- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:35 pm to NC_Tigah
I was going to say...this makes it worse. Why didn't their so called "Root Cause Analysis" fix it after 2020. Lake NEEDS to win this and clean up all this shite like Desantis did in Florida. It is ridiculous!!! 
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:35 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
People appearing remotely drives me crazy. They really can't show up after being subpoenaed?
This...and why is it almost always the other side?
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:37 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
quote:
Holy shite he just said they also had these same issues in November 2020. Shocking.
He said it with a smile, no less.
It's a feature.
They cannot afford to lose the ability to rig elections in AZ.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:42 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Holy shite he just said they also had these same issues in November 2020. Shocking.
He said it with a smile, no less
Plus, if these issues only started in 2020, when Trump was pushing his supporters to only vote in-person, and not before that makes it even more suspect in my mind.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:46 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
The last answer where he said the printer settings were changed on election day absolutely proves intentionality in my mind.
The intent has to be to alter the results of the election. Not to attempt to fix an issue with the printers/tabulators.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:51 pm to MFn GIMP
This guy is reading a script.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:51 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
The intent has to be to alter the results of the election. Not to attempt to fix an issue with the printers/tabulators.
They said the test run the night before was perfect.
What needed to be fixed besides the results?
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:52 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
The intent has to be to alter the results of the election. Not to attempt to fix an issue with the printers/tabulators.
The last witness testified that testing showed no issues at all and that a tech made changes on election day. After showing no issues.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:53 pm to MFn GIMP
This guy is going to say he's not reading something where he looks straight at the camera when listening to the question and then immediately loos down and to the right when answering. He is clearly reading.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:54 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:Let's see, the saying goes "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
The intent has to be to alter the results of the election. Not to attempt to fix an issue with the printers/tabulators.
Except in AZ apparently it's:
Fool me once (Aug 2020), shame on you.
Fool me twice (Nov 2020), shame on you.
Fool me 3 times (Aug 2022), shame on you.
Fool me 4 times (Nov 2022), shame on you.
That about sum it up?
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:56 pm to NC_Tigah
He had to look down at his script to answer "no" Jesus .
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:57 pm to MFn GIMP
He's not even smart enough to do a half Teams half word document view on his main screen so it's not so obvious.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 4:01 pm to MFn GIMP
Look how he froze up in answering when looking straight ahead. As soon as he looked back at his script he picked it right back up. This is absolutely absurd.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 4:02 pm to MFn GIMP
Can't read a script on cross....... That is where the lawyer for the plaintiff should tee off.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 4:05 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
The intent has to be to alter the results of the election. Not to attempt to fix an issue with the printers/tabulators.
Why? Same result either way.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 4:07 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
He is clearly reading.
Would constitute cheating on a test.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 4:07 pm to Cali 4 LSU
This is one of the reason I hate video testimony. I just can't get over how obvious it is that he is reading his answers.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 4:08 pm to MFn GIMP
What the hell is wrong with this judge!? I'm beginning to understand why you have little hope... 
Posted on 12/22/22 at 4:12 pm to Cali 4 LSU
He just repositioned himself to make it less obvious that he's reading. It's still obvious but he's not so blatantly looking down/right now.
Page 19 of 25
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News