- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge transgender bathroom restrictions unconstitutional
Posted on 8/13/19 at 1:22 pm to Ted2010
Posted on 8/13/19 at 1:22 pm to Ted2010
quote:
Let me catch a dude in the bathroom with my step-daughter and there’s going to be problems.
And you'd be charged with a hate crime. We've truly lost our dam minds....
0
Posted on 8/13/19 at 1:23 pm to Jjdoc
You got judges making stupid rulings like this but the Dem candidates and senators are telling SCOTUS to heal itself or face restructuring.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 1:24 pm to Jjdoc
quote:I never cease to be entertained by your inability to distinguish between objective legal analysis and personal ideology.quote:Stop defending mentally ill crap man.
Will this show be taking place in a government-owned building?
Not that I am surprised. Not everyone has the ability to conduct that level of analysis, and your every post screams “limited capacity.”
This post was edited on 8/13/19 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 8/13/19 at 1:27 pm to Jjdoc
oh to be in high school again 
Posted on 8/13/19 at 1:36 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I never cease to be entertained by your inability to distinguish between objective legal analysis
It was not objective. As I stated, this will set the stage and legal precedent to be forced into the public because it is based on sex.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 1:49 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
objective legal analysis
I don't think I'd describe that decision so incorrectly then question someone's mental capacity.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 2:05 pm to Flats
He is what he is. He tries to mask his bias as a dem and an attorney.
He knows this sets the stage for expansion because it becomes a protected class.
He knows this sets the stage for expansion because it becomes a protected class.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 2:09 pm to Jjdoc
New Law is real, folks.
Don't doubt me.
Don't doubt me.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 2:13 pm to Jjdoc
Does this count with showers too? Cause I would def be in the locker room post volley ball games if I was still in high school. As long as I'd say I'm a girl, they can't discriminate right?!
Posted on 8/13/19 at 2:15 pm to Jjdoc
Are you scared of taking a piss so close to a woman?
Posted on 8/13/19 at 2:17 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
He tries to mask his bias
He should try harder. A lot harder.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 2:30 pm to AggieHank86
The only reasonable accommodation is if you have a cock you go to the boys room and if you have a pussy you go to the girls room. That’s fricking it because you are what you are born as. End of story.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 2:37 pm to Jjdoc
quote:Good Lord.
He tries to mask his bias as a dem and an attorney.
He knows this sets the stage for expansion because it becomes a protected class.
I entered this thread to respond to a poster who planned to raid the dressing room at a Victoria Secret show based upon this ruling. The ruling TURNED upon the fact that the prohibition was made by governmental entity and would thus have ZERO applicability to the fashion show. I implied as much in a question that I asked said poster. THAT is objective (if a bit sarcastic) analysis.
The ability to grasp this concept is neither Left nor Right. It requires only a basic level of cognition that you (among others) seem to utterly lack.
This entire exchange is a perfect example of the scenario I addressed earlier today ... posters losing their shite because a single post does not address every possible permutation of every issue conceivably arising from every other post on an entire thread.
Do I agree with the ruling itself? Not really, but that is an ENTIRELY different question and NOT one that I addressed either way in my post.
TLDNR. You are a complete fricking moron.
This post was edited on 8/13/19 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 8/13/19 at 2:52 pm to MMauler
quote:
This ignorant Odumbf*ck- appointed c*nt should be impeached IMMEDIATELY.
The only true solution is to hopefully find out the Judge has a daughter and then find out where she pees...
Posted on 8/13/19 at 2:54 pm to MMauler
quote:For what high crime or misdemeanor? A legal analysis with which you disagree?
This ignorant ... c*nt should be impeached IMMEDIATELY.
20 is the over-under on downvotes from people with zero understanding of impeachment.
This post was edited on 8/13/19 at 3:00 pm
Posted on 8/13/19 at 2:55 pm to Jjdoc
Private schools are the only way to go in Obamaland.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 2:59 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
On February 13, 2014, Allen overturned Virginia's statutory same-sex marriage ban, finding the ban unconstitutional. In her ruling, Allen inadvertently attributed the principle that "all men are created equal" to the Constitution, rather than the Declaration of Independence
Lol.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 3:00 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
A legal analysis with which you disagree?
Analysis. Lol.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 3:02 pm to the808bass
She sounds totes qualified.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 3:03 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
schools MUST allow a student who identifies as another sex to use the bathroom they identify with.
Page 2 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News