Started By
Message

re: In WW2 we firebombed millions and then cluster bombed the rescuers

Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:12 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476983 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:12 am to
quote:

You know nothing of 1953 and what you think you know is not the truth.


Did the US/CIA install the Shah as a monarch/dictator of Iran?

quote:

Also, what does this have to do with firebombing Tokyo in WWII?

I explained the differences in another post.

Posted by Two0Five
Member since Oct 2025
331 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:13 am to
Now they're probably our closest ally.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476983 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:13 am to
quote:

But the terror regime has been ousted

Meat suits have been killed. The regime and infrastructure of the regime remain in place.

Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
39699 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:13 am to
The Dems would have firebombed MAGA on Jan 6. The Republicans won’t even drop the Filibuster to ensure a legitimate vote. Go figure.
Posted by Kikicaca
1 Mile from the Atchafalaya
Member since Nov 2016
2385 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:17 am to
Glad you were not in a position of power in 1941. Where have you been since 1978? Iran has been at war with us since then and has been methodically killing our people over that time. And in case you have not been keeping up with current events we are NOT bombing the Irainian people. The Irainian government are the ones killing their people. You think the Ayatollahs, if they could, wouldn't kill every fricking American?
Posted by tigger1
Member since Mar 2005
3860 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:18 am to
No, the US did not install the shah in Iran,

The shah was installed to power in Iran in 1941 by Britian and the Soviet Union.

He replaced his father.


The Prime Minister of Iran led a coup against the shah, and the Shah is the ruler of the country; not the prime minister,

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476983 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:19 am to
quote:

Glad you were not in a position of power in 1941.

1941 has nothing to do with 2026

quote:

Where have you been since 1978? Iran has been at war with us since then and has been methodically killing our people over that time.

That war started in 1953 when we installed the Shah as dictator (or monarch if you want to rely on euphemism).

Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115460 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Remember, WW2 was the last war the United States won. Unconditional surrender works


Total war works
Posted by Uatu
The Dark Side of the Moon
Member since May 2022
619 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:21 am to
I see that We The People have forgotten about October 23, 1983. The Marine barracks bombing in Beirut. I haven’t. I was there. Hezbollah was responsible, with support from IRAN. They’re getting off light with this action by President Trump. If it was up to me, Tehran would be a plate of obsidian glass.
I know that God told us that “vengeance is mine”, but I’m posting here and now that I would wreak vengeance on Iran and take my chances on Judgment Day. The only thing keeping me out of Israel right now are my 7 grandkids. My wife has been at rest in Beaufort National Cemetery for 2 years now. When my time comes, I’ll be right next to her, together again.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476983 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:22 am to
quote:

No, the US did not install the shah in Iran,


We have literally admitted to the coup in 1953

quote:

In first, CIA acknowledges 1953 coup it backed to overthrow leader of Iran was undemocratic


quote:

The CIA now officially describes the 1953 coup it backed in Iran that overthrew its prime minister and cemented the rule of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi as undemocratic.



quote:

Other American officials have made similar remarks in the past, but the CIA's acknowledgment in a podcast about the agency's history comes as much of its official history of the coup remains classified 70 years after the putsch. That complicates the public's understanding of an event that still resonates, as tensions remain high between Tehran and Washington over the Islamic Republic's rapidly advancing nuclear program, its aiding of militia groups across the Mideast and as it cracks down on dissent.

The "CIA's leadership is committed to being as open with the public as possible," the agency said in a statement responding to questions from The Associated Press. "The agency's podcast is part of that effort — and we knew that if we wanted to tell this incredible story, it was important to be transparent about the historical context surrounding these events, and CIA's role in it."

In response to questions from the AP, Iran's mission to the United Nations described the 1953 coup as marking "the inception of relentless American meddling in Iran's internal affairs" and dismissed the U.S. acknowledgments.


quote:

In it, CIA spokesman and podcast host Walter Trosin cites the claims of agency historians that the majority of the CIA's clandestine activities in its history "bolstered" popularly elected governments.

"We should acknowledge, though, that this is, therefore, a really significant exception to that rule," Trosin says of the 1953 coup.

CIA historian Brent Geary, appearing on the podcast, agrees.

