- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Joe Kent on Shawn Ryan show is truly must watch
Posted on 3/27/26 at 8:40 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 3/27/26 at 8:40 am to NC_Tigah
Your whole post is one ridiculous claim after another.
If Trump had made a regime change war part of his campaign in 2024, he would have lost to Harris
Let me say that again. Trump would have lost to Harris.
Kamala Harris would have beat him.
Iran is a regional pain in the arse. They are not a threat to the United States and they never were a real threat to the United States.
If Trump had made a regime change war part of his campaign in 2024, he would have lost to Harris
Let me say that again. Trump would have lost to Harris.
Kamala Harris would have beat him.
Iran is a regional pain in the arse. They are not a threat to the United States and they never were a real threat to the United States.
3
Posted on 3/27/26 at 8:42 am to the808bass
1:33:00 for about 15 minutes. Bret Weinstein.
This post was edited on 3/27/26 at 8:43 am
Posted on 3/27/26 at 8:43 am to SirWinston
fricking lazy fig.
Posted on 3/27/26 at 8:44 am to tide06
Anyone how says that Joe Kent hates the nation of Israel has clearly not watched the interview. He is practical. He makes it clear that Israel is representing their interests and he has no issue with that whatsoever. He thinks we should represent our interests.
Posted on 3/27/26 at 8:44 am to SirWinston
This war is necessary. The longer we waited the more costly it would have become. It should have been done a long time ago. Muslim terrorist with nuclear weapons is intolerable. Pray for our troops.
Posted on 3/27/26 at 8:48 am to the808bass
I was trying to be thoughtful but if you want quick hit here its distilled to 2 minutes
This post was edited on 3/27/26 at 8:49 am
Posted on 3/27/26 at 8:48 am to BluegrassCardinal
quote:
Does that mean blindly following Trump into a disaster?
I don't know where you're getting the idea that this is a "disaster" unless you mean what's happening to Iran right now.
Posted on 3/27/26 at 8:57 am to Tiger985
quote:
Iran is a regional pain in the arse.
Who exports terrorism, and the region that they are a pain in the arse in happens to hold 70% of the world's oil and some of the busiest shipping lanes in the world.
This, "Iran was not an imminent threat to the US," whine ignores one big thing. O.k., they weren't an imminent threat to invade America.
So what?
They were still a constant pain in everybody's arse who constantly threatened stability in a very important region that has the potential to affect just about everybody on planet Earth, and who—if they ever got nukes—are the leading candidates in the world to use them due to their fundamentalist theocratic mindset and primitive theological culture.
Not on America, sure, that's true. Not directly or officially. Because that's not how they operate.
They'll officially nuke Israel, though. If anyone doesn't understand how that's a big problem that affects the entire planet, I don't know what to tell you.
And just because they wouldn't directly, officially, try to use nukes on Americans, that doesn't mean they wouldn't find some fundamentalist weird beard terrorists, give them a dirty bomb built into a hot dog cart, and fund and facilitate entry into the US so that they could detonate it in Times Square on New Year's Eve.
That would be right up their alley.
This post was edited on 3/27/26 at 8:59 am
Posted on 3/27/26 at 9:00 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
Anyone how says that Joe Kent hates the nation of Israel has clearly not watched the interview. He is practical. He makes it clear that Israel is representing their interests and he has no issue with that whatsoever. He thinks we should represent our interests.
They attack Kent because they have to in order to support Trump. They don't know why this is happening and cant make logical sense of WH statements that directly contradict previous statements so they just attack anyone who triggers their cognitive dissonance out of sheer tribal instinct.
They call people anti-semitic for the same reason the left calls people fascist or racist: they can't argue the points being presented so they try to end the debate.
Its sad to see the GOP base go the same way the left went while attacking their own if they don't get in line.
Posted on 3/27/26 at 9:03 am to SirWinston
quote:
Everybody on this board should watch Tucker IMO. Yall who criticize him without watching have been tricked bc hes been amazing this past month. Impeccable content.
I did watch Tucker for a very long time. But when he bought property in Qatar and suddenly became very Islam-friendly, he lost me.
He claims to be Christian and boasts about it, but apparently he has ignored where the holy text of Islam commands their followers to kill non-Islamists 140 separate times. What Tucker is doing can be accurately juxtaposed over the "Gays for Palestine" stuff.
And if you're not impressed with Shawn, that's because you're seeing him for what he is right now. 2024 and 2025, he was absolute fire. Beginning late 2025-present, he has shifted.
Posted on 3/27/26 at 9:08 am to SirWinston
quote:
SirWinston
You really don't have a clue, do you?
Posted on 3/27/26 at 9:10 am to SirWinston
quote:
All I know about the Charlie Kirk assassination is that it doesn’t add up. I don’t know why it doesn’t add up. We didn’t get to the bottom of it that we got a compelling explanation that it worries me.
Charlie and I were teamed up on a project to compel the President of the danger of the MRNA shot. I didn’t know him well, but it meant that I had contact with him and I knew something of what he thought. Even his public facing side was very clear about his concerns about an attack on Iran. He was very knowledgeable about the hazards. He would’ve been a formidable voice at this moment.
I don’t know how we ended up in the conflict in Iran. It’s a head scratcher. It’s a mind blowing political error. But if I try to run the tape of how we got here and I imagine that not only did President Trump have you in his ear, but he had Charlie in his ear…I don’t know what effect that would’ve had. But I do know… that we had a policy unfolding under our collective banner as Americans of topping regimes. We didn’t get to Iran because of the quagmire in Iraq.
