- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Iran and proxies fire fewer total projectiles, increase accuracy in attacks on region
Posted on 4/3/26 at 9:59 pm to Powerman
Posted on 4/3/26 at 9:59 pm to Powerman
by Powerman
“If anything this might be a reason that them having nukes would be preferable.”
Preferable to who?
Bumpy ride for you on the struggle bus today?
0
Posted on 4/3/26 at 9:59 pm to AGGIES
quote:
Most definitely. And not a surprise.
All the Putin worshippers from a couple years ago are confused.
Couple of months ago, you mean.
Posted on 4/3/26 at 10:02 pm to Bunk Moreland
After 4 years of watching the Ukrainians and Russians trade cheap one way drones with each other, the fact that we don't really have a counter to this new technology is absolutely outrageous. We spend almost a trillion a year in the military and we can't supply accurate, low cost solutions against drone attacks on our allies? The levels of incompetence and grift in the MIC are insane. 
Posted on 4/3/26 at 10:08 pm to WestSideTiger
quote:
I believe North Korea/China wanted nukes solely for defense and once they got those reassurances they’d be left alone all that went away. They are fine with being a hermit.
Iran however wants the weapon for the power it brings and its bullying power would make the ME even more of a powder keg than it ever was. Think India and Pakistan times 20.
NoKo is as crazy as Iran. Nobody believed they wanted nukes for defense, but turns out the government wasn’t suicidal.
Someone said you can compare ballistic missiles to nukes & yea I just disagree. It’s not the same.
Posted on 4/3/26 at 10:12 pm to Bunk Moreland
How do we have the ability to access drones, but can't blow up the stash of them?
Posted on 4/3/26 at 10:14 pm to Centinel
quote:
Nah, I just like making fun of the JOOOOO conspiracists. Sorry if I struck a nerve I guess.
Sure...and there are a few Candace Owens types on here
There are others that offer legitimate criticisms of Israel. That is not equivalent with "the Jews" and you know it.
Posted on 4/3/26 at 10:25 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
Nobody believed they wanted nukes for defense
So what do you think their plan would have been for them then? All of their efforts were just posturing due to what they felt were threats. And it was nasty for quite a while. NK wasn’t innocent either. If they really needed nukes China would have just given them some.
Posted on 4/3/26 at 10:29 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Maybe fake news, but who knows anymore?
doesn't matter, it has to be reported here repeatedly
Posted on 4/3/26 at 10:45 pm to scrooster
quote:
It will not last long
I thought it was only supposed to last 3 days?
Posted on 4/3/26 at 10:47 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Now you know why they couldn't have nukes.
You are all welcome.
Braindead talking point. Republicans are going to get wiped off the map. Trump will get impeached and convicted, assuming he makes it that far.
By all means, continue seal clapping your demise.
Posted on 4/3/26 at 11:25 pm to Turnblad85
quote:
Are Russia and Chine the new "#1 sponsor of global terror"?
Yes, because Russia and China are both known for committing terrorist acts all over the world just like islamists.
Posted on 4/3/26 at 11:26 pm to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
Yes, because Russia and China are both known for committing terrorist acts all over the world just like islamists.
I mean if they’re supplying the islamists that is kind of what sponsor means.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 5:26 am to Powerman
quote:
You think they don't have the right to retaliate when attacked? If anything this might be a reason that them having nukes would be preferable. None of this shite would be happening.
Nailed it. Any country that would prefer to do something other than what we dictate would do well to get a nuclear weapon. ASAP.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 8:11 am to Powerman
quote:
You think they don't have the right to retaliate when attacked?
I guess I missed where the UAE snd Saudi Arabia attacked Iran
Posted on 4/4/26 at 8:20 am to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
couldn’t have nukes
The ole WMDs
the difference everyone actually has proof of their nuclear program and how close they were, especially with the infusion of over $1 billion in cash Obama handed the terrorist regime...
Posted on 4/4/26 at 8:41 am to Murph4HOF
This tells me that the IRGC would launch nukes if they had been allowed to possess them. Confrontation had to happen.
The ‘big one’ looms in the future. As Europe goes Islamic/Communist.
The ‘big one’ looms in the future. As Europe goes Islamic/Communist.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 9:04 am to SoFlaGuy
quote:
So you’d rather a nuclear Iran? Unreal.
I wouldn't expect anything less from POWER BOTTOM...
Posted on 4/4/26 at 9:09 am to dgnx6
quote:
Now you know why they couldn't have nukes.
Doubt we can stop them from getting nukes now.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 9:38 am to Murph4HOF
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News