- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/26/25 at 2:55 pm to the808bass
quote:
What’s the difference between a concert and a worship service as it pertains to permits?
I already answered that question.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 2:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
You did not.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 2:55 pm to Harry Boutte
quote:
All of these personal attacks on SFP
Attacks in the stupidity of the original assertion, sure. All of which is warranted btw quote:How so? I asked SFP a question and SFP has already admitted it won't be answered
the OP was misleading
Why are churches allowed to have these SAME EVENTS all over the place every week? Why did this ONE get interrupted?
Posted on 7/26/25 at 2:55 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
this is legit permit regulation enforcement on an even handed basis
THAT is a completely different discussion
Posted on 7/26/25 at 2:56 pm to kilo
quote:
You are so woefully wrong on this one. It makes me wonder just how wrong and dishonest you are about everything else you post on this forum. Your appeal to authority logical fallacy tendency is nauseating generally.
So why didn't they get an injunction to stop the illegality of the locality, if it's that clearly wrong?
Posted on 7/26/25 at 2:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Sometimes.
When is it?
Posted on 7/26/25 at 2:57 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
THERE IT IS
THERE IT FREAKING IS
This is SFP speak for "I made a hasty, stupid assertion and now that I've been backed into a corner, I don't want to show that I was wrong and I certainly can't admit I was wrong"
That's not what it is, at all
Posted on 7/26/25 at 2:57 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
According to YOU, singing about Jesus (in a church) is insincere, and a ruse to get around needing a permit.
I never said it was insincere. WTF
I specifically said he checks the sincerity box
Posted on 7/26/25 at 2:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Sometimes
From Universally to Sometimes at light speed
ROFLMAO
Posted on 7/26/25 at 2:57 pm to Narax
quote:
But isn't it up to churches how they worship, and who they invite to play?
Not really, the US hasn't ever allowed cannabis consumption as a part of Rastafarian rituals.
And if the church around the corner advertised that Taylor Swift was to come "worship" there next Sunday, I believe the city might have something to say about that.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 2:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
I think we've reached the point where SFP starts to ignore me because I won't let the question die.
Why are churches allowed to have this same kind of event all over the country every week? SFP swears a permit is required but then also said LEO turns a blind eye.
All LEO
Everywhere
Every week
Why are churches allowed to have this same kind of event all over the country every week? SFP swears a permit is required but then also said LEO turns a blind eye.
All LEO
Everywhere
Every week
Posted on 7/26/25 at 2:59 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Christian places of worship do exist
Sure, even the crazy ones teaching nonsense check the "sincere religious beliefs" box.
That means we get to have the further conversation.
All Pastafarians would have to get a permit. They don't even get to have the conversation over whether or not there is legal protection of their religion.
quote:
so you are obviously on an island comparing it to unanimously agreed insincere troll religions.
By explaining to you people what that means? When you so clearly need it explained.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 3:00 pm to Harry Boutte
quote:
And if the church around the corner advertised that Taylor Swift was to come "worship" there next Sunday, I believe the city might have something to say about that.
I believe you’re wrong.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 3:00 pm to the808bass
quote:
You said it, too.
He said it first. Why weren't you curious enough to ask him?
quote:
Couldn’t last with that assertion for two successive posts?
My assertion that the Montreal authorities apparently agree with Narax? Yeah, it seems obvious to me.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 3:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I never said it was insincere. WTF I specifically said he checks the sincerity box
You literally replied to my post about how it all depends on Sean Feuchts sincerity by saying you don’t think he is
ETA
quote:
It’s all in how genuine you think Sean Feucht is.
After this story and how he reacted? I believe he's not very genuine at all.
LINK to your post
This post was edited on 7/26/25 at 3:03 pm
Posted on 7/26/25 at 3:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:This is so awesome SFP. Now we've moved into the subjectivity of "sincerity" as if MPD had a discussion about this before they barged in on a MAGA friendly performer.
checks the sincerity box
Posted on 7/26/25 at 3:01 pm to Harry Boutte
quote:
And if the church around the corner advertised that Taylor Swift was to come "worship" there next Sunday, I believe the city might have something to say about that.
What if it wasn't advertised? Is that what triggers the need for a permit - that the event is advertised?
Posted on 7/26/25 at 3:02 pm to David_DJS
quote:
When is it?
The same as all similar events/performances who require permits in that locality. So, whatever event meets those variables (they differ by jurisdiction) faces the permitting regs. Churches don't get to be excepted from the universal application of the permitting law b/c it's a church. They have to abide by all other generally-applicable laws.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 3:02 pm to Harry Boutte
quote:
Why weren't you curious enough to ask him?
Because his statement was explanatory. Not defensive of the Montreal government.
We all know they did it because they hate what Feucht stands for with relationship to politics.
You think that’s a defensible position while Narax did not imply that.
Page 17 of 43
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News