The war on terror resulted in ill-conceived adventures in the Middle East … that put Iran on hold. I feel, and I cannot say for sure, that something was watching and it felt the clock ticking and its opportunity to bring about this war which I think Netanyahu said he’s been dreaming of for 40 years. So “something” wanted this war to happen and there was the perception that window was closing so that it had to be brought about quickly.
Given how public Charlie was on this topic, I can’t help but wonder. Obviously this will sound crazy to many people that something would’ve even considered such a thing. But I will say, that after Charlie was killed, Benjamin Netanyahu very quickly denied responsibility. I was shocked by this. It did not seem natural.
Now I’m not saying that anything in that quadrant was responsible for the murder. All I know is that we didn’t get a decent investigation. I did feel that denial by Netanyahu, and I hope you will tell me that I’m imagining it, was effectively a Rorschach test and maybe designed to be one. That I was supposed to be alarmed by this. And a normal person was supposed to think “that is batshit crazy. He said they didn’t do it. Obviously they didn’t do it.”
So anyway, I’m not telling you that I see the evidence that somebody did it. But what I am telling you is that we’ve just found ourselves in a war that Charlie would’ve been opposed to. We know that from his public and private statements. And that he would’ve been a formidable force in that position.
So, what am I to think. At least we should have an investigation that tells us for sure who committed the crime and that there wasn’t something larger about it.
Netanyahu’s denial came over a week after Charlie’s assassination, when the Jooo Crew had started to reach their full-throated accusations.
As I knew would be the case, Brett has zero facts. Zero evidence. He’s just “asking questions”. And “calling for an investigation.” We have one. We have a guy who is going to be tried for Charlie’s murder. He had motive, means and opportunity.
You didn’t post any answers to my questions, because you have none. No one one whispering “Joooos” does.
Posted on 3/27/26 at 9:12 am to Tiger985
quote:Define "threat".
They are not a threat to the United States
Is shutting down Hormuz a "threat" to the US? How about nuking Saudi oil fields? Would that be a threat?
Posted on 3/27/26 at 9:14 am to SirWinston
You just can't convince me something isn't sketchy about Kent, he's coming off as a Crenshaw 2.0. You were gung-ho for so long in your anti-Iran rhetoric and then all of sudden when 50 years in the making finally comes to fruition you bail saying they didn't pose a threat.
Well 440kg of 60% enriched uranium as reported by the IAEA proved your assessment false and the fact that just a few days ago they launched two IRBMs at Diego Garcia provided your assessment even further to be false. The fact that he has been proven wrong on two enormous facets of Iran makes me think he's fake MAGA or a deep state plant.
Shawn is swinging that way as well. I don't mind that he had Cocaine Biden and Gavin on his show, but they fact that he just let them sit there and lie to his face about everything and tell their story with no rebuttal with evidence to the contrary make me think he's so anti-government that he just wants to let the world burn. Rogan will call you our on your bullshite to your face. I personally haven't watched a SRS in a couple of months for this reason. After watching some of the Newsome episode and then a few weeks later with Hunter...I decided I was out.
Well 440kg of 60% enriched uranium as reported by the IAEA proved your assessment false and the fact that just a few days ago they launched two IRBMs at Diego Garcia provided your assessment even further to be false. The fact that he has been proven wrong on two enormous facets of Iran makes me think he's fake MAGA or a deep state plant.
Shawn is swinging that way as well. I don't mind that he had Cocaine Biden and Gavin on his show, but they fact that he just let them sit there and lie to his face about everything and tell their story with no rebuttal with evidence to the contrary make me think he's so anti-government that he just wants to let the world burn. Rogan will call you our on your bullshite to your face. I personally haven't watched a SRS in a couple of months for this reason. After watching some of the Newsome episode and then a few weeks later with Hunter...I decided I was out.
This post was edited on 3/27/26 at 9:16 am
Posted on 3/27/26 at 9:16 am to SirWinston
How Ryan still has credibility after the whole Tesla bombing is beyond me.
Posted on 3/27/26 at 9:17 am to SirWinston
Screw these guys, they're not patriotic..Trump is my president and I LOVE war now!!
Posted on 3/27/26 at 9:23 am to The Pirate King
I think he is a fraud and a piece of shite
This post was edited on 3/27/26 at 9:39 am
Posted on 3/27/26 at 9:26 am to TigerAxeOK
That’s just not remotely true. The Shawn Ryan’s, Dave Smiths, Tuckers, Rogan’s of the podcast world took Trump at his word that he was a non-interventionist.
It is Trump that has changed positions, not the podcasters.
You are intellectually dishonest to say otherwise.
It is Trump that has changed positions, not the podcasters.
You are intellectually dishonest to say otherwise.
Posted on 3/27/26 at 9:28 am to SirWinston
frick Joe Kent.
Posted on 3/27/26 at 9:34 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
They'll officially nuke Israel, though. If anyone doesn't understand how that's a big problem that affects the entire planet, I don't know what to tell you.
I think this is the most important thing about this situation is , yes... Iran would nuke Israel if they obtain a nuke.
But here's the thing, Israel would never allow that to happen. They would nuke Iran first, which would rurn the world into chaos.
It's best that we're there with Israel so we can somewhat control/influence Israel.
Israel views Iran much differently than we view Iran, sitting on our computers/phones offering our opinions.
Israel rightly sees Iran as a threat to their existence and would go to any limits to preserve themselves.
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News