Started By
Message

re: I'm Curious. How Many Here Think Lee Harvey Oswald Acted Alone in the JFK Assassination?

Posted on 3/8/26 at 8:03 pm to
Posted by threeputt23
Hammond la
Member since Dec 2021
386 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 8:03 pm to
Oswald was part of the naval intelligence ONII false defection program out of Nagshead North Carolina. He has CIA written all over him….. He may have been double crossed and used as a Patsy, but was definitely part of the entire operation.
Posted by DyeHardDylan
Member since Nov 2011
9732 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 8:20 pm to
I think the CIA, in concert with the Mossad, took him out. It was well known that Kennedy had deep concerns about Israel’s nuclear weapons program and wanted American inspections.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127380 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

Marina giving that testimony about Lee was admissible evidence in ANY American court.
And there was never any court appearance. Ruby solved that problem quite nicely. There is no ballistic evidence. There is no note listing actions to take. There is only the testimony of his wife (which could not be obtained as long as he was alive).
Posted by how333
Member since Dec 2020
4441 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 8:25 pm to
Mafia took him out because he was disrupting gambling operations in Cuba. Big $$$$
Posted by duckblind56
South of Ellick
Member since Sep 2023
5322 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

No way he killed Kennedy by himself.


Correct
Posted by tadman
Member since Jun 2020
5439 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

IMO, the mafia took out JFK....now who shot him?.....we will never know.



Yep.

The mob made Joe Kennedy through bootlegging during prohibition. Then the mob got JFK elected through "voter outreach" by mob leaders like Sam Giancana, Carlos Marcello, and Santo Trafficante. Then Bobby Kennedy went after the mob big time.

Understandably the mob was not okay with this. JFK and Giancana, the Chicago boss, even shared a girlfriend for a while. Within a number of years, they were all dead. JFK, RFK, Giancana...

Meanwhile Oswald was a known visitor to Marcello's office.

Way too much coincidence. Oswald didn't just wake up one day and plant then carry out the murder of the leader of the free world.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
76447 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:45 pm to
Murdering a guy in police custody surrounded by press just some wacky impulse lol
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13434 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

Crazy how he knew exactly when Oswald was being transferred


This is actually the biggest fact against him knowing exactly when Oswald was going to be transferred.

Ruby's steps have all been traced on the day of the shooting.

Sometime between 10:00-11:00 (the exact time doesn't matter for this one, as you'll see) Ruby was listening to the news coverage about the assassination on the radio and decided to go downtown.

But he wasn't in any particular hurry. He decided to stop by the Western Union office since it was just up the block from where Oswald was being held to wire money to one of his dancers. He had to stand in a short line there. At exactly 11:17 (it was time stamped) he completed the transfer.

He arrived on foot at the Police Headquarters at 11:20, and he simply walked down the car ramp int the basement. There had been a guard at the ramp, but he moved to help with traffic...Ruby didn't "slip through" some tight security, he went in where there was no security. And the guard on that ramp wasn't ordered off of it...he stepped away only momentarily on his own volition to help a single police car merge into traffic.

Now here's the thing...the shooting took place at 11:21. Ruby arrived literally just seconds before Oswald was brought out. Probably not even a full minute.

If even one more customer had been in line at the Western Union, Ruby would have missed him entirely.

If the guard hadn't left the ramp post exactly when Ruby got there, he probably wouldn't have been allowed to go down the ramp into the basement. Even if Ruby had been able to talk him into it, it still would have taken some extra seconds and Ruby would have missed Oswald coming out.

Given the timeline, the inference to the best explanation is not that Ruby knew where he'd be and when. That doesn't make sense at all having retraced Ruby's steps, especially the stop at the Western Union office.



