- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/27/26 at 2:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
it's nowhere near "aiding and abetting" a murder
Claiming the funding of an operation that led to the murder of millions of people is NOT aiding and abetting is quite an interesting argument.
quote:
Assuming this is 100% true
It is.
quote:
Fauci is a civilian
Are you sure about that?
Regardless laws are meaningless when the general public is ready to revolt. Revolution comes from the barrel of a gun not a pen.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 2:18 pm to ManBearSharkReb
quote:
Claiming the funding of an operation that led to the murder of millions of people is NOT aiding and abetting is quite an interesting argument.
There are lots of links, parties, organizations that insulate Fauci. Fauci is too many degrees removed from the accidental release for those claims.
quote:
Are you sure about that?
Yes. 100%
quote:
Regardless laws are meaningless when the general public is ready to revolt.
Oh so you're just making shite up and promoting fantasies fetishizing illegal behavior. Got it, Kevin Garnett
HOW-eva, it makes this comment
quote:
You’re limited in your cognitive capacity and can’t think beyond your small insignificant world where your legal practice makes zero impact on the world outside of your shanty town.
Infinitely comedic
Some of us are tied to reality and live on Earth, not fantasies in our minds.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 2:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
Not a single word you wrote contradicted any argument I made.
I especially liked when you used ad hominem to distract from the fact that you haven’t disputed a single argument I’ve made.
I especially liked when you used ad hominem to distract from the fact that you haven’t disputed a single argument I’ve made.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 2:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Fauci is too many degrees removed
The director of the NIH who controls all funding for research is “too many degrees removed” from the funding of the wuhan lab is your argument.
Compelling.
quote:
Are you sure about that? Yes. 100%
So you can make a claim with absolute certainty Fauci had zero ties to any intelligence agencies foreign or domestic?
Compelling.
quote:
fetishizing illegal behavior
I’m telling you how history works. You think the letter of the law is followed during war or revolution?
What a naive child.
This post was edited on 6/27/26 at 2:32 pm
Posted on 6/27/26 at 2:31 pm to TBoy
You would gladly support treason, as long as a Democrat was perpetrating it.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 2:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Fauci is too many degrees removed from the accidental release for those claims.
Everytime I think you cannot possibly say something more retarded you go and totally out do yourself. Bravo.
Posted on 6/28/26 at 7:49 am to LawTalkingGuy
There will be a new precedent.
Posted on 6/28/26 at 9:26 am to Timeoday
At the end of the day, how can you be given a pardon for a crime you haven’t been charged for, unless the person giving the pardon KNOWS what you did…
Posted on 6/28/26 at 8:17 pm to Placekicker
quote:
At the end of the day, how can you be given a pardon for a crime you haven’t been charged for, unless the person giving the pardon KNOWS what you did…
Joe Biden says, "C'mon man"!!
Posted on 6/28/26 at 8:21 pm to Timeoday
Autopens are for responding to children that write the president!!!!!
Not for executive orders and pardons!!!! Unbelievable!
Not for executive orders and pardons!!!! Unbelievable!
Posted on 6/28/26 at 8:24 pm to Timeoday
Pretty sure pardons are only valid for a specific crime not blanket immunity from any and all legal crimes during a wide spread period. These pardons by Biden and whom he gave them to point to guilt which is the fricked up part.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:19 am to Barstools
quote:
Everytime I think you cannot possibly say something more retarded you go and totally out do yourself. Bravo.
We all agree gun manufacturers aren't responsible for deaths created by their products right?
In that analogy, Fauci would be a CEO of a company who financed the manufacturing of a component of a gun that Remington used to make a firearm.
In what way could he ever be held responsible for a murder committed with that firearm?
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:25 am to SlowFlowPro
Because Fauchis as CEO was told the law and knew that certain components of the gun were let's just say "radioactive" when assembled together. It's illegal to assemble that gun here so he with the help of 3 letter agencies go to a place that isn't illegal. He over saw the assembly and when the radiation leaked out it killed millions of people. The he tried to cover it up.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:27 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Rand Paul will be having a committee to see if a criminal referral is warranted. At least he is on it, full credit to Rand... but then another committee will form..
Great.
Another committee.
They’ll go to lunch, write some sternly worded letters, and talk tough in front of a camera while wagging a finger.
And nothing will be done.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Has literally nothing to do with a lab in China (not under any control of Fauci) accidentally releasing a virus
You think the virus was “accidentally released”?
Oh, you sweet summer child….
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:41 am to Branson
Show me how many CEOs were prosecuted for murder in the US because a supply chain spoke they had no direct control over made a mistake in the manufacturing process that made the product unsafe.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:43 am to riverdiver
quote:
You think the virus was “accidentally released”?
Considering how badly it hurt China, it would be a strenuous argument to try to support the claim China released it intentionally
This is ignoring how the US came out stronger (relatively) than the rest of the world, assuming an even more dominant place in the global hierarchy
Back to top


0





