- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Iran Suspending Delegation For Ceasefire Negotiations
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:35 am to Burt Reynolds
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:35 am to Burt Reynolds
I have been told they "won" the war. Why don't they attack something?
Posted on 6/19/26 at 3:22 am to Burt Reynolds
I would find it funny if the US attacked Israel. Have nothing against Israel, but would be so unexpected and a hilarious troll.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 3:28 am to UptownJoeBrown
quote:
Need to get weapons and explosives into the Iranian peoples hands.
And which people would that be? Some of y'all act like you think there is this ready made, America-loving opposition group, just ready to take over. It's mind boggling naivety.
If you've been following politics and history in that part of the world for longer than six months, you know what would happen next. Rival factions would end up fighting it out for control. And two things that they have in common is they hate Israel, and they hate us...especially after we just blew up a bunch of their shite and killed some of their relatives. They end up fighting it out using the leftover weapons and explosives that you just sent them. Then China, seeing an opportunity, picks a side and starts arming them. And yeah, at some point the winning faction starts playing with uranium again.
Some of us were alive when we armed the Afghans against the Soviets. After the Soviets left, Afghanistan turned into moderate, stable, America loving government, right?
This post was edited on 6/19/26 at 3:51 am
Posted on 6/19/26 at 3:32 am to Teddy Ruxpin
quote:
Iran keeps having Hezbollah fire on Israel, then claims Israel is the problem, and half this board eats it up.
And they think there is this ready made, America loving, peace loving opposition group sitting there in Iran just waiting to take over if we will just send them a bunch of arms. And then they will take power and never pursue nukes and never again fund Hamas or Hezbollah, and everyone lives happily ever after. They're fricking morons.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 3:35 am to Ingeniero
quote:
Including a clause in the MOU that our allies have to stop fighting in Lebanon was fricking stupid
And why in the ever loving frick would any sovreign nation let themselves be bound by some "memorandum of understanding" that we signed with an adversary? Would we do that? Would we let, for example, the United States be bound by some agreement that Russia and Ukraine signed? Or be bound by some agreement that Russia and India sign? frick no.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 3:44 am to AlterEd
quote:
Idiotic people here on this board think Iran is flexing big might by "shutting down the strait", but the truth is that the US can wait this out a hell of a lot longer than they can, even if it is uncomfortable.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 3:49 am to AlterEd
quote:
It's amazing that the morons around here cannot see this.
It's the same old song with you. You post your moronic takes, and you get downvoted to oblivion.
Do yourself a favor, pal: try to find a couple of brain cells to rub together long enough to remember that old adage...if you think everyone around you is an a-hole, guess what..you're the a-hole.
This post was edited on 6/19/26 at 3:50 am
Posted on 6/19/26 at 3:49 am to AlterEd
nm
This post was edited on 6/19/26 at 3:49 am
Posted on 6/19/26 at 4:01 am to Teddy Ruxpin
i'd say more than half this board, because the majority can't think beyond their next shite.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 4:57 am to BamaGradinTn
quote:This logic is irrefutable and causes even the most MAGA Trump, rational, supporters experience a cognitive dissonance that can only result in exasperation in the extreme and the conclusion that this ‘deal’ is bereft of any form of ‘art’.
And why in the ever loving frick would any sovreign nation let themselves be bound by some "memorandum of understanding" that [another country] signed with an adversary? … Would we [by default] let, for example, the United States be bound by some agreement that Russia and Ukraine signed? Or be bound by some agreement that Russia and India sign?
Sorry, but this conclusion is the stuff of Occam’s Razor and not a heretical loss of MAGA purity.
Nuke Iran…
Posted on 6/19/26 at 6:07 am to grizzlylongcut
quote:
At some point, we’re going to have to realize that these savages only understand one thing, violence. And not just the Iranians, the entirety of the Middle East. We need to go Roman on them.
We already tried that and we lost.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 6:08 am to TDsngumbo
quote:
Pull 100% funding and support from Israel immediately. frick them.
You are legit fricking retarded.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 6:17 am to jammajin
quote:
What happening with Iran oh wise one ?
Watching the diehard Trump people do mental gymnastics to convince themselves we won this war is pretty entertaining
Blockade and all troops are removed from the region. That’s called a retreat
This post was edited on 6/19/26 at 6:18 am
Posted on 6/19/26 at 6:22 am to grizzlylongcut
quote:
We need to go Roman on them.
Trump is trying to do his Crassus impression as we speak. I suppose he could go lead the army himself to really sell it but he is an old man.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:35 am to AlterEd
quote:
I agree that the MoU won't last, but to be fair, nothing has been "cancelled." It has been postponed for now. They're saying it could still happen over the weekend. Basically they're on hold waiting to see what Iran is going to do. Iran hasn't cancelled either. They've said that they're reevaluating, but negotiations are still on and they're still wanting to abide the MoU.
You sure about that.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Closing the Straits again doesn’t sound like something a country wanting to abide by the MOU would do.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:37 am to Burt Reynolds
quote:
We already tried that and we lost.
No we didn’t. We haven’t been to war full tilt since 1945.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:51 am to grizzlylongcut
quote:
No we didn’t. We haven’t been to war full tilt since 1945.
Yep, if only we had carpet nuked Vietnam and finished it the proper way.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 8:15 am to grizzlylongcut
quote:
No we didn’t. We haven’t been to war full tilt since 1945.
So you want a full scale invasion with 200K+ lives lost?
Posted on 6/19/26 at 8:17 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Good. Now take Kharg and get us Iranian babes in bikinis
My coffee has not kicked in yet so I do not know if this a serious statement or sarcasm, but I am going to treat it like a serious statement. Even IF (big if) we took Kharg island we are not going to get Persian women in bikinis. The Iranian people are not as resilient as the Ukrainian people. They folded when the shooting started and I highly doubt that have the stomach to rise again. IMO the way to get rid of the IRGC now is to cause a power struggle in the IRGC leadership that eventually leads to fighting between the IRGC and the more moderate elements win. Of course that is just my opinion and I am no expert in the matter.
Popular
Back to top


0






