- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:08 pm to LSUintheNW
quote:
I just perused twitter and it's mind boggling how many stupid people are in this country.
This. I cant read more than a few of the tweets about #rittenhouse it is full of so much stupidity
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:09 pm to theducks
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:09 pm to TDTOM
quote:
How does this work? What if it isn't unanimous?
hung jury and do-over
though I could see the judge then using a direct verdict due to issues during the trial if the jury does come back with a hung result
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:09 pm to Centinel
quote:
You wouldn't call violating a defendant's constitutional rights an egregious error?
The judge didn't think it was an error.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:09 pm to jp4lsu
quote:
Would the best thing be for this to be a directed verdict from judge?
Seems to me that would be best for Kyle. But there might be concern of more civil unrest that way as opposed to the jury deciding. Since this prosecution is obviously political the judge would have to have some stones to do it. Somebody correct me if im wrong.
This post was edited on 11/10/21 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:09 pm to LSUintheNW
quote:
I just perused twitter and it's mind boggling how many stupid people are in this country.
Well its twitter...

Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:10 pm to rt3
quote:
hung jury and do-over
So, it will never be finished? I doubt you ever get unanimous either way.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:11 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
About to resume
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:11 pm to alphaandomega
quote:
Well its twitter...
I know but it still just amazes me sometimes. I shouldn't be amazed.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:11 pm to LSUintheNW
Defense requesting a mistrial with prejudice!
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:11 pm to southern686
frick here we go with mistrial motion....
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:12 pm to jaytothen
Pretty sure the Defense is about to ask for Mistrial.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:12 pm to jaytothen
Why would they ask for a mistrial?
ETA: With prejudice?
ETA: With prejudice?
This post was edited on 11/10/21 at 1:13 pm
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:13 pm to jaytothen
I feel the defense is about to go for a mistrial.
***EDIT***
They are definitely pushing for that.
***EDIT***
They are definitely pushing for that.
This post was edited on 11/10/21 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:13 pm to TDTOM
quote:
Why would they ask for a mistrial?
"with prejudice" is the key part of this.
Back to top


2









