- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

John Kennedy is a "No" on new Bi-parsian gun background check bill
Posted on 1/9/18 at 4:59 pm
Posted on 1/9/18 at 4:59 pm
quote:
Kennedy touted his pro-gun rights bona fides in criticizing the bill but saved most of his fire for federal and state bureaucrats. The Louisiana Republican repeatedly called Kelley and other mass-shooters "idiots" and said the country doesn't "need more gun control — we need more idiot control."
quote:
Republican Sens. John Cornyn of Texas and Tim Scott of South Carolina are sponsoring the bill along with Democratic Sens. Chris Murphy and Richard Blumenthal, both of Connecticut. The bill's provisions are aimed at strengthening the National Instant Background Check System by offering bonuses to federal agencies that provide information to the system and grants for states to upload information.
LINK
Can someone explain why stricter background checks would be a bad deal for the country?
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:01 pm to Bison
quote:There already is a criminal background check in place. Also, who determines how extensive a new background check will be? Partisan hacks like yourself? No thanks.
Can someone explain why stricter background checks would be a bad deal for the country?
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:01 pm to Bison
Muh 2nd Amendment!
I will never understand this nation’s obsession with its guns.
I will never understand this nation’s obsession with its guns.
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:03 pm to Bison
quote:
Can someone explain why stricter background checks would be a bad deal for the country?
How could they be stricter than they are now? What would you like to see added?
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:04 pm to Bison
What do stricter background checks do but make it harder for law abiding citizens to purchase guns? Criminals who want a gun aren’t going to suddenly not be able to buy one on the street or steal them as they are already doing.
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:04 pm to Bison
quote:
Can someone explain why stricter background checks would be a bad deal for the country?
Can you tell me which mass shooting it would have prevented?
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:05 pm to Freder
quote:
I will never understand this nation’s obsession with its guns.
How do you define "obsession"? Is there any other Constitutional right that you find "obsessive"?
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:07 pm to Bison
So we can't even require an ID that is provided at no cost before voting, but we require an elaborate scheme to purchase a firearm. One day, the Supreme Court is going to question why circuit courts are treating these fundamental rights differently.
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:08 pm to Freder
As long as you and those like you just keep on not understanding it’s all good.
When you decide to try and take away these things you don’t understand, that’s when you’ve got a problem
When you decide to try and take away these things you don’t understand, that’s when you’ve got a problem
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:09 pm to Y.A. Tittle
No shite. Are we going to allow these background checks to violate HIPAA?
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:10 pm to Bison
How bad can it be if Cornyn is co-sponsoring? He’s a Republican from Texas for god’s sake
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:12 pm to Bison
quote:
Can someone explain why stricter background checks would be a bad deal for the country?
Sure, as soon as you can assure me that strict background checks won't be abused.
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:15 pm to Freder
Stick to dungeons and dragons.
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:15 pm to boosiebadazz
I don't think the proposal is crazy on its face, the question is how much will this do to curb gun violence? None of the mass shootings would've been prevented by this plus it is incredibly easy for criminals to buy guns off of the street.
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:16 pm to Bison
quote:
Can someone explain why stricter background checks would be a bad deal for the country?
Can you explain why it's so hard for you to spend 10 minutes researching a topic before posting about it? It's simple, this has nothing to do with making the NICS "stricter". Democrats, as usual with their uneducated way of thinking, are tacking on something to this bill that is already Federal law. They are also seeking to expand the definition of persons who can be prohibited from purchasing a firearm through a FFL dealer (which is also legally the same as barring ownership in absolute terms) without messing around with the concept of due process. You know what due process is right?
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:18 pm to Bison
quote:Additional imposition on free persons to exercise their Constitutional rights while doing little to nothing to prevent actual crimes.
Can someone explain why stricter background checks would be a bad deal for the country?
Most crimes are committed by firearms that were either stolen or bought on the black market, acquired by family or friends (gifted, borrowed, or stolen), or bought legally prior to a disqualifying offense. When most of the crime committed won't be stopped by the legislation, you're looking at a mostly useless bill that just puts additional barriers and wait times on citizens exercising their rights.
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:18 pm to NIH
Yeah, I'm always of the opinion that increasing meaningless bureaucracy under the guise of 'needing to do something' is pretty much always worse than just doing nothing.
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:19 pm to Freder
quote:You don't value freedom or have a healthy respect for evil in this world, so yeah, you don't understand why people would be "obsessed" (we aren't) with guns.
Muh 2nd Amendment!
I will never understand this nation’s obsession with its guns.
Popular
Back to top


27