This post was edited on 3/8/26 at 11:00 pm
Posted by Boodis Man
Member since Sep 2020
8368 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:40 pm to
I thought it was weird that Ruby would shoot him in the stomach instead of in the head or heart. no blood on the floor. oswald KO'd unconscious from a stomach shot instead of rolling around in pain and quickly ushered out in an ambulance. very odd stuff brothers
This post was edited on 3/8/26 at 10:40 pm
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13434 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:50 pm to
quote:

I think the CIA, in concert with the Mossad, took him out. It was well known that Kennedy had deep concerns about Israel’s nuclear weapons program and wanted American inspections.


Well, the US did inspect Israel's main reactor facilities, in 1961 and 1962. That didn't resolve the tension you pointed out, but for clarity/accuracy's sake, the inspections did happen.

The thing is—and this is something that the fans of Candace Owens and Huckster Carlsons and the like (not saying you are one of those) don't seem to be able to grasp is that motive is not enough to come to a conclusion.

Sure, maybe Israel had a motive, and the CIA did too.

So did the Mafia.

So did Fidel Castro.

So did LBJ.

So did the Soviet Union.

So did France (they helped Israel build the nuclear facility that caused the tension you posted about).

So did the South Vietnamese who felt like JFK wasn't supporting them.

So did various states in Latin America who were pawns in the proxy Cold War between the US and the U.S.S.R.

It's like when Candace Owens tries to make it look like Erica Kirk had Charlie killed because she stood to benefit from it. Probably a half dozen people stood to benefit from it, not least of which is Candace herself.

Motive just does not equal proof, or even enough evidence to personally draw a conclusion IMO. It's just not enough.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13434 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

There have been mob guys (dead now) who said on record that it was a joint CIA/Mob effort.


Not exactly.

Not that I could find, anyway (although I am fine standing corrected if you have a link that says otherwise).

There were a few mob guys who were talked about on record by other people having made those claims, but everything I could find was second or third hand and some of it was decades after the fact.

The closest thing I found to a mob guy going on record that the mob and the CIA teamed up to kill JFK was a guy named Johnny Roselli, who testified before the Senate Church Committee in 1975. He implied (not stated) that organized crime was willing to cooperate with the CIA in plots against political targets in the context of the US's attempts to assassinate Fidel Castro.

He never said anything specifically about Kennedy.
This post was edited on 3/8/26 at 10:59 pm
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
28529 posts
Posted on 3/9/26 at 12:24 am to
quote:

Mafia took him out because he was disrupting gambling operations in Cuba. Big $$$$



Castro took over in Jan, 1959. That was the end of Mafia-backed gambling in Cuba. The mob wanted Cuba back and were enraged when Kennedy pulled his promised air support at the Bay of Pigs but Kennedy wasn't disrupting something that no longer existed.


Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138866 posts
Posted on 3/9/26 at 5:33 am to
quote:

There have been mob guys (dead now) who said on record that it was a joint CIA/Mob effort.


Not exactly.

Not that I could find, anyway (although I am fine standing corrected if you have a link that says otherwise).
James Earl Fines openly claims (frankly with some credibility) to have been the grassy knoll shooter in concert with a mob-CIA operation. Charles Nicoletti and John Roselli were the lead shooting team, situated in the Dal-Tex building. He says Oswald was involved, but probably not as a shooter.

Fines claims his was a back up role, in case Nicoletti missed. He says Kennedy's head moved forward just as he fired, which he assumed to be Nicoletti's final shot hitting Kennedy a fraction of a second before his did.

He says he used a 221 Remington Fireball Pistol with a scope. It is an interesting interview if you've not seen it before. (E.g., He claims Oswald helped him calibrate scopes and gathered spent shell casings prior to Nov 22nd. When Oswald was paraffin tested, only his palms tested positive for GP residue. That is compatible with handling spent casings, not firing a gun. Yet, the official account holds that LHO fired multiple rifle and pistol shots that day.)

Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138866 posts
Posted on 3/9/26 at 5:36 am to
Posted by JackDempsey
Lake Charles
Member since May 2023
862 posts
Posted on 3/9/26 at 5:53 am to
To add to this, the reason Ruby left his apartment was because one of his stripper girls called him and asked him for some money.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
38347 posts
Posted on 3/9/26 at 7:34 am to
quote:

Within 3 seconds of learning the news I said "LBJ did it" = but I didn't mean he pulled the trigger, he just set up - or approved - the whole thing.
I wasn't quite 3 seconds but I was in the 6th grade and at afternoon recess, my fellow conspiracy theory classmates had it nailed. I don't think they had arrested LHO yet (or we didn't know it).
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8364 posts
Posted on 3/9/26 at 7:58 am to
Saw a pretty compelling theory that Oswald missed and a newbie secret service agent who was assigned to the vehicle because the more experienced ones went out drinking the night before whipped around to return fire and shot Kennedy in the head on accident. The secrecy and coverup around the whole thing was because of how nationally embarrassing it would be.

Personally I haven't studied the event enough to have a concrete belief myself that I 100% buy.
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
16636 posts
Posted on 3/9/26 at 8:31 am to
quote:

Because Oswald knew he was surveilled daily by the CIA and FBI, except for the day of Kennedy’s assassination. He knew he was set up to be a patsy. He feared Tippet.

At what moment did he know it?

If he had nothing to do with it, but knew he was being surveilled daily by CIA and FBI because he was a fully committed communist, was it the moment he learned the cavalcade was going to pass directly in front of the place he worked?

Or is it just a coincidence that on 10/4/63 it became publicly known that JFK would be planning a visit to Dallas and 11 days later Oswald applied for a job at the book depository? Sure the route wasn’t known, but it was an opportunity to be near a likely route.

Is it just a coincidence that Oswald’s wife linked him to another attempted assassination in April of ‘63?

If he was concerned about being used as a patsy, why show up to work that day when it was well known that JFK would be passing by AND he knew he was being monitored by FBI and CIA? Seems like any moron would see the glaring red flags of a potential setup. It would have been a moment for a potential patsy to ensure he had a verifiable alibi.
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
16636 posts
Posted on 3/9/26 at 8:40 am to
quote:

I thought it was weird that Ruby would shoot him in the stomach instead of in the head or heart. no blood on the floor. oswald KO'd unconscious from a stomach shot instead of rolling around in pain and quickly ushered out in an ambulance. very odd stuff brothers

True. That lines up with an impulsive decision rather than a well planned decision.
Posted by dpd901
South Louisiana
Member since Apr 2011
7899 posts
Posted on 3/9/26 at 8:46 am to
It was Oswald. He acted alone. 63 years later, despite hundreds of investigations, both governmental and independent, have uncovered not one single shred of concrete proof that Oswald was aided by anyone. Not one slip up. Not one guilty conscience.

The ballistic evidence supports shots from behind. In fact, had someone fired a full metal jacket rife round, at the angle the alleged grassy knoll shot was fired, it would’ve been the left side of his head that was blown out, not the right and Jackie would’ve been hit in the head too. Even the so called “magic bullet” theory has been debunked. Connely’s position at the time of the shot, was inboard and below JFK. Not directly in front of him. He was turned to the side to tell JFK “Mr President, you can’t say the people of Texas don’t love you” None of the zig zagging of the bullet took place. The wounds were all perfectly aligned.

Jack Ruby’s movements on the morning he shot Oswald are also heavily documented. He stopped at a newspaper office to place an ad. He stopped at Western Union to wire money to a stripper. Does this seem like the actions of a man who wanted to be lying in wait for Oswald to be brought out? In fact, Oswald was supposed to be transferred before Ruby even got to the police station. But Oswald himself asked for a change of clothes which delayed his departure, allowing Ruby to get there just in time. Was Oswald in on his own execution?

I get it.. it’s a weird case with a lot of strange connections and happenings. Maybe Oswald was being handled, but that has never been proven definitively. Everyone loves a good conspiracy, including me. But there isn’t a lot of there there.
This post was edited on 3/9/26 at 8:48 am
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram