- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It seems Mamoud khalil will likely win his immigration court hearing.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 6:45 pm to Pandy Fackler
Posted on 4/11/25 at 6:45 pm to Pandy Fackler
He already lost you prick! GFY
Posted on 4/11/25 at 6:47 pm to Westbank111
quote:
He already lost you prick! GFY
Well he lost his immigration hearing but he gets to appeal that. He also has a habeas corpus hearing set in New Jersey.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 6:47 pm to Westbank111
Why hasn’t the thread title been forcibly edited yet
Posted on 4/11/25 at 6:49 pm to Proximo
quote:Because it is now wrong and serves a purpose.
Why hasn’t the thread title been forcibly edited yet
Posted on 4/11/25 at 6:53 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:
Because I don’t think he deserves to be deported.
Guess what, nobody gives a shite what you think. The Raghead agitator is getting sent back to the sandbox. Hopefully, his green card ticket joins him.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 6:54 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Pandy I appreciate your tenacity. Here was what I found with AI which suggests that the New Jersey case is subject to dismissal as being premature....
Filing a habeas corpus petition before exhausting all available immigration remedies is generally not allowed. The principle of exhaustion of remedies requires that a petitioner must first present their claims to the highest state court before seeking relief in federal court, and similarly, in the context of immigration, all available administrative and judicial remedies within the immigration system must be exhausted first.
However, there are exceptions to this rule. If the petitioner can demonstrate that pursuing further state or immigration remedies would be futile, result in undue delay, or cause irreparable harm, they may be excused from the exhaustion requirement.
In summary, while exhaustion of remedies is typically required, there are circumstances under which a habeas corpus petition can be filed before all immigration remedies have been exhausted.
Well I'm not being tenacious really, I'm just responding to people's posts, but to your point, all that may be true. The only thing I'm commenting on is that he currently has a pending habeas case. In fact, the judge for that case has ordered the defense and the government both to immediately present certain findings to him (I forget what findings).
Posted on 4/11/25 at 6:57 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:
Maybe it'll get transferred to Louisiana, maybe not. But right now, it's New Jersey.
Depending on AI for legal conclusions is not very smart.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 6:57 pm to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
Guess what, nobody gives a shite what you think. The Raghead agitator is getting sent back to the sandbox. Hopefully, his green card ticket joins him.
She might, but he has to be deported first.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 6:59 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:
Well he lost his immigration hearing but he gets to appeal that. He also has a habeas corpus hearing set in New Jersey.
10’seconds on Google would have saved you this embarrassment.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:01 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:
She might, but he has to be deported first.
What is the proper appellate court after an immigration hearing.
You dummy.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:07 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:
Well he lost his immigration hearing but he gets to appeal that. He also has a habeas corpus hearing set in New Jersey.
You gonna show up outside with your Khalil #1 foam finger?

Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:09 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:
Because I don’t think he deserves to be deported.

Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:10 pm to Pandy Fackler
This thread aged well.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:11 pm to Godfather1
And that's all it is. Upvote deployed.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:16 pm to Riverside
quote:
That happened today where he lost. Now he goes back to his cell until he’s released or deported.
That’s not actually right. All that happened today was that the charges in the Notice to Appear were sustained. The IJ gave them 2 weeks to file relief. See my post a few pages back where I briefly touch on some options he has. If he loses on his relief then he gets a removal order. He could in theory file an interlocutory appeal, but the BIA explicitly disfavors those and would tell them send the whole case up after relief is decided.
If y’all are going to be dunking on Pandy and calling them an idiot, at least make sure you are correct.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:20 pm to Tiger1242
quote:
nah. Executive branch has authority to deport a non-citizen for any reason they want w/out due process. Is this true? I know what the alien act and the sedition act is but didn’t know that’s what it says.
That 100% is not true, except if you are in an invading force and over 14 and the Aliens Enemy Act is being invoked. It’s what the administration is trying to do for Venezuelans now, but it does not apply generally. That dude is projecting his wishes as facts.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:32 pm to Pandy Fackler
I can't find anything to say that the case in federal district court in New Jersey is moot.
FWIW, I think a case can be made for wrongful arrest which would be unrelated to the subsequent (lawful) deportation.
Here's an example of reporting from ABC which refers to the litigation in federal court in New Jersey as being "separate."
"While Friday's hearing took place in immigration court, a separate case has been playing out in a federal court in New Jersey over whether Khalil should have been arrested and detained at all."
FWIW, I think a case can be made for wrongful arrest which would be unrelated to the subsequent (lawful) deportation.
Here's an example of reporting from ABC which refers to the litigation in federal court in New Jersey as being "separate."
"While Friday's hearing took place in immigration court, a separate case has been playing out in a federal court in New Jersey over whether Khalil should have been arrested and detained at all."
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:42 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I can't find anything to say that the case in federal district court in New Jersey is moot.
FWIW, I think a case can be made for wrongful arrest which would be unrelated to the subsequent (lawful) deportation.
Here's an example of reporting from ABC which refers to the litigation in federal court in New Jersey as being "separate."
"While Friday's hearing took place in immigration court, a separate case has been playing out in a federal court in New Jersey over whether Khalil should have been arrested and detained at all."
Well if the court determines he shouldn't have been arrested at all. Then I wonder what that would do to his immigration case? If he shouldn't have been arrested to begin with, is the subsequent immigration case lawful?
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:46 pm to Pandy Fackler
Well, the ruling of law this time around dispelled all the gaslighting you threw out just now.
Does the defendant and team appeal or not?
He’s rotting in a helish prison you know…
Does the defendant and team appeal or not?
He’s rotting in a helish prison you know…
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:51 pm to BarberitosDawg
quote:
Well, the ruling of law this time around dispelled all the gaslighting you threw out just now.
Does the defendant and team appeal or not?
He’s rotting in a helish prison you know…
Well they're saying they're appealing. So I suppose so.
Popular
Back to top


2







