- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Justice Department Considering Pushing to Ban Transgendered People from Owning Firearms
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:21 pm to wackatimesthree
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:21 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:If you want to disarm people base on the proclivities of the group, you’d first disarm Black people. Then you’d come for the rednecks. Then… well… don’t make me post the cheesy poem.
If the research shows that those populations are likely to be a danger to themselves or others, as with people who have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria, why do you think it's responsible to sell them a gun?
The idea that our rights are collective, not individual rights is the first step to losing them.
1
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:24 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Then you’d come for the rednecks.
Easy now.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:25 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:Rights aren’t defined as “is this a good idea” I think socialism is a terrible idea, but I don’t want to take away their freedom of speech.
Why is it you think it's a good idea to sell a gun to some one diagnosed with PTSD with hallucinations and violent tendencies?
And further, how the hell is the government suppposed to psychologically evaluate who is a “good idea” or “bad ideal to own guns? Doing it by association is the ultimate abuse of government power… is the very reason we have the 2A.
If the government can say “we don’t like that group, so we’ll ban them”… it’s over.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:26 pm to FATBOY TIGER
quote:
Easy now.
This post was edited on 9/4/25 at 5:28 pm
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:27 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
You tell ME whether there is any population on planet earth that you would deny the sale of a gun to, and if so, why.
Shall.
Not.
Be.
Infringed.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:29 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Rights aren’t defined as “is this a good idea” I think socialism is a terrible idea, but I don’t want to take away their freedom of speech.
And further, how the hell is the government suppposed to psychologically evaluate who is a “good idea” or “bad ideal to own guns? Doing it by association is the ultimate abuse of government power… is the very reason we have the 2A.
If the government can say “we don’t like that group, so we’ll ban them”… it’s over.
But you didn't answer the question.
Not a single group?
A five year old can buy a gun if he's got the bread?
A mentally retarded person? A paroled murderer?
Pretty sure the Constitution doesn't say anything specific about any of those groups either.
And again, being black isn't a diagnosis of mental illness or mental incompetence.
Come on, now. Time to test your logic, see if it's consistent.
Is there any population you would deny the purchase of a firearm to, or in your world anybody who has the money gets one?
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:30 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Shall.
Not.
Be.
Infringed.
Y'all.
Sure.
Do.
Avoid.
The question.
Cubbies must have been giving lessons.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:32 pm to wackatimesthree
I answered your question.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:32 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
I think socialism is a terrible idea, but I don’t want to take away their freedom of speech.
And yet freedom of speech is limited isn't it?
Based on it being a danger, if I recall. Yelling fire in a crowded theatre, isn't it?
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:33 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Let's try this a different way. You tell ME whether there is any population on planet earth that you would deny the sale of a gun to, and if so, why.
No...there is not a mentall illness that I would say those that suffer from deserve to have their 2A rights removed for just being diagnosed with that illness. If a doctor along with the courts deem that person mentally unfit then I ll bend. That would be my standard. Will it prevent some insane folks from purchasing firearms as well as a say a simple diagnosis or a affidavit from family to law enforcement or some other lower bar .....no but that is where my line is .....where is yours?
This post was edited on 9/4/25 at 5:34 pm
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:33 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
I answered your question.
Nope.
You avoided answering it because you know that typing out loud that you think a mentally retarded person or a 4 year old ought to be able to buy a gun makes you a fringe idiot.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:34 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
A five year old can buy a gun if he's got the bread?
Hell yea
quote:
A mentally retarded person?
I know a lot of retards that shoot. They love it.
quote:
A paroled murderer?
Paid his debt. Have fun and be safe.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:34 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
No...there is not a mentall illness that I would say those that suffer from deserve to have their 2A rights removed
That wasn't the question.
Dang, cubbies is training ya'll up fast.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:35 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
JohnnyKilroy
That's fine.
From now on I know to ignore anything you have to say about pretty much anything.
Carry on.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:36 pm to wackatimesthree
No one cares.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:38 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Who said we should?
I am for one.
quote:
1. There will be at least one population that you would deny access to. 2. You will do so using the same rationale I am using to deny them to people with this particular mental disorder.
Nope. I even think released felons should be able to legally own a firearm. They’ve paid their debt to society.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:40 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
you're the one who the stigma...hence that comment. An unstable person, temporary or not is NOT hard to define. Nor do the get raided and guns taken away..but it temporarily hinders the ability to purchase more. It's easy to define which conditions are considered dangerous enough to put them on the list.
So I say it should require a court order. ..what say you?
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:46 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
That wasn't the question.
Dang, cubbies is training ya'll up fast.
Hey now.....lol....I'll play along....minors under 18.As to why well it rightly or wrongly generally accepted as the age where we allow citizens to enjoy privileges of.being a responsible adult.
This post was edited on 9/4/25 at 5:49 pm
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:49 pm to JKeller34
quote:
background questionnaire
Shouldn’t exist IMO.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 5:49 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Mentally ill people with violent tendencies do not need firearms.
Page 24 of 28
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News