Started By
Message

If you were Donald J Trump the Great, how would you have handled Iran?

Posted on 6/18/26 at 1:18 am
Posted by RajFromBengaliLand
Member since Jun 2026
22 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 1:18 am
Forget having the foresight of Iran not being a major geopolitical power that most economists and military advisors warn you about—bunch of morons who scream out about resource binded straits as if they know anything.

Like Maduro, just kick the door down and see the whole rotten structure fall.

How would you have approached Iran if you were in Trump’s shoes? TD think tank unite!



Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
13988 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 1:24 am to
The roughly 20 or 30 Sun Tzu's on this board led by the esteemed ambulance chaser himself will tell you that they would have done the opposite of whatever it is Trump did. And that would hold true regardless of what he did. If he had sent 50,000 troops into battle in Iran they would have lambasted him for doing so, but since he didn't, they will tell you that is what he should have done.

Personally, I want to see how this plays out before I form an opinion.
Posted by RajFromBengaliLand
Member since Jun 2026
22 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 1:29 am to
quote:

The roughly 20 or 30 Sun Tzu's on this board led by the esteemed ambulance chaser himself will tell you that they would have done the opposite of whatever it is Trump did. And that would hold true regardless of what he did. If he had sent 50,000 troops into battle in Iran they would have lambasted him for doing so, but since he didn't, they will tell you that is what he should have done. Personally, I want to see how this plays out before I form an opinion.
Would have taken a lot more than 50k. Only if that Biden a-hole didn’t get rid of our logistical support near the borders of Iran by removing those bases we spent 2 decades developing.
Posted by RajFromBengaliLand
Member since Jun 2026
22 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 1:34 am to
It’s honestly crazy when you google the topography of Iran. They don’t even need nukes.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
16909 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 2:22 am to
I would be on trial by now.

Trump did better than I would have.
Posted by Goforit
Member since Apr 2019
8860 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 2:44 am to
A picture is worth a thousand words. I would have sent them a picture of a mushroom cloud with the caption: You have 48 hours to surrender.
Posted by Woodsman
Member since Nov 2024
9 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 3:00 am to
I wouldn't start the war. Iran was already collapsing, their currency crashed and their people started to protests. All we had to do was wait for their people to rebel. By killing their Supreme Leader we made him into a martyr and it unified their country around the new leader. So in reality, all we had to do was nothing and let them imploded. Oh well.. what's done is done. Iran is probably going to be much stronger than before, controlling the entire region.
Posted by p0845330
Member since Aug 2013
6111 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 4:44 am to
I don’t claim to be smart, but I’d have avenged 1979/1980 finally and brought the Shah’s heir in for regime change. I think we missed out on 99% of what mattered. It’s been criminal for almost 50 years and no one seems to want to avenge it and make it right.
Posted by Woolfpack
Member since Jun 2021
1775 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 5:21 am to
I would broadcast back to back episodes of “King of Queens”. Except, I would just cut the last 5 minutes of each episode.
Posted by AUCom96
Alabama
Member since May 2020
7085 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 5:27 am to
First of all, don't start a war if you aren't willing to shoulder the damage of killing American troops. (Not to mention the massive bloodshed from Iranian and neighboring country's civilian population)

If you want war that badly, no one is stopping you from packing your guns and heading on over, soldier.
Posted by LuckyTiger
Top 1% On Onlyfans
Member since Dec 2008
52676 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 5:44 am to
I wouldn’t have done anything he’s done this year.

Bombing the facilities stopped the centrifuges spinning and the enrichment. That was as good as it gets barring total war, which we aren’t willing to do for obvious reasons.

He did more than Obama and Biden, which is good, but the notions that we could topple the government and the Iranian people were just waiting for us to attack so they could rise up were silly, pipe dreams, and lies.

And doing this in an election year is flat out stupid. If you want to go on this misadventure, do it after November. At least then you minimize some of the political damage and have two years. Neocons were almost certainly telling Trump this would be quick.

Alarm bells should have been wailing in everyone’s ears when those talking points began rolling out. They did in mine.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
64294 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 5:49 am to
quote:

I’d have avenged 1979/1980 finally and brought the Shah’s heir in for regime change.


quote:

I don’t claim to be smart


At least you admit it.
Posted by bama1959
Huntsville, AL
Member since Nov 2008
5116 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 5:59 am to
I might have waited until after mid term elections. Iran wouldn't have the same leverage over Trump and he could have spent more of his valuable time campaigning for senators and congressmen. I dont think Iran would have been able to dig up the nuclear material for a bomb in that time.

But hindsight is always better. And killing raidical Iranian leaders is never a bad thing so I'm 100% behind the President on his actions so far.
Posted by LawTalkingGuy
Member since Mar 2025
256 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 6:00 am to
I would have done a better job politically on the front end. Get the country behind the military action. My preference would be Congressional authorization, but if that seems likely to fail then at least convince the intelligence committee that immediate action is necessary.

Get key allies on board, if not to assist, then at least to provide political support.

Then address the American public with a clear explanation of what is happening, and why. You want the people to sacrifice money and lives, then let them know what's going on.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37927 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 6:34 am to
Iran was on the verge of currency collapse in December and January which is why you saw the uprising . If we had left them alone you would have started seeing changes ( uprisings) inside Iran by now and it would not be pretty as time rolled on. The war saved the regime and is looking like a windfall.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
82919 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 6:44 am to
quote:

How would you have approached Iran if you were in Trump’s shoes?


Nuke 'em
Posted by grizzlylongcut
Member since Sep 2021
15695 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 6:48 am to
Damn sure wouldn’t have let them close the strait.
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
16550 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 6:55 am to
Rather than go in and bomb and cause all sorts of economic calamity, only to have to pay Iran $300billion from the other mid east countries, why not negotiate a deal to give incentive Iran to get rid of their nukes ?

Get the money or risk getting nothing AND have your country bombed to hell and back. Get out in front of the strait of Hormuz.

I would have worked with Europe rather than ignore them and piss them off. Get their resources in play. Bring war ships into the strait with guns point at Iran.

As it stands, we lost lives, huge expense (30-50billion) and economic disruption,
Pissed off our allies, only to have to promise to pay Iran $300 billion. Backwards!

I don’t see any 5 d chess here

Oh, and does it even matter!? You can’t trust Iran anyway
This post was edited on 6/18/26 at 7:11 am
Posted by Gee Grenouille
Member since Jul 2018
8257 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 6:58 am to
quote:

Damn sure wouldn’t have let them close the strait.


Closing the strait is as simple as telling the business community that there's a small amount of uncertainty about the safety of passage. Business leaders aren't going to take any chances with billions of value in cargo. It's not as simple as "we will escort you" or "we shot some Iranian boats".
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
64294 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 6:58 am to
quote:

to pay Iran $300billion


quote:

to pay them $300 billion


Who says that anyone is paying them?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram