- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial - Day 7
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:01 pm to CU_Tigers4life
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:01 pm to CU_Tigers4life
that is if its a normal mistrial.. If Judge rules mistrial with perjury.. Case can't be try again
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:01 pm to Fireman17
quote:
The Judge in the Kyle Rittenhouse case is determined to have Rittenhouse acquitted for murdering two innocent people. This will be nothing less than a signal to every white supremacist in the US (there are millions) that they have a license to kill anyone they want.
Oh they big mad
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:01 pm to EvrybodysAllAmerican
quote:I think the state gets a do over with mistrial. But I also think this judge does not believe Kyle should have to go through this again. The judge does not want a mistrial I would expect him to take this away from the jury and give a direct verdict.
Sorry if this is a dumb question...I have seen some people saying the prosecutor is aiming for a mistrial at this point. What would be the benefit of that? Does that mean it all has to start all over because he's losing so bad?
Or does it mean it gets dismissed and thrown out and he doesnt have to take the L.
I’m obviously not an attorney and certainly have idea about Wisconsin law.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:01 pm to CU_Tigers4life
This lead defense attorney is gonna make bank on future high profile cases. Been amazing.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:01 pm to Centinel
Weren't they supposed to come back at 12:45? I wonder what's taking so long.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:02 pm to EvrybodysAllAmerican
quote:
.I have seen some people saying the prosecutor is aiming for a mistrial at this point. What would be the benefit of that? Does that mean it all has to start all over because he's losing so bad?
If it's a mistrial, they can try it again. Unless the judge orders a mistrial with prejudice, then it is over.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:02 pm to Oddibe
quote:
I think the state gets a do over with mistrial.
If its dismissed with prejudice?
ETA. Thank you WBPTiger
This post was edited on 11/10/21 at 1:03 pm
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:03 pm to Fireman17
quote:
that is if its a normal mistrial.. If Judge rules mistrial with perjury.. Case can't be try again
prejudice, not perjury
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:03 pm to roadGator
Would the best thing be for this to be a directed verdict from judge?
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:03 pm to Caraway Rye
quote:
If they lose a case they never had whats the difference? Screwing the frick out of Kyle and people like him.
Thats the only goal. Nothing more or less.
Screwing him harder with a BS conviction is just cherries on the tops
Yes yes yes
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:04 pm to CU_Tigers4life
quote:No way. They've already shown they have no case and shouldn't be here to begin with.
He would probably let it die.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:04 pm to Oddibe
quote:
I think the state gets a do over with mistrial. But I also think this judge does not believe Kyle should have to go through this again. The judge does not want a mistrial I would expect him to take this away from the jury and give a direct verdict.
I’m obviously not an attorney and certainly have idea about Wisconsin law.
He's already intimated mistrial with prejudice due to the ADA's actions.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:04 pm to EvrybodysAllAmerican
I don’t believe the Judge will declare a mistrial without some really egregious errors, like jury tampering/witness tampering. I also don’t believe the judge will issue a direct verdict. This thing will finish, it will go to the jury. It’s the only way it can happen.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Oh they big mad
Only in the US can you be a mixed race kid who shoots three white guys, two of whom are felons, be labeled a white supremacists because of it.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:05 pm to MikeAV8s
are we back live? what happened to bing?
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:05 pm to Caraway Rye
quote:
This guy would convict you if some woman was up there making tears come up
Whoa man, calm down. Did you not read the post?
I just thought it was odd he didnt have actual streaming tears. Ive never had a panic attack and that seems to be what most people think it was not emotions that would cause tears. Im so fascinated by the psychology of the whole trial, Binger being a dick, the more relaxed tone of the defense in general, the judge, and of course Kyle and his reactions. No one said anything about convicting him because he was fake crying. Did I say he was fake crying? Chill yourself friend.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:05 pm to MikeAV8s
quote:
it will go to the jury.
How does this work? What if it isn't unanimous?
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:06 pm to MikeAV8s
quote:
without some really egregious errors
You wouldn't call violating a defendant's constitutional rights an egregious error?
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:06 pm to Ted2010
quote:
Boy I stirred up a hornet's nest on Twitter by using #FreeKyleRittenhouse It's awesome.
I just perused twitter and it's mind boggling how many stupid people are in this country.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:07 pm to Meauxjeaux
the judge is trying to do everything within his power to avoid a mistrial b/c he probably has a read that a not guilty verdict is better than a mistrial... whether it be with or without prejudice
but if the prosecutor gives him 1 more reason to declare a mistrial with prejudice... I think he takes it
but if the prosecutor gives him 1 more reason to declare a mistrial with prejudice... I think he takes it
Back to top



2









