- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/22/22 at 4:56 pm to Cali 4 LSU
quote:
NO STATE should do mass mail-in voting. It's ridiculous & creates doubt in elections.
Some states have done this for years with no issues. This belief that mail in voting is corrupt is a very recent one.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 4:57 pm to LSU2ALA
This closing seriously reminds me of the Chewbacca Defense. "It doesn't make sense!!"
Posted on 12/22/22 at 4:58 pm to loogaroo
quote:
There is no harm in redoing the election in Maricopa County.
Can it just be redone in Maricopa or is it a new statewide election? I don't see either being allowed but does anyone know before I look up the Arizona statutes?
Posted on 12/22/22 at 4:58 pm to LSU2ALA
quote:
Would the county have to prove they followed their procedures or would Lake first have to prove they didn’t?
She did. Didn't a witness testify yesterday saying they didn't follow chain of custody. Then the state, who should have proof they did, can't provide it?
Check out the link I posted above from Timcast where he addresses this.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 4:59 pm to rumproast
quote:
This closing seriously reminds me of the Chewbacca Defense. "It doesn't make sense!!"
That's exactly what I didn't like about it. What is a Wookie doing on Endor? It doesn't make sense.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:01 pm to LSU2ALA
quote:
Some states have done this for years with no issues.
How do we know? And I wouldn't agree but I'm one person.
quote:
This belief that mail in voting is corrupt is a very recent one.
Why is that? And again, I wouldn't agree but I'm one person.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:01 pm to rumproast
The judge has nothing to lose by ordering another election.
It's an impartial and fair decision.
The question is...how is it conducted?
It's an impartial and fair decision.
The question is...how is it conducted?
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:01 pm to Cali 4 LSU
quote:
She did. Didn't a witness testify yesterday saying they didn't follow chain of custody. Then the state, who should have proof they did, can't provide it?
Right, but I never heard them intimate they didn’t follow their own process or that the process was in violation of state law. In other words, it may not be a great process for chain of custody, but if they did follow it, I don’t see a judge getting involved on that unless it’s just egregiously bad.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:01 pm to LSU2ALA
quote:
Some states have done this for years with no issues. This belief that mail in voting is corrupt is a very recent one.
How do you know it isn't corrupt? Are the states so blue it doesn't matter? Or atleast it doesn't seem to make a difference?
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:02 pm to MFn GIMP
Slick Wille Stallone got destroyed when the answers on the laptop didnt come in fast enough . 
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:02 pm to LSU2ALA
quote:
This belief that mail in voting is corrupt is a very recent one.
I don't think that's true. It's just that mail-in voting is now such a huge thing that it has exacerbated the potential fraud whereas in the past it was a small percentage of total votes so it only mattered in very close elections.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:03 pm to MFn GIMP
is the proposed remedy a new election?
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:03 pm to LSU2ALA
quote:
but if they did follow it,
No, per a Sworn witness with data. BUT the state can't say "yes we did, here is the proof:" which, by law, they must maintain. Maybe I'm wrong on this but it's my understanding.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:04 pm to BHTiger
quote:
How do you know it isn't corrupt? Are the states so blue it doesn't matter? Or atleast it doesn't seem to make a difference?
I know Utah has done it for a while as has Colorado. One red and one purple.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:04 pm to CelticDog
quote:
is the proposed remedy a new election?
I believe they are asking to either name Lake the winner or order a new election. I'm just not sure if a new election would be Maricopa County only or the entire State.
ETA: None of that is going to happen even though I think Lake should get a new election based on this evidence.
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 5:05 pm
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:06 pm to CelticDog
quote:
is the proposed remedy a new election?
After the first couple days of totally Tea-bagging the Hobbs sham . What is CuckDogs solution to the fraud ? Be honest.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:07 pm to LSU2ALA
Even if they followed their policies and processes, that doesn't mean those processes are adequate to meet Constitutional requirements.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:08 pm to MFn GIMP
16% higher voter turnout? Absolutely not, it is a complete mischaracterization of Baris' testimony and the math. If only 2.5% of outstanding voters on election day was depressed because of the issues that is 22,500 votes and a 78/22 split of that 22,500 for Lake would have her the election. The election day split was 70/30 and it's an easy argument that those who didn't vote because they were seeing Lake voters having issues would've been higher than the 70/30 split she did get.
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 5:09 pm
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:08 pm to DreauxB2015
This lady isn't even arguing. She is reading... 
Page 22 of 25
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News