- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is 2026 the first time Dems openly endorsed Communism?
Posted on 8/23/26 at 10:02 pm to TBoy
Posted on 8/23/26 at 10:02 pm to TBoy
quote:
There are no marxists in any prominent position in American politics.
The Venn diagram of the communist party’s 2024 platform and the party you vote for is a near perfect circle.
https://www.cpusa.org/article/cpusa-2024-election-platform/
0
Posted on 8/24/26 at 5:03 am to Pedropatterstine
Evil begets evil. Social, religious collapse creates tyrants. The Mafia Democrat - Islamo-Fascist - Transgender - LGBT - Muslim - Bernie Sanders Commie - ChiCom coalition has now opened up their propaganda campaign against President Trump and MAGA.
Their poster boy El-Sayed has even achieved the coveted spot on Fox as a legitimate candidate for the Senate. He's going to be interviewed by Jesse Waters on Fox. They're all falling all over themselves to get in line to interview the radical islamists. (hint: he refuses to distance himself from Sharia law)
Not a pleasant sight watching my country descend into hell.
Their poster boy El-Sayed has even achieved the coveted spot on Fox as a legitimate candidate for the Senate. He's going to be interviewed by Jesse Waters on Fox. They're all falling all over themselves to get in line to interview the radical islamists. (hint: he refuses to distance himself from Sharia law)
Not a pleasant sight watching my country descend into hell.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 5:38 am to theballguy
They haven't run out of ideas, communism is just the end result of their ideas played out over time.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 6:30 am to VOR
quote:
don’t know Marx from Engels
There is no difference. They both worked together. Marx was the writer and the leech, Engels used his fortune to finance ideas that would hinder others from attaining a fortune. The ideas in Marx's two main books however (one was really a pamphlet), came from both Marx and Engels.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 6:35 am to VOR
quote:
You might be persuasive if you learned what defines or makes up communism… There are a small number of Democrats who call themselves “Democratic Socialists”, but they are weak, and don’t know Marx from Engels…
Arguing the semantics of particular flavors or scholars of communism isn’t great for the point you’re trying to make.
It’s doesn’t matter what you pretend to call yourselves to make your party more appealing, you’re communists. That’s what you vote for.
This post was edited on 8/24/26 at 6:38 am
Posted on 8/24/26 at 6:39 am to Godfather1
quote:
quote:
There are a small number of Democrats who call themselves “Democratic Socialists”, but they are weak, and don’t know Marx from Engels…
Denounce these people as too radical.
I all but guarantee you won’t.
Yes,VOR, please outline each specific fringe view espoused by this “small number” that you find abhorrent.
Go
This post was edited on 8/24/26 at 6:41 am
Posted on 8/24/26 at 6:41 am to Pedropatterstine
quote:
Don't know man. There are a lot of dumb and lazy people out there.
Yup...AND productive people vs dependent people have different political interests.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 6:49 am to theballguy
I think it depends on what the GOP trots out there as to what elections will be won.
Are they running against more Darline Grahams?
However, extreme views or bad ideas become normalized when there isn’t enough opposition to illustrate that those views are extreme or not well thought out.
But it’s not across the board. It’s primarily in the strongholds.
Are they running against more Darline Grahams?
However, extreme views or bad ideas become normalized when there isn’t enough opposition to illustrate that those views are extreme or not well thought out.
But it’s not across the board. It’s primarily in the strongholds.
This post was edited on 8/24/26 at 6:56 am
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:24 am to theballguy
quote:
They're going to win less and less going forward.
Never underestimate the stupidity of the general public.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:34 am to TBoy
quote:
There are no marxists in any prominent position in American politics.
Even before the current DSA uprising, the entire Dem platform was based on redistribution of wealth, meaning they had no ideas that weren’t funded by redistribution.
Every time there’s a tax break, the Dem mantra is “it’s a tax break for the wealthy”. They want those who pay no taxes to benefit from tax breaks. That’s redistribution of wealth. Congressional Dems (in prominent positions) love to parrot this.
A recent redistribution scheme is a wealth tax. Newsom supports this in Cali. Bernie and Hakeem love the idea.
This post was edited on 8/24/26 at 8:37 am
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:49 am to TheHarahanian
quote:
Every time there’s a tax break, the Dem mantra is “it’s a tax break for the wealthy”.
Yes, because there is a redistribution going on right now that has been ongoing since the Reagan presidency. The redistribution is moving upward.
You are confused by your intentional decision not to see what is happening right in front of you.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:51 am to TBoy
quote:
You are confused by your intentional decision not to see what is happening right in front of you.
And you’re shifting your argument.
Dems are all marxists. All of them. You included I strongly suspect.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:57 am to TBoy
quote:
Yes, because there is a redistribution going on right now that has been ongoing since the Reagan presidency. The redistribution is moving upward.
In order for there to be a redistribution, then wealth has to be finite. Wealth is not finite and one person's acquisition of wealth does not hamper another's acquisition of wealth. Redistribution is just a buzz word that leads people like you to think that if one does acquire wealth, then it must mean another cannot. This is false.
There are problems with crony capitalism today, but please be honest about it.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 9:08 am to TBoy
quote:
Yes, because there is a redistribution going on right now that has been ongoing since the Reagan presidency. The redistribution is moving upward.
Complete lie. And so easily provable.
What percentage of the annual revenue do the top one percent pay (38%) vs the percentage of overall wealth they possess (31.6%).
quote:
You are confused by your intentional decision not to see what is happening right in front of you.
Typical liberal projection. Spout a lie and call others confused for not believing your blatant lie.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 9:32 am to UtahCajun
quote:
In order for there to be a redistribution, then wealth has to be finite. Wealth is not finite and one person's acquisition of wealth does not hamper another's acquisition of wealth. Redistribution is just a buzz word that leads people like you to think that if one does acquire wealth, then it must mean another cannot.
So if wealth redistribution does not exist, then the so-called Marxist democrats are not advocating for wealth redistribution, right?
Right wingers talk in circles.
This post was edited on 8/24/26 at 9:33 am
Posted on 8/24/26 at 9:37 am to Pedropatterstine
quote:
I just can't and will never understand how a normal human being could do such a thing.
What? Can you point to just one normal human being that does such a thing?
Posted on 8/24/26 at 9:39 am to TBoy
quote:
So if wealth redistribution does not exist, then the so-called Marxist democrats are not advocating for wealth redistribution, right?
Please show your work. Where did I ever say that is what Marxists say?
They do infact say that, but again it is a buzzword for the masses who think either I or you got rich by stopping them from getting rich.
Hey, if you like what it takes to "redistribute" wealth, then by all means, vote for a political bureau. You will love the result. I promise.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 9:41 am to TBoy
You fruits can’t define a woman.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 9:58 am to Pedropatterstine
There was once a Democrat named Huey Long.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 9:59 am to Pedropatterstine
I mean Bernie Sanders would have won in 2016.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News