"This is one of the exceptions to that," Geary says.

Seven decades later, the 1953 coup remains as hotly debated as ever by Iran, its theocratic government, historians and others.


1953 was a coup that the US created, via the CIA. You cannot spin it. These are facts and we have admitted what it was.

This is when America started this conflict that directly led to the response in 1979. Now, due to the USSR issues, it's an understandable action, especially in hind sight, but it is what it is, and we own the history thereafter.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476983 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:23 am to
quote:

Total war works


When has it worked for the West with extremist Muslims?
Posted by tigger1
Member since Mar 2005
3860 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:27 am to
So, SlowFlowPro you just got proven totally wrong on your 1953 myth.

And you do not even know the Shah was in talks with Britian, and US to change the oil agreement from 1941 and that US was backing the Shah.

You did not know the prime minister led a coup against the shah.

You may known that the prime minister broke the oil agreement.

But you didn't know the Soviet Union was fixing to invade Iran to enforce the agreement, and that is why the US helped Britian to put the shah back in power.
This post was edited on 3/8/26 at 9:31 am
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115460 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:30 am to
quote:

quote:
Total war works


When has it worked for the West with extremist Muslims?


I eagerly await your evidence we have ever fought a total war against it/them.

I'll save you some time. We haven't.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476983 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:30 am to
quote:

So, SlowFlowPro you just got proven totally wrong on your 1953 myth.

No I didn't

quote:

You did not know the prime minister led a coup against the shah.

The Prime Minister acting as he was given power to do isn't a coup.

The coup came in response to that.

quote:

You may know that the prime minister broke the oil agreement.

He was tired of Iran being screwed by its trade partners and renegotiated the deals. It's where Trump got the idea for his trade policy.

quote:

But you didn't know the Soviet Union was fixing to invade Iran to enforce the agreement,

Uh, no. I know that. I even posted about it above
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476983 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:32 am to
quote:

I eagerly await your evidence we have ever fought a total war against it/them.


What was missing in the 2nd Iraq war to make it a "total war"?

We bombed civilians, destroyed the country's entire infrastructure, poisoned and killed hundreds of thousands/millions, engaged in widespread torture, etc.

Posted by tigger1
Member since Mar 2005
3860 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:34 am to


No, SlowFlowPro the Iranian governments is made up on many factions, and it does not work like you think at all.

Once again you need to read much more before posting myths in fiction and read up on how their government worked at the time.

And why did the prime minster stop counting the vote?
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90740 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:35 am to
quote:

We bombed civilians, destroyed the country's entire infrastructure, poisoned and killed hundreds of thousands/millions, engaged in widespread torture, etc.

We did?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115460 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:36 am to
quote:

What was missing in the 2nd Iraq war to make it a "total war"?

We bombed civilians, destroyed the country's entire infrastructure, poisoned and killed hundreds of thousands/millions, engaged in widespread torture, etc.


2nd Iraq war was extremist Islam? That's news to everyone.

Does Mecca still stand?
Have Muslims been put into internment camps?
Have we firebombed Gaza, Kabul?

I am talking the degree of merciless, godless violence and destruction that brought victory in WWII and hasn't been fought since.
This post was edited on 3/8/26 at 9:39 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476983 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Once again you need to read much more before posting myths in fiction and read up on how their government worked at the time.


Says the guy who claims the PM being elected was a "coup", and ignores the actual coup (which the US admits was a coup that we helped create)

quote:

And why did the prime minster stop counting the vote?

Are you referencing the 1952 vote?

The one we admit to influencing?

quote:

And the astounding discovery, I was surprised, is how CIA was involved in the elections that were held in 1952 during the Mosaddegh period. And what their strategy was to undermine Mosaddegh through Parliament. And a lot of money went into basically getting what the CIA thought would be their favorable candidates elected. And this we didn’t know before. But then you would see also that when they talk about, well, we need to get rid of Mosaddegh, they have 18 candidates the U.S. discusses who is suitable to have the next—
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
24241 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:40 am to
quote:

That’s awful. We shouldn’t bomb civilians and destroy entire cities.

I swear some of the posters here would have just handed over the United States to the Japanese or the Germans before the first shot was even fired if they had the power to.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram