- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is this supposed to be bad news?
Posted on 3/7/25 at 10:57 am to AggieHank86
Posted on 3/7/25 at 10:57 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I don't know whether the lawyers in question "need" that clearance or not. This is not the issue.
There are hundreds of thousands of Americans with security clearances of one degree or another. The problem here is that Trump is targeting the clearances of those that he perceives as personal enemies.
That is Third World government at its finest.
Sure, of the hundreds of thousands of Americans with security clearances, I'll bet there are many that need to be looked into and should have them stripped. But doesn't it make sense to investigate ones that are known to you to have shady reasons or intentions for having one? Kind of like deportations starting with know criminals.
0
Posted on 3/7/25 at 10:57 am to jimmy the leg
quote:Unlike you, I think that those accused of crimes are entitled to all of the protections afforded by the US Constitution. Yes, I understand that you think this is a crazy position.
you prefer violent criminals to law abiding citizens.
Posted on 3/7/25 at 10:59 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Using the power of the federal government to engage in vindictive retaliation against personal enemies.
MAGA!
Letitia James literally announced as a campaign platform her goals to engage in vindictive retaliation against Donald Trump and she is a STAR of your party.
Posted on 3/7/25 at 11:02 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Unlike you, I think that those accused of crimes are entitled to all of the protections afforded by the US Constitution.
Except, of course, Trump.
You lefties are insane.
Posted on 3/7/25 at 11:02 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Sadly, it is not.
Democrats and Perkins Coie set that precedent. They should also be able to hold up under a return volley.
FAFO. More to come.
Save your concern trolling for DU.
Posted on 3/7/25 at 11:05 am to jimmy the leg
quote:Whuuuut?
Unlike you, I think that those accused of crimes are entitled to all of the protections afforded by the US Constitution.quote:
Except, of course, Trump.
Where have I ever said (or even implied) that Donald Trump is not entitled to the protections of the US Constitution?
quote:Clearly, this would include the right to trial by a jury of his peers under the law.
To be crystal clear, It is my position that Donald Trump is ABSOLUTELY entitled to each and every protection afforded by the US Constitution. Hank, 07-Mar-2025
This post was edited on 3/7/25 at 11:10 am
Posted on 3/7/25 at 11:07 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Using the power of the federal government to engage in vindictive retaliation against personal enemies.
DEMOCRATS!
Fixed.
Posted on 3/7/25 at 11:07 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Where have I ever said (or even implied) that Donald Trump is not entitled to the protections of the US Constitution?
Intentionally obtuse. You can’t play holier than thou, Hank. You reek of hypocrisy.
Posted on 3/7/25 at 11:10 am to idlewatcher
quote:
The whole lawfare starting with them and HRC.
No, it started with Ken Starr and the Bill Clinton impeachment.
Posted on 3/7/25 at 11:12 am to Geekboy
it’s not really as bad as it seems.
Security clearance and contracts are under his perview as an executive and the “limit their access to federal buildings” isn’t as broad as you’d think it is. It’s not like he’s banning them from all federal courthouses for any reason.
Security clearance and contracts are under his perview as an executive and the “limit their access to federal buildings” isn’t as broad as you’d think it is. It’s not like he’s banning them from all federal courthouses for any reason.
Posted on 3/7/25 at 11:15 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Why were you silent when lawfare was used against Trump?
That (D)ifferent!
Posted on 3/7/25 at 11:15 am to AggieHank86
quote:
vindictive retaliation against personal enemies.
Is it personal? If Perkins Coie was behind the Russia dossier (it was, there is no ambiguity there) thats not personal. That was an attempt to dislodge the rightfully elected President.
This firm should not be doing anything more than traffic tickets in Nampa Idaho.
Posted on 3/7/25 at 11:21 am to tadman
Right! They are getting off easy.
Posted on 3/7/25 at 11:21 am to AggieHank86
quote:
To be crystal clear, It is my position that Donald Trump is ABSOLUTELY entitled to each and every protection afforded by the US Constitution. Hank, 07-Mar-2025
So now he deserves those huh?
Now, you claim to have never been in favor of “gender affirming care,” aka - child abuse.
I guess the board needs to see if you have “transformed” even more:
Do you support trannies reading to children?
Posted on 3/7/25 at 11:24 am to AggieHank86
quote:well yeah it kinda is
I don't know whether the lawyers in question "need" that clearance or not. This is not the issue
Posted on 3/7/25 at 11:25 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Show me where Perkins is accused of violating state or federal law, and we will have an analogy worthy of discussion.
Ive never seen someone dig so many holes as a trap, and then proceeds to jump right into them
quote:
The law firm for the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee has acknowledged its clients’ role in paying for opposition research on Donald Trump that helped fund the now-infamous dossier of allegations about President Trump and Russia.
the law firm Perkins Coie, as part of its representation of the Clinton campaign and the DNC, retained the intelligence firm Fusion GPS and entered “into an engagement for research services that began in April 2016
That dossier was then given to the FBI as a referral for criminal prosecution. A dossier with Australian, British, and Russian fingerprints all over it. And you want to question why their security clearance is now vacated?
Posted on 3/7/25 at 11:28 am to RobbBobb
quote:ViNdIcTiVe!!!
And you want to question why their security clearance is now vacated?
Posted on 3/7/25 at 11:33 am to jimmy the leg
quote:"Deserves" has nothing to do with it. But he is absolutely legally-entitled to those protections ... and always has been.
To be crystal clear, It is my position that Donald Trump is ABSOLUTELY entitled to each and every protection afforded by the US Constitution. Hank, 07-Mar-2025quote:
So now he deserves those huh?
quote:The question related to gender reassignment surgery for minor children, and I have never supported it. I challenge you to find any post in which I say otherwise.
Now, you claim to have never been in favor of “gender affirming care,” aka - child abuse.
quote:I support the right of any parent either to allow his/her child to participate in such an event or to abstain from doing so. I absolutely oppose the nanny state either requiring or prohibiting that participation. Parents should raise their children, not the State.
Do you support trannies reading to children?
Posted on 3/7/25 at 11:35 am to RobbBobb
quote:Do you seriously-contend that opposition research is illegal?
The law firm for the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee has acknowledged its clients’ role in paying for opposition research on Donald Trump
Posted on 3/7/25 at 11:38 am to AggieHank86
Where is DOGE when you need them?
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News