- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Ketanji Brown Jackson is a fascist who should be removed from the Court
Posted on 3/25/24 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 3/25/24 at 3:45 pm
Ketanji Brown Jackson is a fascist who should be removed from the Court
Ketanji Brown Jackson, is concerned the First Amendment is “hamstringing the government.”
That’s a 5-alarm fire of a pull-quote from a sitting Supreme Court justice, and she should absolutely be impeached and removed from the Court over it. I’m as serious as a heart attack here. Nearly every sentence of this single thought of hers adds up to textbook fascism, (a hybrid economic system in which the private economy exists but under strict state regulations, and must give way to the national interest, which is whatever the government says it is.) So, let’s go. First the full quote, directly from the SCOTUS transcript, followed by seven handpicked doozies worth analyzing:
JUSTICE JACKSON: So my biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important time periods. I mean, what would -- what would you have the government do? I’ve heard you say a couple times that the government can post its own speech, but in my hypothetical, you know, kids, this is not safe, don’t do it, is not going to get it done. And so I guess some might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to protect the citizens of this country, and you seem to be suggesting that that duty cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring platforms to take down harmful information. So can you help me? Because I’m really -- I’m really worried about that because you’ve got the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening circumstances from the government’s perspective and you’re saying that the government can’t interact with the source of those problems.
LINK
Ketanji Brown Jackson, is concerned the First Amendment is “hamstringing the government.”
That’s a 5-alarm fire of a pull-quote from a sitting Supreme Court justice, and she should absolutely be impeached and removed from the Court over it. I’m as serious as a heart attack here. Nearly every sentence of this single thought of hers adds up to textbook fascism, (a hybrid economic system in which the private economy exists but under strict state regulations, and must give way to the national interest, which is whatever the government says it is.) So, let’s go. First the full quote, directly from the SCOTUS transcript, followed by seven handpicked doozies worth analyzing:
JUSTICE JACKSON: So my biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important time periods. I mean, what would -- what would you have the government do? I’ve heard you say a couple times that the government can post its own speech, but in my hypothetical, you know, kids, this is not safe, don’t do it, is not going to get it done. And so I guess some might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to protect the citizens of this country, and you seem to be suggesting that that duty cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring platforms to take down harmful information. So can you help me? Because I’m really -- I’m really worried about that because you’ve got the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening circumstances from the government’s perspective and you’re saying that the government can’t interact with the source of those problems.
LINK
Posted on 3/25/24 at 3:47 pm to djmed
quote:
Ketanji Brown Jackson
she believes her job is to undermine and ignore the constitution, not rule on things using the constitution as a guiding document
Posted on 3/25/24 at 3:47 pm to djmed
She was one of the most ill-prepared, unprofessional nominees to ever be questioned and yet she was still appointed to check off a box. She's terrible.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 3:48 pm to djmed
quote:
Ketanji Brown Jackson, is concerned the First Amendment is “hamstringing the government.”
She's right, which is what the 1A is supposed to do. People should have the right to speak out against their government without threat of lost freedoms.
She doesn't like it's designed intent, which is really bad.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 3:51 pm to djmed
quote:
JUSTICE JACKSON: So my biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important time periods. I mean, what would -- what would you have the government do? I’ve heard you say a couple times that the government can post its own speech, but in my hypothetical, you know, kids, this is not safe, don’t do it, is not going to get it done. And so I guess some might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to protect the citizens of this country, and you seem to be suggesting that that duty cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring platforms to take down harmful information. So can you help me? Because I’m really -- I’m really worried about that because you’ve got the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening circumstances from the government’s perspective and you’re saying that the government can’t interact with the source of those problems.
This sounds exactly like the opinion of certain people on here and the 2nd Amendment
Posted on 3/25/24 at 3:58 pm to djmed
quote:She's not a biologist, though.
Ketanji Brown Jackson is a fascist
Posted on 3/25/24 at 3:59 pm to djmed
She's got the reasoning skills of a 3rd Grader.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 4:14 pm to MightyYat
quote:
She was one of the most ill-prepared, unprofessional nominees to ever be questioned and yet she was still appointed to check off a box. She's terrible.
I'll match that. Elena Kagan had never held a judgeship before her appointment by Obama to the SC. She did a lot of clerking but no judging.
Let me ponder for a few moments what those two people have in common.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 4:17 pm to djmed
She clearly doesn’t understand the constitution and bill of rights. They purposely RETAIN the rights of the people so the government can’t infringe upon them. You can only hamstring someone or something in one of two ways
1) preventing them from doing something they have a right to do; or
2) preventing them from stopping someone they have a right to stop.
Neither is the case with the First Amendment. Anyone who believes otherwise should be immediately removed from office as failing to uphold their oath to protect and defend the constitution of the United States.
1) preventing them from doing something they have a right to do; or
2) preventing them from stopping someone they have a right to stop.
Neither is the case with the First Amendment. Anyone who believes otherwise should be immediately removed from office as failing to uphold their oath to protect and defend the constitution of the United States.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 4:44 pm to Homesick Tiger
quote:
Elena Kagan had never held a judgeship before her appointment by Obama to the SC. She did a lot of clerking but no judging.
Let me ponder for a few moments what those two people have in common.
Let's be honest, Zero was nothing before he became president. He was given a senate seat after a giant political scandal, and he held that seat for what a year maybe?
Before that what was he? A community organizer. That's like being a Waffle House regional manager but not having any restaurants to manage.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 4:46 pm to djmed
This apparent woman could not define what a woman is.....clown show and several republicans confirmed her to the SCOTUS.
This post was edited on 3/25/24 at 9:49 pm
Posted on 3/25/24 at 4:47 pm to djmed
She's a puppet supreme. She was only placed in that position because she was female and black. So she'll do and say wtfever her puppeteers tell her. That way she's guaranteed to stay at that position for decades.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 4:53 pm to djmed
Ketanji Brown Jackson is a fascist who never should have been allowed anywhere near the Court.
Fixed.
Fixed.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 4:58 pm to djmed
Agree she should be removed, but for being a complete moron. An imbecile. An idiot.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 5:04 pm to michael corleone
quote:
She clearly doesn’t understand the constitution and bill of right
This is how most Republicans think; "if lefties could just read more of the Federalist Papers, or letters from Thomas Jefferson, they'd get it!" The proper way to say this is the left doesn't understand, and doesn't care.
They give zero fricks, it's all about power.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 5:05 pm to djmed
So why did republicans confirm her?
Posted on 3/25/24 at 5:07 pm to djmed
quote:
I’m really worried about that because you’ve got the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening circumstances from the government’s perspective and you’re saying that the government can’t interact with the source of those problems.
They can interact with the sources of those problems which I assume she means Twitter, Facebook, etc. just like anyone else. The government is free to express their opinion on whatever the issue may be....They can't suppress others from expressing their opinion.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 5:09 pm to Jack Daniel
quote:
So why did republicans confirm her?
Republicans didn't confirm her. Romney, Murkowski, and Collins confirmed her.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 5:13 pm to keakar
quote:
she believes her job is to undermine and ignore the constitution, not rule on things using the constitution as a guiding document
This is the very definition of a progressive. They want to evolve beyond the constitution through 1) selective prosecution, and 2) the judiciary by establishing radical judicial precedent.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News