- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:52 am
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:52 am
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/11/26 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:54 am to OMLandshark
She should recuse herself on any case regarding sex/gender. She doesn't even know what sex she is.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:54 am to OMLandshark
SFP will be along shortly to white knight for her / him.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:55 am to OMLandshark
Good thing for me then I don’t believe in either one
Posted on 12/4/24 at 11:48 am to OMLandshark
Black woman with three names = trouble
Posted on 12/4/24 at 11:53 am to OMLandshark
Isn't she the math genius who figured out how to land on the moon too?
Posted on 12/4/24 at 11:55 am to OMLandshark
So now she's a biologist?
Posted on 12/4/24 at 11:56 am to OMLandshark
I hope the Decatur and Tiger Doc Klan are proud of this idiot.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 11:59 am to Rebel
quote:
SFP will be along shortly to white knight for her / him.
Not specifically, but a lot of these discussions will devolve back to Loving and Griswold because they all rely on the same operative nucleus of legal rhetoric.
And don't take my word for it, listen to Clarence Thomas on the issue
LINK
quote:
Justice Clarence Thomas argued in a concurring opinion released on Friday that the Supreme Court “should reconsider” its past rulings codifying rights to contraception access, same-sex relationships and same-sex marriage.
The sweeping suggestion from the current court’s longest-serving justice came in the concurring opinion he authored in response to the court’s ruling revoking the constitutional right to abortion, also released on Friday.
In his concurring opinion, Thomas — an appointee of President George H.W. Bush — wrote that the justices “should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell” — referring to three cases having to do with Americans’ fundamental privacy, due process and equal protection rights.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 11:59 am to OMLandshark
So Clarence Thomas is most certainly a proponent of banning sex changes for children.
Clarence Thomas is also in an interracial marriage.
She has to be the dumbest SCJ in history.
Clarence Thomas is also in an interracial marriage.
She has to be the dumbest SCJ in history.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:00 pm to OMLandshark
Is this the one who could not say what a woman IS?
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:00 pm to OMLandshark
If she wasn’t black she wouldn’t be very smart
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:01 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Ketanji Brown Jackson
is a legit retard like Harris
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:01 pm to themunch
quote:
Is this the one who could not say what a woman IS?
Correct. She was either too cowardly or too stupid to say what a woman is.
But somehow she believes it's okay to chop off a confused little boy's penis. And it's the same thing as allowing interracial marriage.
This post was edited on 12/4/24 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Justice Clarence Thomas argued in a concurring opinion released on Friday that the Supreme Court “should reconsider” its past rulings codifying rights to contraception access, same-sex relationships and same-sex marriage
Those are consenting adults in those circumstances. We’re in uncharted territory here, with impressionable children, and “adults” making irreversible, life-altering decisions for them.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:03 pm to OMLandshark
Any Senator that voted for her to be confirmed as a damn Supreme Court judge should be relieved of their Senate seat.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not specifically, but a lot of these discussions will devolve back to Loving and Griswold because they all rely on the same operative nucleus of legal rhetoric.
No, these are not the same "operative nucleus" as allowing children to be mutilated under the guise of morality and affirmation.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:06 pm to OMLandshark
Not surprising coming from the DEI hire.
This clown is exactly why Trump should implement the democrats threat to pack the SCOTUS with about 10-12 more ultra conservative justices.
This clown is exactly why Trump should implement the democrats threat to pack the SCOTUS with about 10-12 more ultra conservative justices.
Popular
Back to top

37













