Started By
Message

re: John Kennedy is a "No" on new Bi-parsian gun background check bill

Posted on 1/9/18 at 7:49 pm to
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 1/9/18 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

I will never understand this nation’s obsession with remaining a free people.



Lib translation [ON]
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
59279 posts
Posted on 1/9/18 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

Bison


No response on the GAO's research?

Shocking.
This post was edited on 1/10/18 at 8:29 am
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
22761 posts
Posted on 1/9/18 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

Muh 2nd Amendment!

I will never understand this nation’s obsession with its guns.
Lol, triggered.
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
33618 posts
Posted on 1/9/18 at 9:40 pm to
quote:

I will never understand this nation’s obsession with free speech.
See how stupid you are?
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
39419 posts
Posted on 1/9/18 at 11:36 pm to
How many background checks do we need? Apart from outright ban.

Felons can't own, mental institution history if disclosed gets flaged and barred.

Apart from false flags...at this point...it's either ban altogether or not.

You can't get anymore restritive without a ban. In fact, most would say the current laws already violate the 2nd Amendment. There's no provision that someone has to be perfect Mormon with a good job and no criminal history to own a gun in America.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
24844 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 3:05 am to
quote:

I will never understand this nation’s obsession with its guns.



Then you don’t understand history, especially our history.
Posted by Boatshoes
Member since Dec 2017
6775 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 6:23 am to
"Can someone explain why stricter background checks would be a bad deal for the country?"

Is a poll tax bad for the country?
Posted by jptiger2009
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2009
10010 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 6:37 am to
quote:

Partisan hacks


right, who needs un-biased laws?
Posted by Geauxst Writer
Atlanta
Member since Dec 2015
4960 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 7:16 am to
92 people a day in the US die from a gun shot wound. Stricter background checks is only one step to start correcting this. Our biggest problem is our kill first- talk later culture and the fact that we have 50% of the worlds guns and 5% of the population. We keep the second amendment, but have to start implementing logical changes like background check expansion to keep some people from buying guns legally.
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32966 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 7:24 am to
I am against any Second Amendment restrictions sponsored by Chris Murphy.
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 7:42 am to
quote:

by offering bonuses to federal agencies that provide information to the system


Extra financial incentives for agencies to do their job?
Posted by Onyx Aggie
Foothills of the Smokies
Member since Sep 2012
2953 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 7:54 am to
quote:

Muh 2nd Amendment! 


Why is it that people on the left do not respect the actual negative rights enumerated in the Constitution, but are the first to try to create some nonsensical positive rights like "healthcare"?

The language in the 2nd Amendment is as clear as can be, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram