- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:05 pm to Smart Post
quote:Yes, there was a throwaway line to that effect in the intro to the first draft of the opinion. It was a stupid mis-cite.
It was earlier posted that this judge confused the Constitution with the Declaration of Independence in a previous ruling, but you are still willing to give this judge the benefit of the doubt.
Not sure how a careless reference has any bearing upon whether this judge is a stupid true believer or a disingenuous politico.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:12 pm to AggieHank86
You would pounce on a Republican for doing the same thing.
But when it's a Democrat, it becomes a "throwaway line," among a litany of excuses.
This M.O. carries through with your posting and especially your criticisms.
You're nothing but a charlatan shyster.
But when it's a Democrat, it becomes a "throwaway line," among a litany of excuses.
This M.O. carries through with your posting and especially your criticisms.
You're nothing but a charlatan shyster.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:20 pm to Smart Post
quote:
You would pounce on a Republican for doing the same thing.
Of course he would. The emperor has no clothes and everyone sees it. Hank still pretends he’s wearing a robe.
Reading the opinion reads like a bit from Animal Farm. “Gender is a deeply held internal sense of being a man or woman.” There’s no legal analysis. It’s just “Here’s what your overlords are telling you. Now suck it.”
Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:21 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
stupid true believer or a disingenuous politico.
You understand these are the same correct? The latter begets the former?
But I understand more about you now by your attempt to draw a line between the two.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:31 pm to Jjdoc
My question is, some of these FTM trans people look and dress like men. They have beards even.
Making them go to the bathroom with women is a problem.
Making them go to the bathroom with women is a problem.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:31 pm to the808bass
quote:
Of course he would. The emperor has no clothes and everyone sees it. Hank still pretends he’s wearing a robe.
I don't know about Hank (I haven't posted here that long) but that absolutely describes a large chunk of the judiciary these days. This decision came down to "legal analysis" about as much as Obergefell.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:32 pm to Flats
Obergerfell was a bit flowery, but I never Understood how accepting traditional religious definitions of marriage isn’t an establishment of religion When a lot of religions now accept gay marriage.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:40 pm to Jjdoc
Not safe for children to use public restrooms anymore. That is so messed up. These judges need to go.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:47 pm to Pussykat
I don't understand how this is an issue. You have a penis, off to the men's room you go. You have a vagina, off to the women's room you go. frick your feelings.
This post was edited on 8/13/19 at 4:48 pm
Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:48 pm to Janky
You ever seen a trans man?
Most look very much like dudes.
Every time they go to the bathroom would be an issue.
Most look very much like dudes.
Every time they go to the bathroom would be an issue.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:49 pm to Janky
quote:
I don't understand how this is an issue. You have a penis, off to the men's room you go. You have a vagina, off to the women's room you go.
Scalia warned us. They'll continue to create laws that are in line with their personal political beliefs until they're held accountable.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:50 pm to Pussykat
quote:
Not safe for children to use public restrooms anymore. That is so messed up. These judges need to go.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:50 pm to Flats
quote:
They'll continue to create laws that are in line with their personal political beliefs until they're held accountable.
Isn’t that what everyone does?
Isn’t that what people are doing by denying this?
Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:54 pm to bmy
quote:
Are you scared of taking a piss so close to a woman?
Do you have children, particularly a girl? Answer this and I'll make it painfully clear for your limited ability to understand the impact.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:55 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Isn’t that what people are doing by denying this?
Sou you're OK with males and females (because that is all there is) using restrooms together? If so, do us all a favor and find a new country to infest.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:55 pm to back9Tiger
I probably Wouldn’t send a child alone into any bathroom.
Because you don’t need trans rights to sneak into a bathroom.
Because you don’t need trans rights to sneak into a bathroom.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:55 pm to SammyTiger
quote:Yesquote:Isn’t that what everyone does?
They'll continue to create laws that are in line with their personal political beliefs until they're held accountable.
Isn’t that what people are doing by denying this?
I never cease to be amazed by the number of folks who cannot grasp the difference between the Constitutional limits as to what government CANNOT do and the political/legislative decisions as to what government SHOULD do.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:57 pm to SammyTiger
teenagers are no better... in fact this would make it ripe for sexual assault cases and ruin a lot of kids lives for nothing. This ruling is beyond asinine in every aspect of the word.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:57 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Isn’t that what everyone does?
Holy crap, man, did you skip civics class? No, it's not what everyone does, it's what duly elected legislatures do, or in this case (and this was a rule, not a law) it's what the school board elected by their community to perform this function do. And they answer to the voters, who can remove them from office for unsatisfactory performance.
Judges answer to no one and their job isn't to create laws.
Page 4 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News