Jonathan Turley: Slow walking the Callais decision was intentional and political

There are MANY things done in our country to enhance and/or preserve the political power of radical Leftist black people in the USA. Not all of the things done are strictly legal or even moral or even honest.

More from Turley:

quote:

---

Jackson stood alone in demanding that the unconstitutional districts be effectively preserved for the purposes of this election — guaranteeing Democratic seats in the midterm that could be lost in non-racially discriminatory districts. Neither Kagan nor Justice Sonia Sotomayor would join her in the dissent, despite dissenting from the Callais decision itself.

However, it was her language again that drew the attention of her colleagues.

Justice Jackson lambasted the court’s ruling “has spawned chaos in the State of Louisiana.” In an Orwellian twist, Jackson suggested that others were playing politics as she sought to effectively protect unconstitutional Democratic districts. She suggested that the case exposed “a strong political undercurrent.”

In arguably the most insulting line, she lectured her colleagues that this case “unfolds in the midst of an ongoing statewide election, against the backdrop of a pitched redistricting battle among state governments that appear to be acting as proxies for their favored political parties.”

She further said that, rather than maintain “the appearance of partiality,” the Court’s action “is tantamount to an approval of Louisiana’s rush to pause the ongoing election in order to pass a new map.”

Justice Alito had had enough. He noted that her reliance on the 32-day period was a “trivial” objection that put form above substance since no party had asked for reconsideration. It would be waiting for 32 days for no purpose, while the other parties had stated a reasonable and pressing need to finalize the opinion.

He chastised Jackson for a dissent that “lacks restraint.” He denounced the dissent as making “baseless and insulting” claims. He particularly objected to the charge that her colleagues were engaging in an unprincipled use of power” as a groundless and utterly irresponsible charge.”

---

Jackson will end up radicalizing the conservative justices. She's certainly not going to bring any of them over to her side.

There needs to be a Constitutional amendment (not mere legislation) fixing the number of SCOTUS justices at 9.

“There is another class of coloured people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs — partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs.”


- Booker T. Washington - 1903

I bet you can name several today who act exactly like those described by Booker T. in 1903. You know he is rolling in his grave.

quote:

---

If Democrats win in November, they will put at least 4 more Kentanjis on the Court.

---

There’s no presidential election this November.

quote:

---

Democrats win in November, they will put at least 4 more Kentanjis on the Court.

---

Trump is going to nominate them?

Waiting for SloFloPeen to pipe in with his 2 cents saying the delay is totally justified...