Started By
Message

re: Let's have a sensible discussion about gun ownership, this could get good...or heated.

Posted on 3/28/23 at 8:26 pm to
Posted by Gideon Swashbuckler
Member since Sep 2019
5775 posts
Posted on 3/28/23 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

Here's my suggestion for gun control:
1. possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime-
min. 25 yrs in jail, no parole.
2. discharging a firearm during the commission of a crime -
min 50 yrs in jail


How about just convict the criminal of the crime and not the constitutional protected right to bear a firearm??

If you have to add "during the commission of a crime" to any crime, you need to adjust the penalties of the actual crimes committed.

As far as gun control, if the Govt can have it, then so should I.
This post was edited on 3/28/23 at 8:29 pm
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71345 posts
Posted on 3/28/23 at 8:33 pm to
Anything the national guard can own a citizen should be able to own. I find everything else to be lacking, and anyone who gives an inch on gun laws deserves the mile they will take. Gun control groups have lied out of their arse to attempt to screw us out of our rights.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71345 posts
Posted on 3/28/23 at 8:34 pm to
quote:

1. possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime-
min. 25 yrs in jail, no parole.


That won't be abused at all.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
10935 posts
Posted on 3/28/23 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

1. possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime-
min. 25 yrs in jail, no parole.


So having a pistol in your car when you get out to beat a road-blocking protester's arse?

Having a pistol in your car when you as a minor, get some beer?
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
16993 posts
Posted on 3/28/23 at 9:15 pm to
I would like to see there be more restrictions on crazy people.

A question for gun store employees: Do you have to sell to a person who passes the background or can you refuse if you feel uneasy?
Posted by GAFF
Georgia
Member since Aug 2010
2450 posts
Posted on 3/28/23 at 9:26 pm to
Can't really go with "anyone who is mentally ill can't have a gun" either. Cause whoever determines what "mentally ill" is controls who has the guns.

Shall not be infringed. I don't care how you try to define it. If the Founding Father's didn't want us owning cannons(missiles) and warships(tanks) they would have said so. Also, let's think logically for a moment. Who can really afford any of that anyways? The ones that could afford it would be under a microscope by the ATF. It's not like people would have a cache of RPG's and Stinger's in their garage and no one know. Just like everyone knew who had a cannon back in the day.

Edit to add:
In my opinion the best gun control isn't creating laws against the gun but to create and ENFORCE laws to make people be familiar with guns. My in-laws aren't anti gun but were never a "gun family". I remember them commenting how seeing my pistol on my dresser made them uncomfortable. No one touching it or holding it. Just in its holster on top of my dresser. The country has gotten away from making people comfortable with guns and being around guns. We need to change that.
This post was edited on 3/28/23 at 9:56 pm
Posted by Oneforthemoney
New Iberia, La
Member since Dec 2013
1780 posts
Posted on 3/28/23 at 9:31 pm to
Whatever the military has for handhelds, so should the public. How else are people gonna stand up against a tyrannical govt.
This post was edited on 3/28/23 at 9:32 pm
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
10935 posts
Posted on 3/28/23 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

Can't really go with "no one who is mentally ill can't have a gun" either.


I folded on that boss, I concede.

Background: My sister got on meth in the early 80's. She was later diagnosed as paranoid schizophrenic. She honestly believed that the gays were out to ruin her life and possibly kill her for not converting. She made a valid attempt at suicide.

I wouldn't want her, if she were alive, having a firearm.
Could she do what she wanted with a butcher knife?
Probably so, but I doubt she would have because of the messiness of it all.

Still I concede.
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18070 posts
Posted on 3/28/23 at 9:37 pm to
Maybe we should simply red flag mentally ill people and consider obvious warning signs like trying to dress like the opposite sex and thinking that you can be whatever sex you can make up.
Posted by GAFF
Georgia
Member since Aug 2010
2450 posts
Posted on 3/28/23 at 9:46 pm to
While I feel the same way,
quote:

simply red flag mentally ill people
is the worst possible action. What happens when the gov't decides that "conservative right wing" people are mentally ill? Going the mentally ill route just gives the gov't an easier path to disarming the citizens.
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18070 posts
Posted on 3/28/23 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

What happens when the gov't decides that "conservative right wing" people are mentally ill?


