- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It's time to take another look at the "autopen" pardons granted by someone not named Biden
Posted on 6/21/26 at 11:30 am to Sid E Walker
Posted on 6/21/26 at 11:30 am to Sid E Walker
quote:
And what percentage of the total pardons was it used?
86.75309%
0
Posted on 6/21/26 at 11:41 am to TBoy
Your one to be talking about psychosis, oh the frickin irony
Posted on 6/21/26 at 11:45 am to udtiger
quote:
So if I mail a ricin filled envelope from DC that kills someone in Louisiana, I cannot be charged for murder in Louisiana?
Has literally nothing to do with a lab in China (not under any control of Fauci) accidentally releasing a virus
quote:
Stick to family law.
I would suggest not trying to talk shite when you just posted something so dumb
Posted on 6/21/26 at 11:47 am to TBoy
quote:
TBoy
Hey dumbshit, so since Buden was not coherent, who in the frick was sunning the autopen?
Posted on 6/21/26 at 11:49 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
Already confirmed by insiders that Biden personally issued none of his pardons… with the exception of one: Hunter Biden’s.
I think you're misremembering things. What has been "confirmed" is that Hunter Biden's pardon was the only one signed by Biden's hand. In reality, this doesn't make a bit of difference unless you can somehow prove that Joe Biden did not approve of the other pardons, which would be very hard to do. He can simply lie and say that he approved them.
Some have said that he was selling pardons, or that Elizabeth Warren was selling pardons. And even if that were the case, those pardons would remain valid. People brokering any deals may end up in trouble, but the pardons themselves would remain valid.
The only way to get around the pardons is to either bring them up on state charges, unrelated crimes, or maybe if you prove that Biden wasn't a legitimate POTUS.
Posted on 6/21/26 at 11:49 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
I knew you would post something stupid and you did not disappoint.
Posted on 6/21/26 at 11:50 am to BoarEd
quote:
. In reality, this doesn't make a bit of difference unless you can somehow prove that Joe Biden did not approve of the other pardons, which would be very hard to do. He can simply lie and say that he approved them.
Correct
Posted on 6/21/26 at 12:01 pm to TBoy
quote:
Republicanism is psychosis.
Who wants to tell him? I just don't have the energy.
Posted on 6/21/26 at 12:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
go away
Posted on 6/21/26 at 1:39 pm to TBoy
quote:
The magical thinking of right wingers. Just use the word “autopen” and you have unlimited power that is not shared with any previous administration. Republicanism is psychosis.
Do you think retards know they’re retarded?
Posted on 6/21/26 at 1:44 pm to BoarEd
quote:
What has been "confirmed" is that Hunter Biden's pardon was the only one signed by Biden's hand. In reality, this doesn't make a bit of difference unless you can somehow prove that Joe Biden did not approve of the other pardons, which would be very hard to do. He can simply lie and say that he approved them.
He needs to be on a witness stand answering questions about the pardoned, including a few questions about made-up people. When it's shown that he has no fricking idea who he did or did n'ot pardon it will be a reasonable take that he, himself, did not pardon them.
Posted on 6/21/26 at 1:58 pm to Timeoday
They created the damn thing to help with redundant and insignificant letters. There is no way an auto pen sig should be legal for actual legal documents.
Posted on 6/21/26 at 2:34 pm to Timeoday
I'd be more worried about the man who now holds the pen.
Posted on 6/21/26 at 2:53 pm to Timeoday
No arrests no care
Posted on 6/21/26 at 3:04 pm to Padme
quote:
There is no way an auto pen sig should be legal for actual legal documents.
This whole thing is a bizarre right wing fantasy. The disconnect from reality is beyond rational. Documents can be signed by stamp, by electronic signature, by printed form, autopen, or in whatever form the signer authorizes. But right wingers are so invested in this “autopen” fantasy that they talk about it like it means something. It’s all meaningless bull.
Posted on 6/21/26 at 3:04 pm to Timeoday
quote:
Perhaps our DoJ should indict Fauci as a test case for the use of the autopen
They need to indict Birx and tell her she either sings, with everything or she pays full price for everything. She wasn’t given a get out of pound you in arse federal prison pass.
Posted on 6/21/26 at 3:12 pm to Boomdaddy65201
quote:
They need to indict Birx and tell her she either sings, with everything or she pays full price for everything. She wasn’t given a get out of pound you in arse federal prison pass.
Probably just do not want the American people to completely realize what their government will do to them.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 7:43 am to Timeoday
Posted on 6/23/26 at 7:55 am to Timeoday
Posted on 6/23/26 at 11:36 am to ksayetiger
quote:
Did someone besides Biden have authority to use the autopen?
Please answer that.
In a court of law, this would be the wrong question. The question should be, "did someone unauthorized to use the autopen actually use it". I have read all of Comer's statements regarding the autopen, and all though there is some smoke, there (so far) is no fire. Even if Biden sais that he does not remember signing something, this is a statement regarding his memory, more than anything else, You would have to find the person who used the autopen and prove that he used it.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News