- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s always the same players- Boasberg signed off on Jack Smith subpoena of Ted Cruz cell
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:00 am to Placekicker
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:00 am to Placekicker
quote:
Jack Smith subpoenaed Ted Cruz’s cellphone records from AT&T.
A Judge who signed off told AT&T not to inform Ted Cruz because he would destroy them and it was a matter of national security.
Sounds typical of a subpoena in a criminal investigation.
1
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:01 am to Decatur
If Trump did this you would be crying it's a partisan witch hunt and abuse of power.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:01 am to Placekicker
quote:
he would destroy them
Cruz would destroy the cell records that AT&T had?
That doesn’t make sense.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:04 am to SlowFlowPro
Oh.
Then why the shite is everyone saying these folks were wiretapped?
Were they attempting to wiretap them?
Lemme go read about this stuff real quick.
ETA: My mistake saying wiretap.
Why were they secretly getting phone records of these people?
Then why the shite is everyone saying these folks were wiretapped?
Were they attempting to wiretap them?
Lemme go read about this stuff real quick.
ETA: My mistake saying wiretap.
Why were they secretly getting phone records of these people?
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 8:06 am
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:09 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
If Trump did this you would be crying it's a partisan witch hunt and abuse of power.
They did the same thing to Schiff and Swalwell. Robert Hur did the same thing to Biden.
Stop acting like this stuff is out of the ordinary in investigations.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
But, within our current system, why would legislators be above the law, exactly?
So you would have no problem if Kash, or Bondi went to Judge Pierro and asked her for wiretaps on Shumer, Boesberg, Crockett, AOC, Bernie etc.??
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:12 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
But, within our current system, why would legislators be above the law, exactly?
Apparently, only the legislators who supported the Biden administration were above the law. Why weren't any of them included in this fishing expedition?
Congress should not be "above the law", but their should be a higher standard to investigate them because of politics involved in their job and the potential for lawfare.
Was their a predicate crime that justified the investigation? Was their any evidence at all against these 160+ people that were investigated? Or was this a fishing expedition where they were just trying to sort through everyone's shite to see if they can find something?
Why did they need to keep all of this a secret? Ted Cruz was not a flight risk. If they had a reason to keep it secret, why wasn't Cruz notified of the investigation once he was exonerated? If the investigation was on the up and up, this should have been made public, or at least revealed to Cruz and he could decide whether to make it public.
No. This stinks to high heaven and should be called out. If the party in power can just issue subpoenas for anyone they want with no evidence of any crime, then we are going to start spiraling downhill as a free society.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:21 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:07 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
STATISTFlowPro
You have ZERO credibility left on this board. By now, a person would have to be brain-dead not to see how unbelievably protective you are of the corrupt Political Establishment.
Oh, I forgot. You don't even belive that there is a corrupt Political Establishment.
(Now I'll await his response filled with emoticons, memes, "ad hommies," "wut," etc.).
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:08 am to Placekicker
Judges are untouchable so it makes perfect sense for the Left to use them as Foot Soldiers.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:40 am to Friscodog
quote:
So you would have no problem if Kash, or Bondi went to Judge Pierro and asked her for wiretaps on Shumer, Boesberg, Crockett, AOC, Bernie etc.??
The clown troll didnt answer this did he? Didn't you know, normal people get subpoenaed all the time?
No probable cause, just a subpoena for a crime they have no idea about.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
why would legislators be above the law, exactly?
What law, exactly?
I wasnt aware that fishing expeditions have been codified
And once AT&T denied the request, is threatening them into silence also lawful?
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't know what lawfare is even more after this thread and the huge expansion of the malleable term
Spoken like a true progressive leftist
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:32 am to Placekicker
Something a lot less cumbersome than impeachment is needed to slap down these rogue commie judges.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:57 am to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
Boasberg again huh? Well im sure this is all just fine
Must just be a huge coincidence that he keeps popping up in Trump/Republican matters.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:22 am to Placekicker
One problem with this stuff - who is a good source on the facts?
I am reading all sorts of stuff about this, some that is contradictory.
Regardless, this whole Arctic Frost thing seems like a big deal. At the very least, Boasberg and Smith need to be put under oath and answer some questions.
I am reading all sorts of stuff about this, some that is contradictory.
Regardless, this whole Arctic Frost thing seems like a big deal. At the very least, Boasberg and Smith need to be put under oath and answer some questions.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:30 am to FightinTigersDammit
quote:That one may not be covered by his fake law degree
What other term covers a subpoena of a sitting senator's phone records, along with an unveiled threat of retaliation?
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Normal people get subpoenas against them like this everyday for even less articulated criminal behavior.
You failed to answer my question.
What criminal behavior would warrant the secret surveillance of hundreds of individuals including congressmen, donors and media whose only connection is their political leanings?
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 11:34 am
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:38 am to Placekicker
quote:
It’s always the same players
Beee-cuz....
They are actually featured actors and cast members of a Reality Show (that isn't "Reality").
So no, none of this has been real. Is everyone enjoying the roles, performances and twists in the plot lines over the past 10 years?
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:39 am to SquatchDawg
quote:
What criminal behavior would warrant the secret surveillance of hundreds of individuals including congressmen, donors and media whose only connection is their political leanings?
Lots of folks were communicating about Trump’s criminal conspiracy to overturn the results of the 2020 election. The subpoena was for toll records (business records), that’s only info on who called whom, for how long, etc. There’s no recognized expectation of privacy for these kind of records so they can be obtained through grand jury subpoenas. They are not wiretaps that collect the audio of the calls.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News