We ignore it. I'm not for red flag laws, BTW. I was speaking more that these people are obviously insane. I'll only give up my firearms when government gives up their's first. Even then, I likely wouldn't.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
45989 posts
Posted on 3/28/23 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

Can't really go with "no one who is mentally ill can't have a gun" either. Cause whoever determines what "mentally ill" is controls who has the guns.


You make a good point.

There was a time not long ago when mental health professionals could generally agree on what the various types and definitions of mental illness were. I think today there's a divide among mental health professionals on whether gender confusion/dsyphoria is a mental illness. I think if anorexia nervosa is considered a mental illness it goes without saying gender dsyphoria is also a mental illness. Either way it seems the majority of mass murders are committed by people who had a history of mental illness and most were on some type of prescription psychotropic drug.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16541 posts
Posted on 3/28/23 at 10:07 pm to
No more compromise on gun-control, frick those that rally to the cry of "common sense fun laws". There is no discussion to be had, attack every gun law in the courts now and start going after gun-control groups next.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
13316 posts
Posted on 3/28/23 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

It is 100% up for debate, hence all of the amendments.


No, it really isn’t. Either it is upheld, or it is violated. It has been violated time and again, and continues to be violated daily, but that’s no excuse to compound the tyranny.

quote:

The fact that the left and right can even agree on how the 2nd amendment should be interpreted is a good example of why this debate should happen.


Which is complete hogwash manufactured by tyrants who know that they can never control an armed populace. Only the ignorant think they need an interpretation for a phrase that includes the words, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18070 posts
Posted on 3/28/23 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

No more compromise on gun-control, frick those that rally to the cry of "common sense fun laws". There is no discussion to be had, attack every gun law in the courts now and start going after gun-control groups next.


Amen
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
4331 posts
Posted on 3/28/23 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

Anything the national guard can own a citizen should be able to own. I find everything else to be lacking, and anyone who gives an inch on gun laws deserves the mile they will take. Gun control groups have lied out of their arse to attempt to screw us out of our rights.


Outstanding ….

Posted by bulldog95
North Louisiana
Member since Jan 2011
20700 posts
Posted on 3/28/23 at 10:28 pm to
Back in the mafia days they had tommy guns and all other sorts of fully automatic guns and there was mass gang killings but the mafia kept the cities under control unlike today when fully automatic guns are illegal yet criminals run Willy nilly and there are more mass shootings that we know of

Criminals only fear those with the ability to stop or kill them. Ever notice how most mass shooting happen where there are none or very few legal gun owners carrying. Anytime a mass shooting is attempted where legal gun owners are carrying it’s usually stopped with extreme predjudice by said gun owner.

Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
77938 posts
Posted on 3/28/23 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

many believe the banning of AR-15s and AK47 type rifles will greatly reduce the occurrence of mass shootings


I can buy a 50 round drum mag for a Glock 19 pistol
Posted by USMCguy121
Northshore
Member since Aug 2021
6332 posts
Posted on 3/28/23 at 10:42 pm to
I don't support gun banning at all. It absolutely is a necessity because of social and demographic realities. If we were a homogenous culture with mostly shared values then it could work. But we are not and we will never be.

Take guns out and you just hand power to criminals.

See Mexico, its exactly what happened and what would happen here. Banned guns, 2 years later Cartels rolled in and nobody could stop them.

In southern Mexico farther from the reach of the government people stayed armed and have pushed the cartels out with local militias.


I will admit however that the average american especially the school shooter types are such lazy pieces of shite that if you made it the least bit challenging to get a weapon, they wouldn't bother. And maybe that's an answer. Make it so fricking frustrating that the pieces of shite weed themselves out.


As for real solutions, armed security at EVERY school, Create some jobs. Christians and christian schools need to wake the frick up. I'm sure the families spending shitloads on tuition won't mind ponying up for security at this point.
Posted by FATBOY TIGER
Valhalla
Member since Jan 2016
8835 posts
Posted on 3/29/23 at 7:12 am to
quote:

It is 100% up for debate, hence all of the amendments.




quote:

interpreted


None is needed. How do you interpret the speed limit?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram