVID was waaaaayyyy too convenient for China and American Democrats.
First point: China's economy during the Trump years was on the brink of collapse, largely due to Trump's trade policies.
Second point: Democrats, after several unsuccessful attempts to remove Trump, were running a laughing stock candidate and had little chance of winning anything in 2020.
Third point: Population control must start with the elderly, especially those of poor health who are the biggest strain on the social safety net and healthcare systems.
Fourth point: Democrats needed a mechanism to mobilize their lazy arse base permanently as well as shield long suspected vote harvesting schemes. as well as stifle voter ID laws gaining traction across the country.
Fifth point: China was uniquely in position to profit off of PPE sales, test kits, and other medical products stockpiled by governments all over the world for COVID preparedness.
First point: China's economy during the Trump years was on the brink of collapse, largely due to Trump's trade policies.
Second point: Democrats, after several unsuccessful attempts to remove Trump, were running a laughing stock candidate and had little chance of winning anything in 2020.
Third point: Population control must start with the elderly, especially those of poor health who are the biggest strain on the social safety net and healthcare systems.
Fourth point: Democrats needed a mechanism to mobilize their lazy arse base permanently as well as shield long suspected vote harvesting schemes. as well as stifle voter ID laws gaining traction across the country.
Fifth point: China was uniquely in position to profit off of PPE sales, test kits, and other medical products stockpiled by governments all over the world for COVID preparedness.
This post was edited on 1/11/22 at 9:26 am
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:26 am to Deege
You have to control the population before you enact your population control measures. This is phase 1, then Brandon will build it/us back better.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:35 am to dcbl
quote:
if so, they did a shitty job
99% + survival rate...
Came here to say this. It is being used for control, but not population control.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:35 am to Ponchy Tiger
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:37 am to Ponchy Tiger
And cuts payout on SS!
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:40 am to Ponchy Tiger
I don’t think so. But it wouldn’t surprise me if it was.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:41 am to Ponchy Tiger
Probably a test run. They likely have more lethal viruses planned in the future.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:42 am to Deege
quote:
designed so much for population control as for control of the population
Both
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:44 am to dcbl
quote:
if so, they did a shitty job
99% + survival rate...
Think about it. The greatest danger is to older people and people with serious health conditions. Older people are no longer productive (paying taxes) and are drawing down pension systems. They are also the greatest users of health systems.
Getting rid of massive numbers of people in these two classes relieves pressure on health systems and stops the drain on pension systems.
I'm not saying I agree with the premise, but giving the total disregard for human life that the left has, it is at least something to consider.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:46 am to Ponchy Tiger
More likely was that it is a response to Trumps China policies. He was really fricking up their economy.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:47 am to Ponchy Tiger
This is about money like 99% of the things in this world is about money. Pfizer and Moderna are getting fat. If you asked them they'd love another 300 million in the population to buy their fake vaccine so they can make more money.
I'm a project planner for a plant that makes water monitoring and filtration systems. Our suppliers can't get us raw material to build units. It is not a fake issue. Because the suppliers want to make money just like we want to make units to make money.
quote:
faux supply chain issues
I'm a project planner for a plant that makes water monitoring and filtration systems. Our suppliers can't get us raw material to build units. It is not a fake issue. Because the suppliers want to make money just like we want to make units to make money.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:57 am to Ponchy Tiger
The people that believe in human population engineering want what they believe is a sustainable world population of 500 million.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News