- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/3/26 at 3:17 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:How the Constitution reads:
Lawmakers want billionaires to foot the bill for $3,000 payouts to American households
How the Democrats view the Constitution:

Posted on 3/3/26 at 3:21 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Bernie no one needs more than 1M dollars.
Net worth gets to 1M - No one needs more than 5M dollars
Net worth gets to 5M - No one needs more than 10M
Net worth gets to 10M - No one needs more than 20M
Also, no one needs more than 1 house. 3 houses later..
Net worth gets to 1M - No one needs more than 5M dollars
Net worth gets to 5M - No one needs more than 10M
Net worth gets to 10M - No one needs more than 20M
Also, no one needs more than 1 house. 3 houses later..
Posted on 3/3/26 at 3:56 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
I'm shocked that a Socialist wants to redistribute someone else's wealth.
I bet if you changed it to any politician worth more than $1 Million, then Bernie would STFU.
I bet if you changed it to any politician worth more than $1 Million, then Bernie would STFU.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 4:04 pm to hawkeye007
quote:
I am still waiting on my tariff check Trump promised me.
You’ll have to wait to see if the court rules for refunds before you can get a check. I’m surprised your income didn’t phase you out from that program.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 4:08 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
The measure would direct new tax revenue toward one-time $3,000 payments for individuals in households earning $150,000 or less, meaning a family of four could receive up to $12,000.
Why the $150,000 cutoff? That’s just a couple of middle class workers in many major metro areas. Two teachers with a little experience, nurse and a welder, etc.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 4:13 pm to BBONDS25
I don't get checks from the govt in any form. I write them one every April.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 4:39 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
So dems aren’t for the rule of law now? Because SCOTUS held that a federal wealth tax was unconstitutional nearly 100 years ago.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 4:42 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:Well shite, they aren’t even going to pay down the debt with it?
The measure would direct new tax revenue toward one-time $3,000 payments for individuals in households earning $150,000 or less, meaning a family of four could receive up to $12,000
Posted on 3/3/26 at 4:56 pm to TBoy
quote:
A lot of right wingers were cheering Trump's $2,000 per person "tariff dividend." This is the back side of the same coin.
The rationale was to reimburse for the increase in prices. Re-balancing trade was thought to be necessary and after the fact has had minimal negative impact on most people who don't farm, and by the way he did help farmers, but he didn't send $2000.00 to everyone.
Are you not able to admit tariffs worked? They worked so well dimtards in congress ran to the courts to stop them.
Now what is the rationale for the billionaire money giveaway?
Posted on 3/3/26 at 4:59 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
I remember when Millionaires were the bad guys.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 5:08 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
This is complete and utter nonsense. Illegal, as well,
Posted on 3/3/26 at 5:09 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Funny to see most people that would benefit from 3k be against it because they don't want to tax billionaires.
3k to households is a better use of tax funds than the billions of dollars from the common mans taxes that go to foreign countries or to making one interceptor missile to protect Qatar
3k to households is a better use of tax funds than the billions of dollars from the common mans taxes that go to foreign countries or to making one interceptor missile to protect Qatar
Posted on 3/3/26 at 5:35 pm to hawkeye007
quote:
I don't get checks from the govt in any form. I write them one every April.
Then why did you say you were waiting for the refund check? Hmmmm
And why aren’t you paying quarterlies? Hmmmm
Posted on 3/3/26 at 5:38 pm to Wwarmouth
quote:
Funny to see most people that would benefit from 3k be against it because they don't want to tax billionaires.
Because people with any semblance of self-worth don’t feel entitled to other people’s money. Tell us…why do you feel entitled to other people’s money? What have you done to deserve it? Be specific.
quote:
3k to households is a better use of tax funds than the billions of dollars from the common mans taxes that go to foreign countries or to making one interceptor missile to protect Qatar
Good lord. Your knowledge of how taxes work is pathetic. This is a new tax being proposed. You and I agree the spending is the problem. Not the revenue.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 5:43 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Communism at its finest!
Posted on 3/3/26 at 5:53 pm to TBoy
quote:
Free money is bad economic policy.
The right side of the political aisle used to believe this. Conservatives still do.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 5:58 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Just a reminder: Any Federal wealth tax is unconstitutional on it's face. The constitution is quite explicit about what can be taxed by the Federal government, and wealth isn't included.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 6:07 pm to TBoy
quote:
Call it a "Trump Rebate" and there will be universal support here.
Naw, frick that household income cap
This post was edited on 3/3/26 at 6:09 pm
Posted on 3/3/26 at 6:18 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
frick those Marxist traitors. I don't want any fricking money from billionaires.
Popular
Back to top


1





