Started By
Message

re: Is it legal for local law enforcement

Posted on 1/16/26 at 7:25 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 7:25 am to
quote:

Let's get more specific: can ICE agents be arrested for enforcing immigration law?

No. The federal government has primacy in immigration and border issues.


It's more nuanced than that, like with any LEO. Just enforcing laws they're permitted to enforce doesn't absolutely insulate them from criminal prosecution, at the state or federal level.

If they're enforcing immigration law properly within the legal limits of that enforcement authorization, they're likely immune.

The devil is in the details with those 2 variables.
Posted by ClientNumber9
Member since Feb 2009
10108 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 7:26 am to
Well, don't want to give away my current agency for obvious reasons but I did 10 years in the Border Patrol before moving on to a three letter organization. I've got 24 years of federal service now and looking to pull the plug in the next 18-24 months. It's been a good ride and have seen some pretty crazy things over the years. This job shows you the best and worst of people.
Posted by TigerPlate
North Dallas
Member since Dec 2023
623 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 7:33 am to
Doubt any cop is dumb enough to try to arrest a federal immigration law enforcement officer in the process of performing his lawful duties. Remember these Feds are armed and acting in compliance with Federal law. Supremacy act is in effect. The cop would be hit with all kinds of charges ie interfering with federal agent, obstruction of justice, aiding and abetting criminal from being apprehended. and civil suits for false arrest, false imprisonment not to mention the Feds could just as easily arrest the cops on federal law violations. Would be fun to see though.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
59245 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 7:37 am to
quote:

If they're enforcing immigration law properly within the legal limits of that enforcement authorization


That's the natural assumption.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37270 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 7:39 am to
There is no universal answer to this question
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 7:54 am to
quote:

Doubt any cop is dumb enough to try to arrest a federal immigration law enforcement officer in the process of performing his lawful duties.

I imagine they'd arrest him/her off duty at their place of abode or socializing.

Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13437 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 7:59 am to
quote:

It's more nuanced than that, like with any LEO. Just enforcing laws they're permitted to enforce doesn't absolutely insulate them from criminal prosecution, at the state or federal level.

If they're enforcing immigration law properly within the legal limits of that enforcement authorization, they're likely immune.

The devil is in the details with those 2 variables.



It's actually even more nuanced than that, isn't it?

To lose qualified immunity it's my understanding that it takes more than simply making a mistake. It's my understanding that you would have to willfully disregard policy or training or something. Basically you have to do something that they can prove you had been instructed on otherwise.

For example, even if you violated the 4th amendment in some way during a seizure, that wouldn't necessarily lose your qualified immunity. But if you did it on a Thursday after having been instructed on Monday in a special departmental training on searches and seizures and you violated something that was covered in that training, then you could.
Posted by BrianKellysbuyout
Member since Nov 2025
1615 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 8:05 am to
quote:

Exactly. The simple is yes they can arrest them if they are breaking the law. Being a federal agent isn’t doesn’t give them immunity.


Alot of that hinges on being in the line of duty as well. If a federal officer is committing crimes in the line of duty, the best course of action would probably be to attempt to detain and contact federal law enforcement. If they aren't in the line of duty, and say, driving drunk because this example was used already, yes an arrest would be possible. Federal law enforcement would probably still have to get involved depending on the situation they would likely have to.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
38468 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 8:07 am to
quote:

To arrest federal agents? When those said agents are enforcing the law?

Only if they are breaking the law.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 8:11 am to
quote:

o lose qualified immunity

That's for civil suits, not prosecutions.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 8:12 am to
quote:

Alot of that hinges on being in the line of duty as well. If a federal officer is committing crimes in the line of duty, the best course of action would probably be to attempt to detain and contact federal law enforcement. If they aren't in the line of duty, and say, driving drunk because this example was used already, yes an arrest would be possible. Federal law enforcement would probably still have to get involved depending on the situation they would likely have to.


It's not a perfect example, but it still works.

Derek Chauvin was performing his duties while on duty in the course of his job.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13437 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 8:13 am to
quote:

That's for civil suits, not prosecutions.


Noted.
Posted by BrianKellysbuyout
Member since Nov 2025
1615 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 8:31 am to
He didn't do anything wrong, he was scapegoated by a liberal media, and justice system where he was. He wasn't a federal officer either, but you try to throw out random crap to see what hits the wall I guess.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
23780 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 8:33 am to
quote:


SlowFlo or any other lawyers want to chime in on this?


Geez..... just ask Grok!!!
Much, much easier and direct without the extra bullshite.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 8:35 am to
quote:

He didn't do anything wrong, he was scapegoated by a liberal media, and justice system where he was.

That's not really relevant as the same situation can happen to any LEO today

quote:

He wasn't a federal officer either,

Being a federal officer wouldn't affect anything, either.

Federal officers aren't allowed to kill (the allegations, not my view) people they're detaining unjustly, either.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 8:36 am to
quote:

Much, much easier

grok fricks up a ton, especially on legal issues, just FYI
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
68810 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 8:39 am to
If an ICE agent is violating local law he absolutely is subject to arrest by local authorities…
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
8420 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 8:47 am to
quote:

It's more nuanced than that, like with any LEO. Just enforcing laws they're permitted to enforce doesn't absolutely insulate them from criminal prosecution, at the state or federal level.


I do not think the state gets to decide if the Fed is using "too much force" when they are apprehending an illegal alien for example.

quote:

Derek Chauvin was performing his duties while on duty in the course of his job.


While I get the example, he was a local cop charged under local laws nothing fed.
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 8:51 am
Posted by PeleofAnalytics
Member since Jun 2021
5384 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 9:01 am to
If a federal agent is legally enforcing the law, locals can't do shite other than get themselves arrested by federal agents for obstruction.

This is all virtue signaling though. Local officials are too chickenshit to take a stand and follow through on these threats. They are stupid but not that stupid. They will leave the real obstruction up to the paid agitators that are useful idiots serving as cannon fodder. Their legal teams have made them very well aware what the law is and what happens if they order their officers to obstruct. I think some of them are true believers but don't have the courage to take the punishment for the belief.
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
18012 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 9:03 am to
quote:

The devil is in the details


and there is your answer..............................
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram